Designing for Student Success: A Materials Science Case Study

Designing for Student Success: A Materials Science Case Study

M. Tarkanian, M. Caulfield (2013).  Designing for Student Success: A Materials Science Case Study. 7.

Materials scientists are responsible for innovation in a variety of areas, including manufacturing processes, sustainability, and new product development. To be successful, a materials scientist must understand not only the relevant technology, but also how its implementation is affected by patent law, the economics of manufacturing, and effective communication with the public, other scientists, and engineers. At Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the Materials Project Laboratory course (3.042), prepares students by providing interdisciplinary training focused on real-world challenges. Students solve problems by creating new materials that address specific needs in medicine, construction, consumer goods and other areas; they execute a project from theory to patent and marketing research, culminating in the production and presentation of working materials. Along the way, students write and speak about their plans and progress, communicating on a regular basis with experienced professionals in their field. Because technical work, research, and communications are inextricably intertwined, they gain practice in working as professionals, solving problems not only in the lab but also  n teamwork and leadership. Having experienced the challenges of working on complex problems, they complete the course ready to  dvance knowledge in the development of new materials.

 

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013

Authors (New): 
Michael J. Tarkanian
Mary E. Caulfield
Pages: 
7
Affiliations: 
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Keywords: 
Project-based classes
Engineering pedagogy
Materials Science Education
Technical Communications pedagogy
Teamwork and management education
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Crawley, E.F., Lucas, W.A., Malmqvist, J., Brodeur, D.A., “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education,” Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 – 23, 2011, (http://www.cdio.org/files/project/file/cdio_syllabus_v2.pdf, accessed March 22, 2013).: 
National Science Foundation, “The Future of Materials Science and Materials Science Education: A Report from the Workshop on Materials Science and Materials Engineering Education,” Arlington, 2008, (http://www.nsf.gov/mps/dmr/mse_081709.pdf, accessed January 25, 2013).: 
Felder R.M. and Brent R., “Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria,” v. 92, 2003, 7-25.: 
Dutson A. J., Todd R. H., Magleby S. P., and Sorensen C.D., “A Review of the Literature on Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 86, 1997, 17-28.: 
Farr J.V., Lee M.A., Metro R.A., Sutton J.P., “Using a Systematic Engineering Design Process to Conduct Undergraduate Engineering Management Capstone Projects,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 90, 2001, 193-197.: 
National Academy of Engineering, “Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education,” National Academies Press, Washington, 2012.: 
Koretsky M., Kelly C., Gummer, E., “Student Perceptions of Learning In the Laboratory: Comparison of Industrially Situated Virtual Laboratories to Capstone Physical Laboratories,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 100, 2011, 540-573.: 
Go to top