Using CDIO Self-Evaluation for Quality Assurance and Accreditation

Using CDIO Self-Evaluation for Quality Assurance and Accreditation

S. CHEAH, C. Koh, C. Huiting (2013).  Using CDIO Self-Evaluation for Quality Assurance and Accreditation. 10.

The Diploma in Chemical Engineering course at Singapore Polytechnic has successfully completed its 5-year CDIO implementation that began in Academic Year 2008. The details of our implementation are covered in another paper entitled “The Diploma in Chemical Engineering CDIO Experience after 5 Years of Implementation” prepared for this Conference. This present paper shares the approach taken by the DCHE Course Management Team to align its CDIO implementation and self-evaluation process to the institution’s quality management systems and holistic education framework, as well as the requirement spelt out by the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE) UK, which recent re-accredits the course for 5 years from 2012 to 2016.

We firstly outline our internal quality assurance system, known as the Academic Quality Management System (AQMS) which is based on the PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) cycle of the ISO9001:2008 system; and the People Developer Standard (PDS) for developing faculty competency. We show that the CDIO Standards can be readily mapped to the key processes and outcomes of AQMS and PDS requirements. Secondly, we evaluate our implementation effort by comparing work done against the CDIO Standards and identify areas for improvement. We also map the skill competency in CDIO Syllabus directly to the graduate attributes of SP Holistic Education, as well as IChemE’s outcome-based accreditation criteria which calls for an integrated curriculum embedded with general transferable skills (i.e. CDIO skills), topics on ESH (environmental, safety and health) as well as ethics and sustainable development.

Lastly, we conclude, through our recent re-accreditation, that our success in meeting the IChemE requirements is largely due to our systematic process of curriculum redesign using CDIO, focusing on delivering the best learning experience for students; rather than with any explicit intention of meeting accreditation criteria per se.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Sin-Moh CHEAH
C.A. Koh
Claire Ng Huiting
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Self-evaluation
accreditation
quality management and audit
continual improvement
Chemical Engineering
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Cheah, S.M., Phua, S.T. and Ng, H.T., “The Chemical Engineering CDIO Experience after 5 Years of Implementation”, paper prepared for the 9 th International CDIO Conference, June 9-13, 2013; Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.: 
Kontio, J., “Quality Assurance at Higher Education Institutes: The Role of Educational Initiatives”, International Conference on Engineering Education, July 27-31, 2008; Budapest, Hungary.: 
Hanrahan, H., “Towards Consensus Global Standards for Quality Assurance of Engineering Programmes”, in Engineering Education Quality Assurance: A Global Perspective, Patil A.S. and Gray, P.J. (Eds.), Springer, 2009.: 
Gray, P.J., “CDIO Standards and Quality Assurance: From Application to Accreditation”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23, 2011; Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Brodeur, D.R. and Crawley, E.F., “Program Evaluation Aligned with the CDIO Standards”, Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition: 
Brodeur, D.R. and Crawley, E.F., “CDIO and Quality Assurance: Using the Standards for Continuous Program Improvement”, in Engineering Education Quality Assurance – A Global Perspective, Patil A.S. and Gray, P.J. (Eds.), Springer, 2009.: 
Armstrong, P., Bankel, J., Gunnarson, S., Keesee, J. and Oosthuizen, P., “Meeting the CDIO Requirements: An International Comparison of Engineering Curricula”, World Transaction on Engineering and Technology Education, Vol.5, No.2, 2006; pp.263-266: 
IChemE, “Accreditation of Chemical Engineering Degrees: A Guide for University Departments and Assessors based on Learning Outcomes”, The Institution of Chemical Engineers, UK; February 2012: 
Karpe, R.J., Maynard, N., Tade, M.O. and Atweh, B., “Taking CDIO into a Chemical Engineering Classroom: Aligning Curriculum, Pedagogy, Assessment”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23, 2011; Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S. and Brodeur, D.R., Rethinking Engineering Education, Springer: New York, 2007: 
IChemE, “Chemical Engineering Matters: A Review of IChemE’s Technical Strategy”, publication of the Institution of Chemical Engineers, UK; May 2007: 
Adamson, L., Becerro, M., Cullen, P., González-Vega, L., Sobrino, J.J. and Ryan, N., “Quality Assurance and Learning Outcomes” European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education 2010, Helsinki: 
Go to top