Integration of Different Competences in a Group Project in a Basic Course in Mechanics in Mechanical Engineering

Integration of Different Competences in a Group Project in a Basic Course in Mechanics in Mechanical Engineering

S. Olsson, B. Gross, F. Börjesson, C. Carlsson (2014).  Integration of Different Competences in a Group Project in a Basic Course in Mechanics in Mechanical Engineering. 11.

The introductory course in mechanics in the first year of the Product Design Engineering Program at Chalmers covers the topics of statics and introduction to particle dynamics. An essential part of the course is a group project and it is this project that will be presented here. Usually a project in a course in mechanics has a tendency to focus only on analytical and numerical treatment of a system that is given in advance. In this case, however, it is a completely open problem with no specific solution. The aim of the project, which can be described as a design-implement (or design- build) project, is to present a suggestion for a bridge (foot-passenger and cycling traffic) over one of the canals in Gothenburg. An important and unique feature, as distinguished from a fictive problem, is that the project in this way deals with a real problem since there are present plans for such bridges over the canals. The results of the project should be presented with sketches, presentation models, drawings and mechanical calculations on a simplified model. To support the working process a team of teachers from the areas of Applied Mechanics, Architecture, and Communication are working with the project, in order to integrate different competences. This integration supports the students in achieving the learning outcomes of the course, and this will be investigated in further detail here. Another important feature in the project is the time line for the working process, which, roughly speaking, divides the work in an internal phase (research, ideas, simple sketches etc.) and an external phase (presentation model, drawings, sketches of details etc.). This creates a creative atmosphere and also establishes a connection to the future professional role in terms of the working process and delivering results in the stipulated time. The results are presented at an official exhibition where each group gets feedback from their peers and, specifically, from the architecture, communication and applied mechanics teachers. In conclusion, the project contributes considerably in connecting learning objectives, activities and examination according to Constructive Alignment. The course evaluations also indicate that the students experience the project as positive, fun and challenging. It gives a connection between mechanics and the future professional role and it illustrates how calculations on very simplified models can be used in judging whether a construction is realistic or not. The course evaluations clearly indicate what can be summarized in the quotation “Fun to apply your knowledge on a realistic project. Now I know why we study mechanics and how to use it”.

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New): 
Sune Olsson
Björn Gross
Fia Börjesson
Carl Johan Carlsson
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Engineering mechanics
Integrated competences in group project
Mathematical modelling
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2014
Reference: 
http://www.cdio.org : 
K. Edström, K. E. Gaidi, S Hallström and J. Kuttenkeuler, “Integrated assessment of disciplinary, personal and interpersonal skills in a design-build course”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2005. : 
M. Knutson Wedel, A. Boldizar and J. Malmqvist, “Active learning through group dialogue in a project-based course on environmentally adapted product development”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, 2005: 
M. Evertsson, M. Enelund, P. Lindstedt, J. Bankel, A. Eriksson and C. Räisänen, “Designimplement experience from the 2nd year capstone course “Integrated Design and Manufacturing”, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2007.: 
B. B. Jensen, A. B. Abrahamsen, M. P. Sorensen and J. B. Hansen, “A course on Applied Superconductivity Shared by Four Departments”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011. : 
K. Gavin, “Case study of a project-based learning course in civil engineering design”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 36, No. 6, December 2011, 547-558. : 
P. Fröst and B. Gross, “Integrated model for teaching to design complex healthcare environments in architectural education”, ARCH12, http://conferences.chalmers.se/index.php/ARCH/arch12/schedConf/presentations : 
A West, Mapping, The Intelligence of Artistic Work, An Explorative Guide to Making, Thinking, and Writing, Maine College of Art, Moth Press, 2011.: 
S. Doorley and S. Witthoft, Make Space, How to Set the Stage for Creative Collaboration, Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey USA, 2012.: 
R. Grahn and P. Jansson, Mekanik – Statik och Dynamik, Third Edition, Studentlitteratur Sweden, 2013. : 
E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund and D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education, The CDIO Approach, Springer, New York USA, 2007. : 
M. Enelund, S. Larsson and J. Malmqvist, “Integration of computational mathematics education in the mechanical engineering curriculum”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.: 
M. Enelund, M. Knutson Wedel, U. Lundqvist and J. Malmqvist, “Integration of education for sustainable development in a mechanical engineering programme”, Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 2012. : 
Go to top
randomness