CURRENT AND FUTURE VALUE OF BEING IN CDIO – CDIO COMMUNITY IDEAS

CURRENT AND FUTURE VALUE OF BEING IN CDIO – CDIO COMMUNITY IDEAS

J. Kontio, H. Leong (2024).  CURRENT AND FUTURE VALUE OF BEING IN CDIO – CDIO COMMUNITY IDEAS.

CDIO started as a project in 2000 and in 2004 CDIO initiative was formed as a worldwide collaboration in engineering education. The collaboration is built on professional networking, shared knowledge, and practices. Its members come from all over the world and share a common goal of enhancing teaching and learning in higher education. As the community grows, it is essential that we understand the expectations of the CDIO community so that the CDIO initiative, framework, community etc. can be enabled to keep itself interesting and valuable. This paper reports on a series of engagements with CDIO collaborators at the CDIO International Conference, International Working Meetings and Regional meetings that explored the rationale of working with CDIO, how we can improve the CDIO initiative, and how to keep it valuable for our collaborators. It reflects the value of being in CDIO from the viewpoint of current and potential CDIO collaborators. There is broad consensus amongst the members that CDIO provides a valuable framework for enhancing the quality of engineering education; opportunities to share, learn and benchmark their curriculum; and network with an international community of educators with similar challenges and goals. As the landscape of higher education continues to evolve, members recognize the importance of CDIO keeping up to date with changes in the world and the needs of employers. The paper will also report the challenges faced to active participation in CDIO and to communicating the value of CDIO to colleagues, decision makers, and potential collaborators. It will discuss possible steps CDIO could take to continuously develop and to be of value to both existing and potential collaborators.

Authors (New): 
Juha Kontio
Helene Leong
Affiliations: 
Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, Finland
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
CDIO membership
Value
Expectations on CDIO
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO standard 4
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 10
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
CDIO. (2024). The CDIO initiative. Retrieved from www.cdio.org: 
Cheah, S. M., Phua, S. D., & Ng, C. (2013, June 9-13). The Chemical Engineering CDIO Experience After 5 Years of Implementation. Paper presented at the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.: 
Daft, R. L. (1978). A DualCore Model of Organizational Innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 193-210. : 
https://doi.org/10.2307/255754
Damanpour, F. (1996). Organizational Complexity and Innovation: Developing and TEsting Multiple Contingency Models. Management Science, 42(5), 693-716. : 
Edvardsson Stiwne, E., & Jungert, T. (2007). Engineering students experiences of the transition from study to work. Paper presented at the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.: 
Kamp, A. (2021, June 21-23). CDIO. Can we continue the way we are? Paper presented at the 17th International CDIO Conference [online], Bangkok, Thailand.: 
Kontio, J. (2017, 18.-22.6.2017). Why Universities want to join CDIO? Paper presented at the 13th International CDIO Conference, Calgary, Canada.: 
Malmqvist, J., Bankel, J., Enelund, M., Gustafsson, G., & Wedel, M. (2010, June 15-18). Ten Years of CDIO: Experiences from a Long-Term Education Development. Paper presented at the 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal, Canada.: 
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015, June 8-11). A Survey of CDIO Implementation Globally – Effects on Educational Quality. Paper presented at the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China.: 
Malmqvist, J., Machado, T., Meikleham, A., & Hugo, R. (2019, June 25-27). Bibilographic Data Analysis of CDIO Conference Papers from 2005-2018. Paper presented at the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, Denmark.: 
Martins, A., Costa, A., Ferreira, E., & Rocha, J. (2013, June 9-13). Assessing 6 Years of CDIO in a Computer Engineering Program. Paper presented at the 9th International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.: 
Meikleham, A., Hugo, R., & Kamp, A. (2018). Visualizing 17 years of CDIO influence via bibliometric data analysis. Paper presented at the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa, Japan.: 
O'Connor, S., Power, J., & Blom, N. (2023). A systematic review of CDIO knowledge library publications (2010 - 2020): An Overview of trends and recommendations for future research. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. : 
https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2220265
Pick, L., McCartan, C. D., Fee, K., & Hermon, P. (2021, June 21-23). Gauging the Impact of CDIO and Momentum for Further Change. Paper presented at the 17th International CDIO Conference [online], Bangkok, Thailand.: 
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.: 
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.: 
Go to top
randomness