INVESTIGATION OF STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON CURRICULUM NEEDS FOR AUTONOMOUS SHIPPING

INVESTIGATION OF STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON CURRICULUM NEEDS FOR AUTONOMOUS SHIPPING

A. Tsvetkova, A. Morariu, M. Hellström, V. Bolbot, S. Virtanen (2024).  INVESTIGATION OF STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON CURRICULUM NEEDS FOR AUTONOMOUS SHIPPING.

Digitalization and automation are reshaping the maritime industry, particularly through advancements in designing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) and the expected proliferation of autonomous shipping. These innovations are altering traditional roles in ship design, operations, and the maritime sector in general. The influx of cybersecurity, automation, and IT experts into the maritime sphere is necessary for MASS integration in logistic chains. This paper examines students’ perspectives on autonomous shipping, future job markets, and educational needs related to MASS. A survey of 159 students from Finnish universities studying in the fields of IT, maritime studies, engineering, naval architecture and business and law revealed significant interest in MASS-related education, driven by its anticipated impact on their careers. The study areas of interest include automation, computer engineering, general IT knowledge, Artificial Intelligence, and cybersecurity. The findings highlight the need for interdisciplinary curricula in MASS-related education, integrating technology, safety, legal, and business aspects of MASS.

Authors (New): 
Anastasia Tsvetkova
Andrei-Raoul Morariu
Magnus Hellström
Victor Bolbot
Seppo Virtanen
Affiliations: 
Åbo Akademi University, Åbo, Finland
Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland
University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Keywords: 
Autonomous shipping
MASS
Job market
Profession
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Akbar, A., Aasen, A. K., Msakni, M. K., Fagerholt, K., Lindstad, E., & Meisel, F. (2021). An economic analysis of introducing autonomous ships in a short-sea liner shipping network. International Transactions in Operational Research, 28(4), 1740–1764.: 
Bachari-Lafteh, M., & Harati-Mokhtari, A. (2021). Operator’s skills and knowledge requirement in au- tonomous ships control centre. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Ship- ping, 5(2), 74–83.: 
Bacˇkalov, I., Vidic´, M., & Rudakovic´, S. (2023). Lessons learned from accidents on some major European inland waterways. Ocean Engineering, 273, 113918.: 
Baum-Talmor, P., & Kitada, M. (2022). Industry 4.0 in shipping: Implications to seafarers’ skills and training. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 13, 100542.: 
Bolbot, V., Lee, P., Theotokatos, G., Wennersberg, L. A., Nordahl, H., & Nesheim, D. A. (2020). Function- al/operational requirements and kpis – gaps and barriers for scaling up (Project Deliverable No. D2.5) (Available at https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds= 080166e5dd49732d&appId=PPGMS). AutoShip.: 
Bolbot, V., Methlouthi, O., Chaal, M., Valdez, O., BahooToroody, A., Tsvetkova, A., Hellström, M., Saarni, J., Virtanen, S., Owen, D., et al. (2022). Identification and analysis of educational needs for naval architects and marine engineers in relation to the foreseen context of maritime autonomous surface ships ("mass") (Project Deliverable No. D1) (Available at https://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-64-0826-2). Aalto University.: 
Chan, J., Golightly, D., Norman, R., & Pazouki, K. (2023). Perception of autonomy and the role of experience within the maritime industry. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 11(2), 258.: 
Cicek, K., Akyuz, E., & Celik, M. (2019). Future skills requirements analysis in maritime industry. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 270–274.: 
de Vos, J., Hekkenberg, R. G., & Banda, O. A. V. (2021). The impact of autonomous ships on safety at sea–a statistical analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 210, 107558.: 
Emad, G. R., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Identifying essential skills and competencies towards building a training framework for future operators of autonomous ships: A qualitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 1–19.: 
Goerlandt, F. (2020). Maritime autonomous surface ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications. Safety science, 128, 104758.: 
Goerlandt, F., & Pulsifer, K. (2022). An exploratory investigation of public perceptions towards autonomous urban ferries. Safety science, 145, 105496.: 
Jo, S., & D’agostini, E. (2020). Disrupting technologies in the shipping industry: How will mass development affect the maritime workforce in Korea. Marine Policy, 120, 104139.: 
Kim, T.-e., Sharma, A., Gausdal, A. H., & Chae, C.-j. (2019). Impact of automation technology on gender parity in maritime industry. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 18(4), 579–593.: 
Kooij, C., & Hekkenberg, R. (2021). The effect of autonomous systems on the crew size of ships–a case study. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(6), 860–876.: 
Munim, Z. H. (2019). Autonomous ships: A review, innovative applications and future maritime business models. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 20(4), 266–279.: 
Munin. (2023). Survey results – munin d9.2 released [Available at http://www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/ survey-results-munin-d9-2-released/].: 
Saha, R. (2023). Mapping competence requirements for future shore control center operators. Maritime policy & management, 50(4), 415–427.: 
Shahbakhsh, M., Emad, G. R., & Cahoon, S. (2022). Industrial revolutions and transition of the maritime industry: The case of seafarer’s role in autonomous shipping. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 38(1), 10–18.: 
Sharma, A., & Kim, T.-e. (2022). Exploring technical and non-technical competencies of navigators for autonomous shipping. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(6), 831–849.: 
Theotokatos, G., Dantas, J. L. D., Polychronidi, G., Rentifi, G., & Colella, M. M. (2023). Autonomous shipping—an analysis of the maritime stakeholder perspectives. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 22(1), 5–35.: 
Tsvetkova, A., Gustafsson, M., & Wikström, K. (2021). Digitalizing maritime transport: Digital innovation as a catalyzer of sustainable transformation. In J. Montero & M. Finger (Eds.), A modern guide to the digitalization of infrastructure (pp. 123–148). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10. 4337/9781839106057: 
Tsvetkova, A., & Hellström, M. (2022). Creating value through autonomous shipping: An ecosystem perspective. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 24(2), 255–277.: 
Tsvetkova, A., Hellström, M., & Ringbom, H. (2021). Creating value through product-service-software systems in institutionalized ecosystems–the case of autonomous ships. Industrial Marketing Management, 99, 16–27.: 
Van Hooydonk, E. (2014). The law of unmanned merchant shipping–an exploration. The Journal of International Maritime Law, 20(3), 403–423.: 
Wróbel, K., Montewka, J., & Kujala, P. (2017). Towards the assessment of potential impact of unmanned vessels on maritime transportation safety. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 165, 155–169.: 
Ziajka-Poznan´ska, E., & Montewka, J. (2021). Costs and benefits of autonomous shipping—a literature review. Applied Sciences, 11(10), 4553.: 
Go to top
randomness