Engineering Thermodynamics is an important engineering discipline in universities, concerned mainly with traditional and alternative sources of energy in terms of availability, movement, and conversion. However, much discontent can be found in the literature regarding teaching deficiencies and recognized learning difficulties associated with this subject. Many attempts have been tried, such as the blended learning approach, active learning techniques, computer-based instruction, critical thinking enhancement and the use of technology such as a virtual laboratory. In the present contribution, the principles of the constructivist approach are integrated in order to enhance students’ active learning. This is very relevant when using the CDIO approach which emphasizes active learning (CDIO Standard 8). The new constructivist learning elements include a much greater emphasis on coaching, scaffolding, and modelling. The improvement of student learning and retention of concepts after integrating the principles of the constructivist approach is measured using a pre- post-assessment experiment. The findings encourage engineering educators and educational institutions to prefer constructivist principles over traditional principles to (1) increase more effectively students’ interest in Engineering Thermodynamics, (2) ensure more effective learning of the general understanding of Engineering Thermodynamics, and (3) support more effectively students’ learning of knowledge and skills required to solve more difficult Engineering Thermodynamic problems.
Pages:
951-965
Affiliations:
Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait
Nazarbeyev University, Astana, Kazakhstan
Keywords:
Constructivist principles
Learning effectiveness
Active learning
Thermodynamics
CDIO Standard 8
Year:
2023
Reference:
Abulencia, J. P., Vigeant, M. A. & Silverstein, D. L. (2012). Using Video Media to Enhance Conceptual Learning in an Undergraduate Thermodynamics Course. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, San Antonio, TX, 10-13th June, 2012.:
Anderson, E. E., Sharma, M. P. & Taraban, R. (2002). Application of active learning techniques to computer-based instruction of introductory thermodynamics. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, 16-19th June, Montreal, Canada.:
Applefield, J. M., Huber, R. & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in Theory and Practice: Toward a Better Understanding. The High School Journal, 1(2), pp. 35–53.:
Ariza, J.A. & Baez, H. (2022). Understanding the role of single‐board computers in engineering and computer science education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(1), pp.304-329.:
Beerenwinkel, A. & Von Arx, M. (2016). Constructivism in Practice: An Exploratory Study of Teaching Patterns and Student Motivation in Physics Classrooms in Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Research in Science Education, 47(2), pp. 237–255.:
Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1999). In search of meaning: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.:
Bullen, P. & Russell, M. (2007). A blended learning approach to teaching first year engineering degree students. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Education - ICEE 2007, Coimbra, Portugal, 3-7th Sept., 2007.:
Cabo, A. & Klaassen, R. (2018). Active Learning in Redesigning Mathematics Courses for Engineering Students, Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa Institute of Technology, Kanazawa, Japan, June 28 – July 2, 2018.:
Cobourn, W. G. & Lindauer, G. C. A. (1994). A Flexible Multimedia Instructional Material Module for Introductory Thermodynamics. Journal of Engineering Education, 83, 1994, pp. 271-277.:
Cooper, P. A. (1993). Paradigm shifts in designed education: From Behaviorism to cognitivism to constructivism. Educational Technology, 33, 1993, pp. 12–19.:
Gamarra, M., Dominguez, A., Velazquez, J. and Páez, H., 2022. A gamification strategy in engineering education—A case study on motivation and engagement. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 30(2), pp.472-482.:
Grigull, U. (1990). Students Views on Learning Thermodynamics. Workshop on Second Law of Thermodynamics, Erciyes U.- T.I.B.T.D., Kayseri, 27-30th August, 1990.:
Hassan, O. & Mat, R. (2005). A comparative study of two different approaches in teaching thermodynamics. Proceedings of 2005 Regional Conference on Engineering Education, Johor.:
Hauschildt, J. & Hamel, W. (1978). Empirische forschung zur zielbildung in organisationen. Hamburger Jahrbuch für Wirtschafts- und Gesellschaftspolitik, 23, pp. 237-250.:
Hessenauer, P. R., Adair, D. & Jaeger, M. (2019).“The principles of psychological constructivism applied to the teaching and learning of numerical methods for engineers” (UNPUBLISHED):
Holman, J. & Pilling, G. (2004). Thermodynamics in Context: A Case Study of Contextualized Teaching for Undergraduates. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(3), pp. 373–375.:
Holton, D. & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), pp. 127–143.:
Jasien, P. G. & Oberem, G. E. (2002). Understanding of Elementary Concepts in Heat and Temperature among College Students and K-12 Teachers. Journal of Chemical Education, 79, 7, 2002, pp. 889-895.:
Jonassen, D., Mates, T. & McAleese, R. (1993). A manifesto for a constructivist approach to uses of technology in higher education: in Designing environments for constructivist learning, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp.231-247.:
Jonassen, D. H. (2009). Constructivist learning environments on the web: Engaging students in meaningful learning, Pennsylvania State University. Retrieved April 2009, from 10.1.1.137.618.pdf.:
Lape, N. K. (2011). Tiered Scaffolding of Problem-Based Learning Techniques in a Thermodynamics Course. Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Vancouver, Canada, 26-29th June, 2011.:
Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitude. Archives of Psychology, 22(140).:
Loverude, M. E., Kautz, C. H. & Heron, P. R. (2002). Student Understanding of the First Law of Thermodynamics: Relating Work to the Adiabatic Compression of an Ideal Gas. American Journal of Physics, 70, 2, 2002, p. 137.:
Manteufel, R. D. (1999). A Spiral Approach for Mechanical Engineering Thermodynamics. Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference, Nashville, TN, 14-19th November 1999.:
Meltzer, D. E. (2004). Investigation of Student’s Reasoning Regarding Heat, Work and the First Law of Thermodynamics in an Introductory Calculus-Based General Physics Course. American Journal of Physics, 72, 11, 2004, pp. 1432-1446.:
Meltzer, D. E. (2006). Investigation of Student Learning in Thermodynamics and Implementations for Instruction in Chemistry and Engineering. Proceedings of Physics Education Research Conference, Syracuse, New York, 26-27th July, 2006.:
Mulop, N., Khairiyah, M. Y. & Zaidatun, T. (2012). A review on enhancing the teaching and learning of thermodynamics. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 56, pp. 703–712.:
Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimensions of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), pp. 423-451.:
Pfahl, D., Laitenberger, O., Dorsch, J. & Krivobokova, T. (2004). Evaluating the learning effectiveness and using simulations in software management education; results from a twice replicated experiment. Information & Software Technology, 46, pp. 127-147.:
Prince, M. J., Vigeant, M. A. S. & Nottis, K. (2009). A Preliminary Study on the Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Activities for Addressing Misconceptions of Undergraduate Engineering Students. Education for Chemical Engineers, 4, 2009, pp. 29-40.:
Proulx, J. (2006). A re-equilibration and clarification of the concepts, and some potential implications for teaching and pedagogy. Radical Pedagogy, 8(1), pp. 65–85.:
Puntambekar, S. & Hübscher, R. (2005). Tools for scaffolding students in a complex learning environment: What have we gained and what have we missed. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), pp. -12.:
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.:
Soliman, M., Pesyridis, A., Dalaymani-Zad, D., Gronfula, M. and Kourmpetis, M., (2021). The application of virtual reality in engineering education. Applied Sciences, 11(6), p.2879.:
Van de Pol, J., Volman, M. & Buishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), pp. 271–296.:
Wink, D. J. (2014). Constructivist Frameworks in Chemistry Education and the Problem of the “Thumb in the Eye”. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 2014, pp. 617-622.:
Zahn, E. (1993). Marketing- und Vertriebscontrolling: Produkt- und Sortimentspolitik, Distributionspolitik, Preispolitik, Werbung, Verkaufsförderung, Konkurrenz-Analyse. Landsberg: Moderne Industrie.:
on November 27, 2023 - 07:18 frebyst
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
