ETHICS, AI, AND SOCIETY: SHAPING RESPONSIBLE AI ENGINEERS WITH CDIO FRAMEWORK

ETHICS, AI, AND SOCIETY: SHAPING RESPONSIBLE AI ENGINEERS WITH CDIO FRAMEWORK

N. AJAILIA, M. Zéraï, N. DEBBABI, A. DAMERGI, M. DCHICHA (2024).  ETHICS, AI, AND SOCIETY: SHAPING RESPONSIBLE AI ENGINEERS WITH CDIO FRAMEWORK.

This paper describes the development and implementation of a novel course entitled "Ethics, AI, and Society," designed within the CDIO framework to provide ethical education to Artificial Intelligence (AI) graduating engineering students. As AI technologies increasingly permeate various facets of society, the imperative for ethical acumen among engineers comes to the fore. In this regard, the module aims to equip AI engineering students with a holistic understanding of ethical dimensions, societal repercussions, and regulations associated with creating and implementing AI technologies. An interactive pedagogical strategy underpins the module, engaging students with a blend of theoretical discussions and experiential learning fostering a culture of critical thinking, collaboration, and lifelong learning. Building on this foundation, the course thoroughly explores philosophical basis and navigates a spectrum of real-world ethical dilemmas. Topics such as bias mitigation, data privacy, and the broader societal impacts of AI in various domains, including healthcare and economy, are explored in depth. The curriculum is further enriched by a series of diverse guest speakers, each hailing from unique professional background. These experts bring their distinctive perspectives and insights, thereby greatly enhancing the students' comprehension and engagement with the course material. This approach broadens the learning experience and deepens the understanding of the complex interaction between AI, ethics, and society. To ensure that this content leads to concrete learning outcomes and practical skills, the course's design and implementation strictly adhere to the CDIO standards. Preliminary feedback indicates a significant enhancement in students' capacity to tackle complex ethical dilemmas and an increased consciousness of the societal impact of AI. By presenting the course design, delivery methods, and initial outcomes, this paper aspires to serve as a guiding document for educators and institutions aiming to seamlessly integrate ethics into the foundation of AI engineering education.

Authors (New): 
Nadia AJAILIA
Mourad Zéraï
Nehla DEBBABI
Ashraf DAMERGI
Mabrouka DCHICHA
Affiliations: 
Civil Engineering Department, Mathematical Department, ESPRIT school of Engineering
Communication Management Economy and Law Department, ESPRIT school of Engineering
Keywords: 
Ethical AI Education
CDIO standards
engineering curriculum
Critical thinking
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Aközer, M., & Aközer, E. (2017). Ethics teaching in higher education for principled reasoning: A gateway for reconciling scientific practice with ethical deliberation. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(3), 825-860.: 
Aler Tubella, A., Mora-Cantallops, M., & Nieves, J. C. (2024). How to teach responsible AI in Higher Education: challenges and opportunities. Ethics and Information Technology, 26(1), 3.: 
Antoniou, J. (2021). Dealing with emerging ai technologies: Teaching and learning ethics for AI. Quality of Experience and Learning in Information Systems: Incorporating Learning and Ethics into Characterizations of Quality of Experience, 79-93.: 
Cath, C. (2018). Governing artificial intelligence: Ethical, legal and technical opportunities and challenges. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer.: 
Dignum, V. (2018). Ethics in artificial intelligence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 1-3.: 
Garrett, N., Beard, N., & Fiesler, C. (2020). More than 'If Time Allows': The role of ethics in AI education. Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society.: 
Hagendorff, T. (2020). The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines. Minds and Machines, 30, 99-120.: 
Jobin, A., Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2019). The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nature Machine Intelligence.: 
Krakowski, A., Greenwald, E., Hurt, T., Nonnecke, B., & Cannady, M. (2022, June). Authentic Integration of Ethics and AI through Socio Technical, Problem-Based Learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 36, No. 11, pp. 12774-12782).: 
Malmqvist J, Edström K, Rosén A, Hugo R, Campbell D, (2020). A First Set of Optional CDIO Standards for Adoption, Proceedings of the 16th International CDIO Conference, hosted on-line by Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 8 11, 2020.: 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., Vigild, M. E., Munkebo Hussman, P., Kamp, A., & More Authors (2019). Towards CDIO standards 3.0. Paper presented at 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark.: 
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A. et al (2022). The CDIO Syllabus 3.0 - An Updated Statement of Goals. Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik Iceland: 
McSharry, P. E. (2023). Promoting AI Ethics Through Awareness and Case Studies. In AI Ethics in Higher Education: Insights from Africa and Beyond (pp. 67-84). Cham: Springer International Publishing.: 
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From what to how: An initial review of publicly available AI ethics tools, methods and research to translate principles into practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2141–2168.: 
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2021). Ethics as a service: A pragmatic operationalisation of AI ethics. Minds and Machines, 31, 239–260.: 
Ryan, M. (2020). In AI we trust: Ethics, artificial intelligence, and reliability. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26, 2747–2762.: 
Saad, M. (2023). Educating for AI Ethics: Integrating Moral Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence Curricula. Social Sciences Spectrum, 2(1), 58-64.: 
Walsh, G., Stogiannos, N., Van de Venter, R., Rainey, C., Tam, W., McFadden, S., ... & Malamateniou, C. (2023). Responsible AI practice and AI education are central to AI implementation: a rapid review for all medical imaging professionals in Europe. BJR| open, 5(1), 20230033.: 
Whittlestone, J., Nyrup, R., Alexandrova, A., Dihal, K., & Cave, S. (2019). Ethical and societal implications of algorithms, data, and artificial intelligence: A roadmap for research. Nuffield Foundation.: 
Go to top
randomness