Student Learning Experiences Concerning Enterprise & Societal Context in CDIO-based Education

Student Learning Experiences Concerning Enterprise & Societal Context in CDIO-based Education

D. Bienkowska, S. Karabag (2013).  Student Learning Experiences Concerning Enterprise & Societal Context in CDIO-based Education. 10.

The CDIO Syllabus includes a section dealing with Enterprise, Societal and Environmental Context (Section 4) that was extended in 2011, which implies its growing importance. The goals and content of this section differ from those of the core engineering sections and include awareness of the impact of engineering on society and environment as well as management of people and resources. It may be challenging to teach and learn these topics within the timeframe of already dense educational programs. In this paper we present both the ways of incorporating this section into curricula and a survey of student learning experiences using engineering programs at Linköping University, Sweden, as the empirical setting. Our study covers five engineering programs: Applied Physics & Electrical Engineering; Computer Science and Engineering; Engineering Biology; Industrial Engineering & Management; and Mechanical Engineering. The results show that some of the programs incorporate Section 4 topics mainly through project courses where student teams work on specified assignments within their programs’ focus area (such as software) while training their project management skills and gaining insights into business and societal context. Other programs, especially Industrial Engineering & Management, include several courses where Section 4 topics are learned through lectures, seminars, experiential learning and less extensive group assignments. The results from our survey of students’ learning experiences show that students vary in their evaluation with regard to section 4 topics, with for example Mechanical Engineering students valuing their program higher than others when it comes to their learning about responsibilities of engineers to the society. Industrial Engineering & Management students on the other hand value their program higher than others concerning learning of topics such as business context. We also show that extra-curricular activities in the form of active engagement in students clubs at the university are beneficial for developing leadership abilities during engineering education.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Dzamila Bienkowska
Solmaz Filiz Karabag
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Södertörn University, Sweden
Keywords: 
CDIO Syllabus
learning experience
Societal context
Soft Skills
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Crawley E. F. The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, 2001, http://www.cdio.org/files/CDIO_Syllabus_Report.pdf visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvists J., Lucas W.A., and Brodeur D.R., The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education, 2011, http://www.cdio.org/files/project/file/cdio_syllabus_v2.pdf visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Grinter, L. E. “Report of the Committee on Evaluation of Engineering Education,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 44, 1955, 25-60. : 
Shuman L.J., Besterfield-Sacre M., and McGourty J., "The ABET 'Professional Skills' - Can they be taught? Can they be assessed?," Journal of Engineering Education, v. 94, 2005, 41 - 55. : 
Nguyen, D.Q., “The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students,” Global Journal of Engineering Education, v. 2, 1998. 65-75. : 
Petty I., “Vision 2020—education in the next millennium”. In Hagström A., (ed.), Engineering Education: Rediscovering the Centre. Proceedings of the SEFI Annual Conference, Winterthur and Zürich, 1999, 27–35. : 
Duderstadt, J. J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research, and Education; the Millennium Project, The University of Michigan, 2008, http://milproj.ummu.umich.edu/publications/engflex%20report/download/engflex%20report.pdf visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Borrego M., and Newswander L. K., “Characteristics of Successful Cross-Disciplinary Engineering Education Collaborations,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 97, 2008, 123-134. : 
Dym C. L., Agogino A. M., Eris O., Frey D.D., and Leifer L J. “Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 94, 2005, 103-120. : 
NAE, The Grand Challenges for Engineering as Determined by a Committee of the National Academy of Engineering. 2012, http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/challenges.aspx visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Pfatteicher S.K.A., “Teaching vs. preaching: EC2000 and the engineering ethics dilemma,” Journal of Engineering Education, v. 90, 2001, 137–142. : 
Rompelman O. “Assessment of student learning: evolution of objectives in engineering education and the consequences for assessment, European Journal of Engineering Education, v. 25, 2000, 339-350. : 
Felder R.M, and Brent R.“Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria," Journal of Engineering Education, v. 92, 2003, 7-26.: 
Hilerman E.D., and Groll E.A., “The Purdue GEARE Program,” Presented at the Seventh Annual Colloquiium on International Engineering Education, Providence, R.I., Oct. 2, 2004.: 
Smith, A., Banzaert, A., and Susnowitz, S., “The MIT ideas competition: Promoting innovations for public service,” (CD) Proceedings, 2003 Frontiers in Education Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. http://www.icee.usm.edu/ICEE/conferences/FIEC2003/papers/1401.pdf visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Oakes W.C., Coyle E.J., and Jamieson L.H., “EPICS: A Model of Service Learning in the Engineering Curriculum,” Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3630, 2000. : 
Knight, D.W., Carlson, L.E., and Sullivan, J.F., “Staying in Engineering: Impact of a Hands-On, Team-Based, First-Year Projects Course on Student Retention,” (CD) Proceedings, ASEE Conference and Exhibition, Session 3553, 2003. http://128.138.195.20/images/uploads/about_us/publications/Papers/ASEE%2003%20Retention%2 0GEEN%201400%20Proceedings.pdf visited on January 17, 2013 : 
Tchibozo G., “Extra-curricular activity and the transition from higher education to work: A survey of graduates in the United Kingdom,” Higher Education Quarterly, v. 61, 2007, 37–56.: 
Temizer L., and Turkyilmaz A., “Implementation of student satisfaction index model in higher education institutions”, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 46, 2012, 3802 – 3806. : 
Wiklund I., Lindblad E., and Gunnarsson S., “Using an alumni survey as a tool for program evaluation”, 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2005, http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/CDIO_paper13.pdf visited on January 17, 2013. : 
Linköping University, Annual Report of Linköping University (in Swedish: Årsredovisning 2011 Linköping Universitet, 2011. : 
Go to top
randomness