A Student’s Perspective on the Progression of a Problem-Based Learning Module for Final Year Aerospace Students

A Student’s Perspective on the Progression of a Problem-Based Learning Module for Final Year Aerospace Students

P. Perfect, S. Kendrick, R. Armstrong, H. Lockett (2006).  A Student’s Perspective on the Progression of a Problem-Based Learning Module for Final Year Aerospace Students. 9.

This paper describes the development and continuous improvement of Flight Handling Qualities (FHQ) from a student’s perspective. FHQ is a Problem-Based-Learning (PBL) core module for 4th year Aerospace Engineering Master of Engineering (MEng) undergraduates at the University of Liverpool (UoL). The module is now in its fourth year of operation and has continually evolved to its present form with the aid of feedback from the participating students and others experienced with PBL activities. The authors of this paper have all graduated from the UoL MEng Aerospace Engineering programme and have completed the FHQ module through each of the three previous years of the course’s evolution. Consequently, the authors can offer a unique first-hand perspective of their experiences and the progression and development of the CDIO module. In addition, one of the authors now acts as an FHQ group mentor and can offer an interesting insight into the  module’s current form. The aim of the module is to equip students with the skills and knowledge required to tackle aircraft handling qualities (HQs) and related ‘whole aircraft’ problems. The students are presented with the theory of handling qualities engineering in a series of interactive lectures and work in teams of 4 or 5 to undertake a number of team-building exercises throughout the first semester. The teams are presented with the idea that the aircraft, with its handling qualities deficiencies, is the focus for knowledge acquisition and skills development. Each team is given the task of assessing and quantifying the HQs of a particular aircraft in a particular role, and then developing fixes to any handling deficiencies identified. Significant changes in the evolution of the module include; an increase in the duration of the module and the introduction of group mentors who provide additional support and guidance to the students. The contents of the paper will consist of a detailed description of the module and intends to give a unique student perspective on the experiences gained and continuous improvement of an established CDIO module.

2nd International CDIO Conference, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 13 – 14 June 2006

Authors (New): 
P.S. Perfect
S.A. Kendrick
R.A. Armstrong
H.A. Lockett
Pages: 
9
Affiliations: 
University of Liverpool, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Flight Handling Qualities
CDIO
Problem-Based-Learning
MATLAB
Year: 
2006
Reference: 
Padfield, G.D., White, M.D., Flight Simulation in Academia; HELIFLIGHT in its first year of operation, The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Sept 2003 : 
White, M.D., Padfield, G.D., Flight Simulation in Academia; Progress with HELIFLIGHT at the University of Liverpool, Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Simulation Conference, London, May 2004 : 
Cooper, G., Harper, R., The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities, NASA TN D-5153, April 1969 : 
anon, Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft, Performance Specification, ADS-33-PRF, USAAMC, Aviation Engineering Directorate, March 2000 : 
anon, Flying Qualities of Piloted Aircraft, MIL-HDBK 1797, US Dept. of Defence Handbook, Dec 1997 : 
Hoh, R.H., Lessons Learned Concerning the Interpretation of Subjective Handling Qualities Pilot Rating Data, AIAA Paper 902824, AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference, Portland, August 1990: 
Padfield, G.D., Flight Handling Qualities, The Aeronautical Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society, Feb 2006 : 
Go to top