MAPPING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACROSS DISCIPLINES: INSIGHTS FOR APPLICATION IN EDUCATION

MAPPING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACROSS DISCIPLINES: INSIGHTS FOR APPLICATION IN EDUCATION

D. Flores-Bueno, S. Gomez-Puente, I. Castillo-Martínez, O. Vite (2024).  MAPPING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ACROSS DISCIPLINES: INSIGHTS FOR APPLICATION IN EDUCATION.

Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIEd) has gained attention in the last years. The application of AI in education has demonstrated benefits for both teachers and students as learning processes can be stimulated. As AI evolves rapidly, there is a need to investigate quantitively and qualitatively what the gains are that may be interesting for the field of education. The  purpose of this study is to conduct a mapping exercise in order to identify the advantages of AI and make recommendations for education. In this research, N=159 articles from Scopus and N=97 articles from Web of Science databases were preliminary selected as sources for this study. Internal and external criteria was applied to make a final selection of the articles (N=74) from different disciplines such as health, engineering, electronics, mathematics, etc. Mapping indicators included among others, impact factor, research methods, disciplines, among others. Results indicated that most of the articles refer to studies from institutions all over around the world in a broad variety of fields, being ChatGPT a common chatbox used. Research focused mainly on qualitative and descriptive methods.  Reasons for this may be that the AIEd, and more specifically, ChatGPT, are newly AI tools that still need further application and exploration with quantitative methods to be able to provide results. Most of the articles mentioned the need for further exploration and adjustments in current AI practices. Conclusions from this study indicate that the integration of AI technologies, such as ChatGPT, in educational settings may positively impact student engagement and learning outcomes. The use of AI-based tools for assessment and feedback in education may lead to more personalized and effective interventions to address individual student needs.

Authors (New): 
Daniel Flores-Bueno
Sonia M. Gomez-Puente
Isolda Margarita Castillo-Martínez
Omar Vite
Affiliations: 
Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Peru
Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
Tecnologico de Monterrey, Mexico
Keywords: 
Artificial Intelligence
ChatGPT
Mapping
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Chen, X., Zou, D., Xie, H., Cheng, G., & Liu, C. (2022). Two Decades of Artificial Intelligence in Education: Contributors, Collaborations, Research Topics, Challenges, and Future Directions. Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 25, No 1, pp-28-47.: 
Burger, B., Kanbach, D.K., Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Corvello, V. (2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 26 No. 7, pp. 233-241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156: 
Lahat, A., Shachar, E., Avidan, B., Glicksberg, B. S., & Klang, E. (2023). Evaluating the use of large language model in identifying top research questions in gastroenterology. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4164. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31412-2 : 
Májovský, M., Černý, M., Kasal, M., Komarc, M., & Netuka, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence can generate fraudulent but authentic-looking scientific medical articles: Pandora’s box has been opened. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e46924. https://doi.org/10.2196/46924: 
Wen, J., & Wang, W. (2023). The future of ChatGPT in academic research and publishing: A commentary for clinical and translational medicine. Clinical and translational medicine, 13(3), e1207. https://doi.org/10.1002/ctm2.1207: 
Homolak J. (2023). Opportunities and risks of ChatGPT in medicine, science, and academic publishing: a modern Promethean dilemma. Croatian medical journal, 64(1), pp. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2023.64.1 : 
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, pp. 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4: 
Mohet, D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., & Altman D.G., (2009). The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097 : 
Yongtao, Z. (2019). Research on the application of artificial intelligence technology in scientific research management in colleges and universities. 12th International Conference on Intelligent Computation Technology and Automation (ICICTA).: 
Go to top
randomness