BOOK-APP AS COURSE LITERATURE IN CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES-STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES

BOOK-APP AS COURSE LITERATURE IN CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES-STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES

E. Hulthén, P. Papadopoulou (2018).  BOOK-APP AS COURSE LITERATURE IN CDIO-BASED PROJECT COURSES-STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVES. 11.

Course literature should aim to provide relevant information regarding the fulfillment of course objectives and be adjacent to students’ needs and preferences. The course literature in the “Integrated Design and Manufacturing” (PPU175) course at Chalmers University of Technology consisted of a printed book, which was used as a guide to projects’ implementation. However, the high price and low transferability of the book pinpointed the need of an alternative option. The solution was a book-app created by digitizing and adjusting the content of the existing book. This paper follows the development of the book-app and it examines its applicability as course literature in a CDIO-based project course considering students’ perspectives and preferences. The first version of the book-app was similar to a PDF whereas the second was enhanced with navigational features. Students’ attitudes towards the use of the book-app instead of a printed book as well as their opinions and suggestions about content formulation and app's features were collected after completion of the course through a dedicated survey and a focus group interview. The outcomes supported that although students were positively predisposed regarding the use of a book-app as course literature, they were not satisfied with the first version of the book-app due to its delayed response and low navigation capabilities. Regarding the second version, they were satisfied with its content and depth of the explanations but they encountered compatibility and navigational issues which affected their overall opinion. The paper concludes that students are ready to use a book-app as their course literature and it suggests design and content features that will enhance the usability and students' satisfaction with the book-app. 

Authors (New): 
Erik Hulthén
Panagiota Papadopoulou
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Book-app
eBook
Digital literature
Project-Based Learning
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Chen, B., & Denoyelles, A. (2013). Exploring Students’ Mobile Learning Practices in Higher Education. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2013/10/exploring-students-mobilelearning-practices-in-higher-education: 
Chong, P. F., Lim, Y. P., & Ling, S. W. (2009). On the Design Preferences for Ebooks. IETE Technical Review, 26(3), 213-222. : 
https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4602.50706
Dobler, E. (2015). e-Textbooks. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(6), 482-491. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.391
Gueval, J., Tarnow, K., & Kumm, S. (2015). Implementing e-books: Faculty and student experiences. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 10(4), 181-185. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2015.06.003
Hanho, J. (2012). A comparison of the influence of electronic books and paper books on reading comprehension, eye fatigue, and perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390-408. : 
https://doi.org/10.1108/02640471211241663
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. (2017). What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful’ digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education, 42(8), 1567-1579. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946
Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Shin, E. K. (2017). Students' expectation, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use digital textbooks. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 83-90. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.025
Lam, P., Lam, S. L., Lam, J., & McNaught, C. (2008). Usability and usefulness of eBooks on PPCs: How students' opinions vary over time. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1). : 
https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1179
Ling, C., Harnish, D., & Shehab, R. (2014). Educational Apps: Using Mobile Applications to Enhance Student Learning of Statistical Concepts. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 24(5), 532-543. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.20550
Millar, M., & Schrier, T. (2015). Digital or Printed Textbooks: Which do Students Prefer and Why? Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 15(2), 166-185. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2015.1026474
Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates' Academic Reading Format Preferences and Behaviors. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301-311. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.03.009
Muir, L., & Hawes, G. (2013). The Case for e-Book Literacy: Undergraduate Students' Experience with e-Books for Course Work. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 39(3), 260-274. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.01.002
Rockinson- Szapkiw, A. J., Courduff, J., Carter, K., & Bennett, D. (2013). Electronic versus traditional print textbooks: A comparison study on the influence of university students' learning. Computers & Education, 63, 259-266. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.022
Teri, S., Acai, A., Griffith, D., Mahmoud, Q., Ma, D. W. L., & Newton, G. (2014). Student use and pedagogical impact of a mobile learning application. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(2), 121-135. : 
https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20771
Wang, S., & Bai, X. (2016). University Students Awareness, Usage and Attitude Towards E-books: Experience from China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 42(3), 247-258. : 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2016.01.001
Go to top
randomness