J. Bankel, K. Berggren, M. Engström, I. Wiklund, E. Crawley, D. Soderholm, et al, et al
(2005). Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus.
13. Four internationally–renowned universities — Chalmers University of Technology, Linköping University, and the Royal Institute of Technology, of Sweden; and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US — developed a stakeholder survey that may be used by any engineering school to benchmark curricula for teaching of personal, interpersonal and system building skills. The results of the benchmark survey indicate that a consistent and deliberately designed curriculum in this area could demand no additional resources, yet provide a much more effective education for the students. The survey gives useful indications of how to begin such a redesign process. This paper was published in The International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 21 No. 1 (2005). Available here through the courtesy of IJEE .
Authors (New):
Johan Bankel
Karl-Fredrik Berggren
Madelaine Engström
Ingela Wiklund
Edward F. Crawley
Diane H. Soderholm
Khalid El Gaidi
Sören Östlund
Affiliations:
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
KTH Royal Institute of Technology,Sweden
Keywords:
Engineering education
Problem based learning
CDIO
CDIO Syllabus
Benchmarking
Reference:
L. Wilkerson and W. H.Gijselaers (eds), Bringing problem-based learning to higher education: theory and practice, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 1996, San Francisco, JosseyBass:
. D. Boud and G. I. Feletti (eds), The Challenge of ProblemBased Learning, 2nd ed., London, Kogan Page (1997).:
M. SavinBaden, Problem-Based Learning in Higher Education: Untold Stories, Open University Press (2000):
D. R. Brodeur, E. F. Crawley, I. Ingmarsson, J. Malmqvist and S. OÈ stlund, International collaboration in the reform of engineering education, Proc. 2002 ASEE Conference and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, June 2002. www.asae.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm:
T. E. Sutherland and C. C. Bonwell (eds), Using active learning in college classes: a range of options for faculty, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 67, 1996, San Francisco, JosseyBass:
S. R. Hall, I. Waitz, D. R. Brodeur, D. H. Soderholm and R. Nasr, Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class, 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conf., November 2002, Boston, Massachusetts.:
E. F. Crawley, The CDIO SyllabusÐa statement of goals for engineering education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA (2001).:
ASEE Engineering Deans Council Corporate Roundtable: Engineering Education for a Changing World, American Society for Engineering Education, Washington, DC (1994).:
E. F. Crawley, Creating the CDIO Syllabus: a universal template for engineering education, ASEE/ IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, November 2002, Boston, USA:
ABET, Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs: Effective for Evaluations During the 2000± 2001 Accreditation Cycle, Revised March 2000, Accreditation Board of Engineering and Technology. (http://www.abet.org):
The Boeing Company, Desired Attributes of an Engineer: Participation with Universities (1996). (http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices/pwu/attributes/attributes.html):
ASME, Integrating the Product Realization Process into the Undergraduate Curriculum, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1995).:
N. R. Augustine, Socioengineering (and Augustine's Second Law thereof), The Bridge, Fall 1994.:
B. M. Gordon, What is an Engineer? Invited keynote presentation, Conf. European Society for Engineering, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg, 1984:
. R. E. Kelley, How to be a star engineer, IEEE Spectrum, October 1999.:
W. J. King, The unwritten laws of engineering, Mechanical Engineering, May/June/July 1944.:
J. D., Lang et al., Industry expectations of new engineers: a survey to assist curriculum designers, J. Eng. Educ., January 1999.:
MIT, Committee on Engineering Undergraduate Education, Eight Goals of an Undergraduate Education, Massachusetts Institute of Technology School of Engineering, Cambridge, M: (1988).:
MIT, Task Force on Student Life and Learning, Task Force Report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1998). (http://web.mit.edu/committees/sll):
on October 15, 2009 - 00:30
defigio