The CDIO Syllabus and Outcomes-Based Assessment: A Case Study of a Canadian Mechanical Engineering Program

The CDIO Syllabus and Outcomes-Based Assessment: A Case Study of a Canadian Mechanical Engineering Program

R. Brennan, R. Hugo (2010).  The CDIO Syllabus and Outcomes-Based Assessment: A Case Study of a Canadian Mechanical Engineering Program. 10.

 

This paper presents the results of a pilot study on using the CDIO syllabus as a starting point for Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB) graduate attribute assessment. The CDIO syllabus provides a comprehensive set of engineering learning outcomes that can be used to move from general performance objectives (i.e., CEAB graduate attributes) to specific learning outcomes (i.e., CDIO syllabus). In this paper, the authors use this mapping in combination with an introduce-teach-utilize (ITU) analysis as a basis for in-program graduate attribute assessment of the Schulich School of Engineering’s B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering program. The results of the case study show that the ITU analysis provides an effective tool to align learning outcomes to a specific engineering curriculum.

 

Authors (New): 
Robert W Brennan
Ronald J Hugo
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
University of Calgary, Canada
Keywords: 
accreditation
Graduate Attributes
outcomes-based assessment
CDIO Syllabus
Year: 
2010
Reference: 
Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, Website, http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/ pr_accreditation.cfm, accessed 27 Jan 2010. : 
Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, Accreditation Criteria and Procedures, Engineers Canada, available online at http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/files/Accreditation_Criteria_ Procedures_2009.pdf, accessed 27 Jan 2010. : 
Engineering Education Assessment Methodologies and Curricula Innovation, EC2000 Outcome Attributes, available online at http://www.engrng.pitt.edu/~ec2000/downloads/Attributes.pdf, accessed 27 Jan 2010. : 
Frank B., “Development of processes and criteria for CEAB graduate attribute assessment”, CDEN/C2E2 2009 Conference, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, 27-29 July 2009. : 
Rogers G., Assessment Planning Flow Chart, http://www.abet.org/flow_chart.shtml, accessed 22 April 2010. : 
ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: 2010-2011 Criteria http://www.abet.org/ forms.shtml, accessed 22 April 2010. : 
Crawley E., Malmqvist J., Ostlund S. and Brodeur D., Rethinking Engineering Education: the CDIO Approach, Springer, 2007. : 
Cloutier G., Hugo R. and Sellens R., “Mapping the relationship between the CDIO Syllabus and the 2008 CEAB Graduate Attributes”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010 : 
Newman D.J. and Amir A.R., “Innovative first year aerospace design course at MIT”, Journal of Engineering Education, July 2001, pp. 375-381. : 
Gustafsson G., Newman D.J., Stafstrom S. and Wallin H.P., “First year introductory courses as a means to develop conceive - design - implement - operate skills in engineering education programs”, SEFI Annual Conference, September 2002.: 
Go to top
randomness