BUILDING UP THE RELEVANCE IN ECONOMICS EDUCATION AND ASSESSING ITS EFFECT

BUILDING UP THE RELEVANCE IN ECONOMICS EDUCATION AND ASSESSING ITS EFFECT

Y. Kuo (2023).  BUILDING UP THE RELEVANCE IN ECONOMICS EDUCATION AND ASSESSING ITS EFFECT. 302-311.

Even though economics is still mostly being taught in a traditional manner, there seems to be increasing emphasis on the role of concept relevance in better teaching. At the present, numerous teaching methods are being used in order to keep the coursework interesting as well as relevant. Be that as it may, game-based instruction or online teaching is more challenging to be used when teaching certain subjects than others. This paper proposes a novel teaching method which is a mixture of drama-based teaching, field survey, debating and online video discussions, the combination of which would promote the relevance of the subject being taught as it engages the students in the classroom. In this paper, we tailor a curriculum based on concrete and hands-on experience to promote collaborative learning and cultivate critical thinking. Furthermore, another goal of this study is to assess how students’ learning styles respond to different teaching methods. We attempt to understand the interaction between teaching pedagogy and students’ learning styles in order to improve economics education. The study follows a deductive reasoning approach based on data gathered through distribution of two questionnaires among students at an economics class in Feng Chi University; one before and one after the final test. According to the findings, our teaching design has the potential to increase the students’ level of perceived relevance between what they learn in class and what they observe in real life.

Authors (New): 
Yu-Chen Kuo
Pages: 
302-311
Affiliations: 
Feng Chia University, Taiwan
Keywords: 
pedagogy
interactive learning
subject relevance
economics teaching
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Becker, W. E. (2003). How to make economics the sexy social science (From Chronicle of Higher Education). Southern Economic Journal, 70(1), 195-198.: 
Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (1996). Chalk and talk: A national survey on teaching undergraduate economics. American Economic Review, 86(2), 448-453.: 
Becker, W. E., & Watts, M. (2001). Teaching economics at the start of the 21st century: Still chalk-and-talk. American Economic Review, 91(2), 446-451.: 
Charkins, R. J., O’Toole, D. M., & Wetzel, J. N. (1985). Linking teacher and student learning styles with student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Economic Education, 16(2), 111-120.: 
Hoyt, G. M., & McGoldrick, K. (2019). 50 years of economic instruction in the Journal of Economic Education. Journal of Economic Education, 50(2), 168-195.: 
Huet, G., Sanschagrin, B., Gagnon, M., Spooner, D., Vadean, A., & Camarero, R. (2008). The assessment of student teamwork to promote CDIO learning objectives. In Proceedings of the CDIO Conference.: 
Jensen, E. J., & Owen, A. L. (2001). Pedagogy, gender, and interest in economics. Journal of Economic Education, 32(4), 323-343.: 
Kolb, D. A. (1985). The Learning Style Inventory: Technical manual. Boston: McBer. Lage, M. J., Platt, G. J., & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: A gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31(1), 30-43.: 
Liang, Z., Deng, H., & Tao, J. (2011). Teaching examples and pedagogy of mechanical manufacture based on the CDIO-based teaching method. Procedia Engineering, 15, 4084-4088.: 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., ... & Kamp, A. (2019). Towards CDIO standards 3.0. In Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference (pp. 512-529).: 
Zhang, H. (2016). Accommodating different learning styles in the teaching of economics: with emphasis on fleming and Mills’s sensory-based learning style typology. Applied Economics and Finance, 4(1), 72-83.: 
Ziegert, A. L. (2000). The role of personality temperament and student learning in principles of economics: Further evidence. Journal of Economic Education, 31(4), 307-322.: 
Go to top
randomness