EURECA: A unique approach for final year project at Taylor’s University

EURECA: A unique approach for final year project at Taylor’s University

A. Al-Obaidi, D. Tien, M. Al-Atabi (2014).  EURECA: A unique approach for final year project at Taylor’s University. 12.

In an Engineering undergraduate program, the final year project covering two semesters is a compulsory requirement mandated by Engineering Accreditation bodies worldwide. The final year project tends to be research intensive compared to the design and build projects prior to the final year. It builds upon the foundational knowledge and skills attained in the earlier undergraduate years. Engineering educators and accreditors consider the learning experience obtained by the students in successfully undertaking the final year projects as essential in contributing towards their development in becoming competent and sought after entry level engineers. It also plays a part in laying the foundation for future success in an engineering career through both the hard and soft skills attained. There are many approaches in assessing a student in the final year project. However it must be borne in mind that appropriately designed assessments contribute towards effective learning and development. Therefore the final year project assessment must be aligned with the learning outcomes identified by the faculty. Here at Taylor’s University School of Engineering, in addition to the standard assessment components, a new approach is adopted to include a participation in a conference. Engineering Undergraduate Research Catalyst Conference (EURECA) is a unique approach to assess final year project students.it aims to expose the student in a real environment of a conference to gain further skills. Participation in a peer reviewed conference, assessment by external reviewers, oral defense of thesis, anonymous assessment coupled with prompt feedback to students are some of the approaches implemented to deliver the learning outcomes. This paper shares successful engineering education expereneice to further enhance the final year project component for engineering undergraduate students. This approach aims to produce engineers who are able to address the grand challenges.

Proceedings of the 10th International CDIO Conference, Barcelona, Spain, June 15-19 2014

Authors (New): 
Abdulkareem Sh. Mahdi Al-Obaidi
Douglas Tong Kum Tien
Mushtak Al-Atabi
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Taylor’s University, Malaysia
Keywords: 
Final year project
Conference
Undergraduate programme
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2014
Reference: 
Al-Atabi, M., & Al-Obaidi, A. S. M. (2011). CDIO curriculum for mechanical engineering undergraduate course. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), 6(2), 251–259. : 
Al-Atabi, M., Shamel, M. M., Chung, E. C. Y., Padmesh, T. N. P., & Al-Obaidi, A. S. M. (2013). The use of industrial visits to enhance learning at engineering courses. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), Special Issue on Engineering Education April (2013), 1-7. : 
Al-Obaidi, A. S. M., Koay, S. L., Chan, Y. M., Tam, S. W., Tan, X. Y., Goh, S. T., & Chan, S. N. (2013). CDIO curriculum for multidisciplinary engineering undergraduate course. International Engineering and Technology Education Conference (IETEC 2013), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. : 
Chandrasekaran, S., Than Oo, A. M., Stojcevski, A., & Littlefair, G. (2013). Best assessment practices of final year engineering projects in Australia. Proceedings of the IETEC’13 Conference, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. : 
Crawley, E. F. (2002). Creating CDIO syllabus: A universal template for engineering education. Proceedings of 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Boston. : 
Dahari, Z., Ngah, U. K., & Mohamad, N. (2012). Continuous quality improvement (CQI) implementation in Electrical & Electronic Engineering final year projects. 4th International Congress on Engineering Education, Penang, Malaysia. : 
EAC Manual (2012). Engineering Programme Accreditation Manual 2012. Engineering Accreditation Council, Malaysia. : 
EURECA (2013). Engineering Undergraduate Research Catalyst Conference. Taylor’s University. http://www.taylors.edu.my/EURECA/2013/ : 
Kim, H. S. (2013). Quantification for complex assessment: uncertainty estimation in final year project thesis assessment. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 671- 686. : 
Mills, J. E.; and Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education – Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, online publication: http://www.aaee.com.au/journal/ 2003/mills_treagust03.pdf : 
Ortiz-Marcos, I., Uruburu, A., Ortiz, S., & Caro, R. (2012). Final year project: Students' and instructors' perceptions as a competence-strengthening tool for engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 83-91.: 
Popov, A. A. (2003). Final undergraduate project in engineering: towards more efficient and effective tutorials. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(1), 17-26. : 
Shamel, M. M., & Al-Atabi, M. (2013). Multidisciplinary projects for second year chemical and mechanical engineering students. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (JESTEC), Special Issue on Engineering Education April (2013), 87-92.: 
Thambyah, A. (2011). On the design of learning outcomes for the undergraduate engineer’s final year project. European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(1), 35-46. : 
Ward, T. A. (2013). Common elements of capstone projects in the world's top-ranked engineering universities. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 211-218. : 
Go to top
randomness