Reflective Diaries – A Tool for Promoting and Probing Student Learning

Reflective Diaries – A Tool for Promoting and Probing Student Learning

P. Wallin, T. Adawi, J. Gold (2016).  Reflective Diaries – A Tool for Promoting and Probing Student Learning. 11.

For engineering students to be able to effectively solve problems in their future profession, it is essential that they learn to reflect on their own learning, dissect their own thoughts, argue with themselves possible alternatives, and think about how their experiences will shape their future [1]. This process is referred to as metacognition – the awareness of one’s own thinking and learning [2]. It has therefore been proposed that active learning methods should not only encourage students to reflect on the content of learning, but also the process of learning [3]. Tanner [4] provides a good overview of different active learning methods that promote metacognition. One interesting method to promote the development of metacognitive skills is to let students write reflective diaries [5].

At the same time, reflective diaries allow for in-depth probing of student learning. One of the aims of engineering education research is to better understand students’ learning processes. It is therefore important to be able to collect data continuously, for example during a course, rather than at the end [6]. In contrast to observational data, revealing how students behave and interact, reflective diaries provide information about the students’ thoughts and reflections on situations – in some way similar to interviews, but closer to the moment that they occur [7]. Reflective diaries as a research method have been used predominately in health related studies, but also in educational research [8].

In this case study, we describe and evaluate the implementation of reflective diaries in a tissue engineering course in the Biotechnology Masters Program at Chalmers University of Technology. A central component of the course is an authentic research project, and reflective diaries were introduced to help the students to reflect on their project work as well as their own learning and development. The reflective diaries were also used as an important data source to study students’ learning pathways in the course [9]. The students got a set of prompts to write about at the end of each week. The prompts alternated between focusing on more general learning experiences and challenges (even weeks) and on the different phases of the project (odd weeks). By varying the prompts, we were able to provide different stimuli and avoid automation and fatigue in writing the reflective diaries [10]. We will use extracts from the reflective diaries and individual interviews with the students to demonstrate the development of metacognitive skills, discuss how students experienced writing reflective diaries and offer some pointers for implementing reflective diaries.

The advantage of the twin dimensions of reflective diaries, “promoting” and “probing”, is that they initially can be used to support student learning and subsequently provide teachers with a stepping-stone for engaging with the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Reflective diaries are particularly well-suited for project-based courses, helping students to develop metacognitive skills and preparing them for future tasks by facilitating a transfer of learning from the project work. In addition, reflective diaries allow insight into the students’ work on the projects that is otherwise not visible to the teacher.

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Patric Wallin
Tom Adawi
Julie Gold
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Reflective diaries
inquiry-based learning
self-regulated learning
metacognition
case study
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2016
Reference: 
Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(6), 445–457. : 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. : 
Davis, E. a. (2000). Scaffolding students’ knowledge integration: prompts for reflection in KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819–837. : 
English, M. C., & Kitsantas, A. (2013). Supporting student self-regulated learning in problem- and project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(2), 128–150. : 
Fabriz, S., Ewijk, C. D. Van, Poarch, G., & Büttner, G. (2014). Fostering self-monitoring of university students by means of a standardized learning journal - A longitudinal study with process analyses. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(2), 239–255. : 
Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2004). The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Part 1: Models and Challenges. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(4), 269–277. : 
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. : 
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., Jacobsen, D. R., & Bullock, T. L. (1990). Tools for learning: A guide to teaching study skills. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. : 
Ifenthaler, D. (2012). Determining the effectiveness of prompts for self-regulated learning in problemsolving scenarios. Educational Technology and Society, 15(1), 38–52. : 
Jarvis, P. (2001). Journal writing in health education. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, (90), 49.: 
Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday Problem Solving in Engineering: Lessons for Engineering Educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151. : 
Kenny, S. S., Alberts, B., Booth, W. C., Glaser, M., Glassick, C. E., Ikenberry, S. O., … Yang, C. N. (1998). Reinventing undergraduate education: A blueprint for America’s research universities. (The Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University, Ed.). New York, NY: Stony Brook. : 
Koro-Ljungberg, M., & Douglas, E. P. (2008). State of Qualitative Research in Engineering Education: Meta-Analysis of JEE Articles, 2005-2006. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(2), 163–175. : 
Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-Impact Educational Practices. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities. : 
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as a design science: Building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. New York, NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.: 
Lee, V. S. (2012). What is inquiry-guided learning? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2012(129), 5–14.: 
Lohmann, J. R. (2008). Global engieering excellence: the role of educational research and development. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia, 27, 33–44. : 
Moon, J. (2003). Learning journals and logs , Reflective Diaries. Exeter, UK: University of Exeter - Center for Teaching and Learning. : 
Prince, M., & Felder, R. (2006). Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. : 
Rieman, J. (1993). The diary study: a workplace-oriented research tool to guide laboratory efforts. In Proceedings of the INTERACT’93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 321–326). ACM. : 
Schmitz, B., & Wiese, B. S. (2006). New perspectives for the evaluation of training sessions in selfregulated learning: Time-series analyses of diary data. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 64–96.: 
Tanner, K. D. (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sciences Education, 11(2), 113–20. : 
Vos, H., & de Graaff, E. (2004). Developing metacognition: a basis for active learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 29(4), 543–548. : 
Walker, S. E. (2006). Journal writing as a teaching technique to promote reflection. Journal of Athletic Training, 41(2), 216–221. : 
Wallin, P., Adawi, T., & Gold, J. (2015). Linking teaching and research in an undergraduate course and exploring student learning experiences. Submitted for Publication. : 
Wallin, P., Gold, J., & Adawi, T. (2013). Tasting Genuine Research in a Course on Tissue Engineering. In 41th Annual SEFI Conference, Leuven, Belgium. : 
Wedelin, D., & Adawi, T. (2014). Teaching Mathematical Modelling and Problem Solving - A Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Mathematics and Engineering Education, 4(5), 49–55. : 
Go to top
randomness