Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Case Studies involving Multicultural Project-based Learning

Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Case Studies involving Multicultural Project-based Learning

R. Hugo, R. Brennan, P. Gu (2013).  Peer Assessment of Student Teamwork: Case Studies involving Multicultural Project-based Learning. 12.

This study compares peer assessment data on team performance from four different Project Based Learning (PjBL) experiences. Teams consisting of Chinese and Canadian undergraduate students, mostly from engineering programs, were studied. In all cases examined students were found to assess themselves higher than their peers. In general, the Chinese students were found to assess the Canadian students positively, while the Canadian students were found to assess the Chinese students negatively. This cultural difference was found to increase as project difficulty decreased. Outlier analysis indicated that Canadian males were most likely to give strong negative feedback, while Chinese females were the least likely to give this type of feedback. Chinese males were found most likely to give strong positive feedback, while Canadian females were the least likely to give this type of feedback.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Ronald J Hugo
Robert W Brennan
Peihua Gu
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
University of Calgary, Canada
Shantou University, China
Keywords: 
Teamwork
peer assessment
Project-Based Learning
multicultural
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Biggs, J., Tang, C., Teaching for Quality Learning at University, 3rd Edition, McGraw Hill, 2007. : 
Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., and McGourty, J. “The ABET ‘Professional Skills’ – Can They Be Taught? Can They Be Assessed?”, Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 94, No. 1, 2005, pp 41-55. : 
Savery, J.R., “Overview of Problem-based Learning: Definitions and Distinctions”, Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2006, pp 9-20. : 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach, Springer, 2007.: 
Boud, D., Cohen, R., Sampson, J., "Peer Learning and Assessment," Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 24, No. 4, 1999, pp. 413-426. : 
Conway, R., Kember, D., Sivan, A., and Wu, M., "Peer Assessment of an Individual's Contribution to a Group Project," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 18:1, 1993, 45-56.: 
Goldfinch, J., "Further Developments in Peer Assessment of Group Projects," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 19:1, 1994, 29-35. : 
Lejk, M., Wyvill, M., Farrow, S., "A Survey of Methods of Deriving Individual Grades from Group Assessments," Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 21:3, 1996, 267-280. : 
Brennan, R.W., Hugo, R.J., Gu, P., “Reinforcing Skills and Building Student Confidence through a Multicultural Project-Based Learning Experience,” Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, July 1-4 2012. : 
Peer Assessment Collaboration Rubric, Intel Teach Program – Designing Effective Projects, http://download.intel.com/education/Common/en/Resources/DEP/density/density_peer_rubric.pdf, website accessed January 2012. : 
Beatty, J.R., Haas, R.W., Sciglimpaglia, D., "Using Peer Evaluations to Assess Individual Performances in Group Class Projects," Journal of Marketing Education, 18:17, 1996, 17-27. : 
Go to top
randomness