Students' and Teachers’ Perceptions of CDIO-based Communication Activities

Students' and Teachers’ Perceptions of CDIO-based Communication Activities

C. Carlsson, A. Eriksson (2013).  Students' and Teachers’ Perceptions of CDIO-based Communication Activities. 12.

CDIO-based curriculum and course design involves many components that need to be integrated in projects, laboratory work and classroom activities. Communication is one such component that is both an integrated skill as well as a cognitive tool throughout the CDIO-cycle of any activity. However, comparatively little research has been done on students’ actual perception of communication and communication activities in integrated content and language (ICL) environments. In this study, student statements about communication and communication activities have been collected via interviews and surveys from students at a mechanical engineering programme. These statements are compared with statements from content teachers at the same programme. Results suggest that students and engineering faculty share a basic perspective that communication activities should focus on a few key genres that students will use in their future profession. Consequently, there seem to be good reasons for identifying and practising the use of so-called apprenticeship genres. However, the focus on a few genres is problematized as some students show frustration when encountering genres unfamiliar to them. The paper therefore also discusses the potential need for a role where communication teachers facilitate not only communication activities but also students’ perception of communication and communication activities in order to better prepare them to confidentlyengage in various types of communicative situations both in their further studies and in their future roles as engineers.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Carl Johan Carlsson
Andreas Eriksson
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
integrating content and language (ICL)
student and teacher perceptions
Communication
genre
communicating in the discipline
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Lillis, T. & Rai, L. A Case Study of Research-based Collaboration around Writing in Social Work. Across the Disciplines, 8(3), 2011.: 
Barrie, S. C. Understanding what we mean by generic attributes of graduates. Higher Education, 51, 2006, 215-241.: 
Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., & Waterhouse, F. Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and student learning, Higher Education, 37, 57-70, 1999.: 
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Hounsell, J. Investigating Ways of Enhancing University TeachingLearning Environments: Measuring Students’ Approaches to Studying and Perceptions of Teaching. In De Corte, E., Verschaffel, L., Entwistle, N., & van Merriënboer, J. (Eds). Powerful Learning Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013. Environments: Unravelling Basic Components and Dimensions. (pp. 89-107). Oxford: Pergamon, 2003: 
Eriksson, A. & Carlsson, C. J. From apprenticeship genres to academic literacy: problematizing students’ and teachers’ perceptions of communication activities in an ICL environment, Journal of Academic Writing, Forthcoming (2013): 
Lea, M., & Street, B. Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23 (2), 157-172, 1998.: 
Thaiss, C., & Zawacki, T. M. Engaged Writers and Dynamic Disciplines. Research on the Academic Writing Life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers: 
Ivanič, R. Discourses of Writing and Learning to Write. Language and Education, 18(3), 220-245, 2004: 
Carter, M., Ferzli, M., & Wiebe, E. N. Writing to learn by learning to write in the disciplines. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21(3), 2007 278-302.: 
Russell, D. R. Writing in the academic disciplines: A curricular history (2nd ed.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, (2002).: 
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. Worlds Apart: Acting and Writing in Academic and Workplace Contexts. Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, 1999.: 
Dias, P., & Paré, A. Transitions: writing in academic and workplace settings. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, 2000.: 
Barrie, S. C. A conceptual framework for the teaching and learning of generic graduate attributes. Studies in Higher Education, 32(4), 2007, 439-458.: 
Paretti, M. C. Interdisciplinarity as a lens for theorizing language/content partnerships. Across the disciplines, 8(3), 2011.: 
Go to top