DESIGN THINKING AND PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH COMPETENCY-BASED MODEL AND CRITERION-REFERENCED ASSESSMENT

DESIGN THINKING AND PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH COMPETENCY-BASED MODEL AND CRITERION-REFERENCED ASSESSMENT

S. ARGOUBI, R. Chaari, Y. Fraiji, S. Hajjem (2024).  DESIGN THINKING AND PROJECT-BASED LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION THROUGH COMPETENCY-BASED MODEL AND CRITERION-REFERENCED ASSESSMENT.

Engineering education is a challenging subject due to the particularity of skills acquisition issues in nowadays context. Students need to acquire diverse talents that are essential for career prospects beyond technical skills. Project-based learning (PBL) is a submerging pedagogical approach that applies active training by targeting the different learning outcomes needed for engineers through authentic, real-world educational scenarios. Even though it offers many advantages helping students to enhance their soft skills as well as the hard ones, it also faces some challenges such as assessment mechanisms, learners engagement and motivation, teamwork and conflict management, and harmonious integration in the curriculum. In line with our commitment to excellence in engineering education, we have integrated the PBL method, harmonized it with CDIO (Conceive, Design, Implement, and Operate) standards, and combined it with a design thinking (DT) methodology. This initiative was experimented with the second-year common core computer science engineering students at ESPRIT School of Engineering. The evaluation of students in this project is based on a detailed criterion-referenced assessment (CRA) derived from the learning outcomes of the module. This competency-based evaluation includes various metrics to measure skills acquisition based on the contribution of each student, his commitment, and collaboration with the other team members, and his creative engineering skills. In this paper, we will show how effective this DT-PBL experience was thanks to the use of CRA providing detailed insight into the performance of each learner. As a consequence, we were able to collect valuable feedback to highlight the areas of improvement. Besides, this evaluation method boosted transparency by clarifying the expectations and the evaluation criteria to the learner. Based on the experiments, we will show that this valuable and meaningful competency-based educational model ensured better individual achievement in the learning process.

Authors (New): 
Soumaya ARGOUBI
Rihab Chaari
Yosra Fraiji
Salma Hajjem
Affiliations: 
ESPRIT School of Engineering, Tunisia
Keywords: 
Project-Based Learning
design thinking
DT-PBL
criterion-referenced assessment
Engineering education
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Amini, R., Setiawan, B., Fitria, Y., & Ningsih, Y. (2019). The difference of students learning outcomes using the project-based learning and problem-based learning model in terms of selfefficacy. In Journal of physics: Conference series (Vol. 1387, p. 012082).: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1387/1/012082
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri, D. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: Are they effective to improve student’s thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346– 355.: 
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100
Barab, S. (2014). Design-based research: A methodological toolkit for engineering change. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 2, 151–170.: 
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The clearing house, 83(2), 39–43.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014). Pbl and cdio: complementary models for engineering education development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539–555.: 
https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Haatainen, O., & Aksela, M. (2021). Project-based learning in integrated science education: Active teachers’ perceptions and practices. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 9(1), 149–173.: 
https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1392
Han, S., Yalvac, B., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2015). In-service teachers’ implementation and understanding of stem project based learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 63–76.: 
https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1306a
Kingston, S. (2018). Project based learning & student achievement: What does the research tell us? pbl evidence matters, volume 1, no. 1. Buck institute for education.: 
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving schools, 19(3), 267–277.: 
https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krajcik, & Shin. (2014). and shin, n.(2014). project-based learning. The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, 275–297.: 
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018
Poonpon, K. (2017). Enhancing english skills through project-based learning. The English Teacher, 10.: 
Ralph, R. A. (2016). Post secondary project-based learning in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 6(1), 26–35.: 
https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.155
Savery, J. R. (2019). Comparative pedagogical models of problem-based learning. The Wiley Handbook of problem-based learning, 81–104.: 
Viro, E., & Joutsenlahti, J. (2020, Jun.). Learning mathematics by project work in secondary school. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 107– 132.: 
https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1372
Warr, M., & West, R. E. (2020). Bridging academic disciplines with interdisciplinary projectbased learning: Challenges and opportunities. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 14(1).: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.14434/ijpbl.v14i1.28590
Go to top
randomness