To Design a Novel Protein -A Concieve-Design-Build-Operate Expereince in Molecular Biotechnology at Linköping University

To Design a Novel Protein -A Concieve-Design-Build-Operate Expereince in Molecular Biotechnology at Linköping University

U. Carlsson, T. Magnusson, L. Mårtensson, M. Sunnerhagen, M. Svensson, L. Tibell (2006).  To Design a Novel Protein -A Concieve-Design-Build-Operate Expereince in Molecular Biotechnology at Linköping University. 4.

To practice Bioengineering, from idea to product, requires extensive laboratory efforts, and is seldom possible to do within the frame of a single lab course. To allow for the students to develop such expertise, we have designed an extended CDIO project, which is performed over three subsequent disciplinary linked courses: Gene Technology, Biomeasurement Technologies and Protein Engineering. In this CDIO project, the students themselves create, clone, express and functionally evaluate a mutant protein of medical relevance. Half of the ~60 students performed the functional evaluation as a self-directed laboratory project in close connection to a parallel course in Project Organization, whereas the other half functionally evaluated their proteins in a teacher-directed lab course. Higher-order cognitive skills in laboratory learning as judged by a Perry evaluation were improved during the project for all students, but in particular for those who performed the self-directed evaluation. Furthermore, the students judged their own professional competence to be significantly increased as a result of their taking part in the CDIO project.

2nd International CDIO Conference, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 13 to 14 June 2006

Authors (New): 
Uno Carlsson
Thomas Magnusson
Lars-Göran Mårtensson
Maria Sunnerhagen
Magdalena Svensson
Lena Tibell
Pages: 
4
Affiliations: 
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Keywords: 
Bioengineering
CDIO
Directed self-learning
Year: 
2006
Reference: 
Berg, C. A. R., Bergendahl, C. V:, Lundberg, K. S., & Tibell, L. A. E. (2003). Benefiting from an open-ended experiment? A comparison of attitudes to, and outcomes of, an expository versus an open-inquiry version of the same experiment. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 25, 1-22. : 
Collins, J. P. (2002) May you live in interesting times. Using multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary programs to cope with change in the life sciences. Bioscience 52, 75-83. : 
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and Education. : 
Herron, M. D. (1971). The nature of Scientific Enquiry. School Review, 68(1), 17- 29. : 
Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of Science as Inquiry. In J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein: The Teaching of Science (pp 3-103). Cambridge, MA: Harward University Press. : 
Séré, M. -G., Leach, J., Niedderer, H., Paulsen, A. C., Psillos, D., Tiberghien, A., & Vicentini, M. (1998). Labwork in Science Education: Executive Summary, European Commission, Working paper 14, Project PL 95-2005 (Leeds). : 
Go to top
randomness