Developing Assessment Rubrics in Project Based Courses: Four Case Studies

Developing Assessment Rubrics in Project Based Courses: Four Case Studies

P. Gray (2013).  Developing Assessment Rubrics in Project Based Courses: Four Case Studies. 14.

A common approach to assessing outcomes in project based courses is to use formal scoring guides or rubrics. However, there are major challenges in using such rubrics. These challenges are related to the variety of outcomes of project based courses and the desire to use rubrics for both formative and summative assessment. In addition, there are difficulties related to building a common understanding of the rubric criteria among both students and instructors. As part of a visiting researcher appointment at Chalmers University of Technology in Gothenburg Sweden the author worked closely with several course leaders (examiners) to create rubrics in baccalaureate and masters level project based courses. Rubrics developed as part of the American Association of Colleges and Universities (AAC&U) Valid Assessment of Learning in Undergraduate Education (VALUE) project were adapted to address the criteria related to specific course learning outcomes. These collaborations resulted in the case studies that are described in this paper.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013.

Authors (New): 
Peter J. Gray
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Project-based courses
Rubrics
pedagogy
Engineering education
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
AAC&U, Assessing Liberal Education Outcomes Using VALUE Rubrics. Peer Review, v. 13 and 14, 2011. http://www.aacu.org/peerreview/pr-fa11wi12/PRfa11wi12.pdf [Retrieved 03DEC2012].: 
Malmqvist, J., Bankel, J.,Enelund, M., Gustafsson, G., and Knutson Wedel. M. “Ten years of CDIO – Experiences from a long-term education development process,” Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010. http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/records/fulltext/local_123264.pdf [Retrieved 03DEC2012].: 
Crawley. E. F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, and Brodeur, D. R., (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach, Springer, New York, 2007. : 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wendel, M., & Enelund, M. “Constructive alignment (CA) for degree projects – Intended learning outcomes, teaching and assessment,” Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark,Copenhagen, June 20 - 23, 2011. http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/7_paper.pdf [Retrieved 03DEC2012].: 
] AAC&U, The VALUE rubrics, 2011. http://www.aacu.org/value/index.cfm [Retrieved 03DEC2012].: 
Wikström, L., Dagman, J., and Karlsson, M., “‘Like an unpolished piece of wood!’” Applying design semiaotics to the analysis of varbalizations of haptic product experiences,” Diversity and Unity, International Association of Societies of Design Research Conference, Delft, Holland, 2011.: 
Svensson, T. and Krysander, C., Project model LIPS, Studentlitteratur, Lund, Sweden, 2011.: 
Schön, D. A., The reflective practitioner- how professionals think in action, Basic Books, Inc., New York, 1983.: 
Go to top