Enhancing Quality Together with the CDIO Community

Enhancing Quality Together with the CDIO Community

J. Kontio (2016).  Enhancing Quality Together with the CDIO Community. 10.

A report of the European Commission places high expectations to the quality assurance in higher education by stating that it is at the heart of efforts to build a coherent, compatible and attractive European Higher Education Area (EHEA). In Europe the standards and guidelines for quality assurance in higher education are defined by European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (ENQA). Their guidelines divide quality assurance in three parts: 1) Internal quality assurance 2) External quality assurance and 3) Quality assurance agencies. In the CDIO initiative quality assurance and quality enhancement is supported with the Standard 12 – Program evaluation. This standard presents a system that evaluates programs against the twelve CDIO standards, and provides feedback to students, faculty, and other stakeholders for the purposes of continuous improvement. The CDIO program evaluation and ENQA internal quality assurance can be seen focusing on similar aspects of higher education. The CDIO program evaluation – self-evaluation – is done for analyzing the program’s development and for targeting the continuous improvement goals. It is a tool for a program’s quality enhancement. These program evaluations could provide fruitful information and help to other programs too. Other programs could learn from the self-evaluations and identify good practices for their development. In addition, others might also act as critical friends and provide different viewpoints and aspects to the self-evaluation and program development. Although one of the strengths of the CDIO initiative is the broad community of engineering educators, it is still rare to use this power of CDIO community in quality enhancement purposes. In this paper three such examples are discussed. First example started in 2009 with four collaborators, second in 2011 with six collaborators and the third in autumn 2014 and it continues until September 2016. All these efforts are externally funded projects. One of the idea in these efforts was to complement internal quality assurance with external quality assurance including an external assessment with a site visit and a report resulting from the external assessment. The first project focused on self-evaluation and cross-sparring within Scandinavia. It was very strongly based on CDIO standards and a one-day site visit activity was included. Four programs from four different universities participated. The second project had partners from Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Estonia and Lithuania. Four new programs from the participating universities worked on their quality enhancement during this project. The project had three main phases: workshops, self-evaluation, and cross-evaluation. The workshops were supporting pedagogical development, quality assurance and evaluation phases in partner universities. The latest project is an European-wide project and it has higher ambitions such as building a marketplace for cross-sparring purposes. This paper reflects the projects and their influence on quality enhancement. It looks back to the external quality assurance recommendations and effects on the programs. The paper also discusses the various possibilities within CDIO community to enhance quality together.

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Juha Kontio
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
Quality enhancement
program development
International Collaboration
Self-evaluation
Cross-evaluation
Cross-sparring
ENQA
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2016
Reference: 
Bennedsen, J., & Schrey-Niemenmaa, K. (2016, June 12-16). Using Self-Evaluations for Collaborative Quality Enhancement - A Case Study of Aarhus University and Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. Paper presented at the 12th International CDIO conference, Turku, Finland.: 
Clark, R., Kontio, E., Roslöf, J., Steinby, P., & Thomson, G. (2016, June 12-16). Experiences on Collaborative Quality Enhancement using Cross-sparring between two Universities. Paper presented at the 12th International CDIO conference, Turku, Finland.: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking engineering education - the CDIO approach (Second edition ed.): Springer.: 
ENQA. (2015). Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area (ESG). Retrieved from http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/home/esg/: 
European Commission. (2009). Report from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Report on progress in quality assurance in higher education. Retrieved from http://ecahe.eu/w/images/f/f6/EU_Report_on_Progress_in_Quality_Assurance_in_Higher_Edu cation_%282009%29.pdf: 
European Commission. (2014). Report on progress in quality assurance in higher education. Report to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Retrieved from http://ecahe.eu/w/images/e/ee/EU_Report_on_Progress_in_Quality_Assurance_in_Higher_Ed ucation_%282014%29.pdf: 
Kontio, J., Granholm, P., Valmu, H., Mäntykoski, J., Kruusamäe, K., Aukstuoline, M., . . . Edström, K. (2012, 30 July - 3 August). Supporting Programme Development with Self- and Crossevaluations – Results from an International Quality Assurance Project. Paper presented at the International Conference on Engineering Education, Turku, Finland.: 
Kontio, J., Heikkinen, K., Georgsson, F., Bennedssen, J., Clark, R., Matthiasdóttir, Á., . . . Karhu, M. (2015, June 8-11). QA AND ENHANCEMENT MARKETPLACE FOR HEIs – AN ERASMUS+ PROJECT. Paper presented at the 11th International CDIO conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.: 
Kontio, J., Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Thyberg Naumann, S., Munkebo Hussman, P., Karhu, M., & SchreyNiemenmaa, K. (2011). Quality Assurance with CDIO Self‐evaluation – First Results of a Nordic Project. Paper presented at the 7th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark.: 
Kontio, J., Roslöf, J., Edström, K., Thyberg Naumann, S., Munkebo Hussman, P., Karhu, M., & SchreyNiemenmaa, K. (2012). Improving Quality Assurance with CDIO Self-Evaluation: Experiences From a Nordic Project. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 2(2), 54 - 65. : 
McCartan, C., Hermon, P., Georgsson, F., Björklund, H., & Pettersson, J. (2016, June 12-16). A Preliminary Case Study for Collaborative Quality Enhancement. Paper presented at the 12th International CDIO conference, Turku, Finland.: 
Rouvrais, S., Auðunsson, H., Sæmundsdóttir, I., Landrac, G., & Lassudrie, C. (2016, June 12-16). Pairwise Collaborative Quality Enhancement: Experience of Two Engineering Programmes in Iceland and France. Paper presented at the 12th International CDIO conference, Turku, Finland.: 
Go to top