Assessment of Professional Engineering Skills - Define, Monitor and Assess

Assessment of Professional Engineering Skills - Define, Monitor and Assess

N. Andersson, P. Andersson (2012).  Assessment of Professional Engineering Skills - Define, Monitor and Assess . 12.

The comprehensive pedagogical approach of CDIO is designed to meet the current and future requirements for engineering education. CDIO integrates the disciplinary technical knowledge and the professional engineering skills required in order to operate as an engineer in industry. Accordingly, professional engineering skills need to be included in the syllabus of engineering courses and study programs, which in turn call for the implementation of learning objectives, teaching activities as well as methods for assessing the professional performance of the engineering students. The implicit and intangible characteristics of professional skills, in comparison to the traditional disciplinary technical knowledge, require teaching activities, as well as assessment methods, that adapt to the nature and learning processes of these skills. Besides, university professors do not always have profound real life experience from industry and consequently, they might have limited knowledge about professional skills which of course delimits their ability to evaluate the students’ professional performance. The objective of this study is to design and test a method to assess professional skills in an engineering teaching context. A suggested approach, based on the three consecutive steps of Define – Monitor – Assess, was applied and tested in an engineering course in which the students and professional engineers from industry interacted in an extensive role play simulation. The students’ were actively involved in the three steps of defining the professional skills criteria, monitoring and documenting their professional performance on basis of direct feedback from the professional engineers and finally, assessing their learning process. The study concludes that the suggested approach is applicable in the assessment of professional skills with reference to a good alignment between the teaching activity of role playing and the assessment, the formative feedback from professional engineers monitoring the learning process and the realistic context provided by the location of the role play at the office premises of the respective professional engineers involved in the course.

Proceedings of the 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, July 1 - 4, 2012

 

Authors (New): 
Niclas Andersson
Pernille Hammar Andersson
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Technical University of Denmark, Denmark
Keywords: 
Active learning
Assessment
role-play
Professional skills
industry participation
Year: 
2012
Reference: 
Sheppard S.D., Macatangay K., Colby A. and Sullivan W.M., “Educating Engineers - Designing for the Future of the Field”, The Carnegie Foundation, Jossey-Bass, USA, 2009.: 
Hermon, J.P. and McCartan, C. D., “Assessing the Development if Personal and Professional Skills in Group Projects”, 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, 2010: 
Crawley E. et. al., “Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach”, Springer, 2007: 
Dewey, J., “Experience and Education”, First Touchstone Edition 1997, New York, USA, 1938: 
Kolb, D.A, “Experimental Learning”, Prentice Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 1984: 
Lave J. and Wenger E. "Situated Learning: legitimate peripheral participation" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991: 
Andersson, N. and Hammar Andersson, P., “Teaching Professional Engineering Skills – Industry Participation in Realistic Role Play Simulation”, 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, 2010a: 
Andersson, N. and Hammar Andersson, P., “Building Information Modeling in Engineering Teaching – Retaining the Context of Engineering Knowledge and Skills”, CIB W78, 27th International Conference, Cairo, Egypt, 2010b: 
Biggs J., “What the student does: Teaching for quality in higher education”, Open University Press, 1999: 
Green W., Hammer S. and Star C. “Facing up to the challenge: why is it so hard to develop graduate attributes?” Higher Education Research and Development, Volume 28, 2009, Issue. 1, pp. 17-29: 
Christensen J., Henriksen L.B., Kolmos A. “Engineering Science, Skills, and Bildung”, Aalborg Universitetsforlag, Denmark 2006: 
Bates M., “Work-integrated curricula in university programs” Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 27, 2008, Issue. 4, pp. 305 - 317: 
Illeris K, ”Læring” (in Danish) Roskilde Universitetsforlag, Denmark, 2006.: 
Wenger, E., “Community of Practise, Learning, Meaning, Identity”, Cambridge University Press, 1998: 
Andersen V., Ulriksen L., Bering I., Sørensen B., Hansen, M., “Hvordan uddanner vi kompetente ingeniører?” (In Danish) IPN nr. 6, Denmark 2006: 
Brown S. and Glasner A., “Assessment Matters in Higher Education -- Choosing and Using Diverse Approaches”, Open University Press, 2000: 
Druckman, D. and Ebner, N., ”Onstage or behind the scenes? Relative learning benefits of simulation role-play and design”, Simulation & Gaming, SAGE Publications, Vol. 39, 2008, Issue. 4, pp. 465-497: 
Cherryholmes, C. "Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: Implications for alternative strategies". American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 10, 1966, pp 4-7.: 
Clements, M.D.J., “Role-playing: a learning process to aid supply chain integration”, Journal of Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 21, 2007, Issue. 3, pp. 14-16: 
Krolikowska, K., Kronenberg, J., Maliszewska, K., Sendzimir, J., Magnuszewski, P., Dunajski, A., Slodka, A., ”Role playing simulation as a communication tool in community dialogue: Karkonosze Mountains case study”, Simulation Gaming, Vol.38, 2007, Issue.2, pp. 195-210: 
García-Barrios L.E., Speelman E.N. and Pimm M.S., “An educational simulation tool for negotiating sustainable natural resource management strategies among stakeholders with conflicting interests”, Journal of Ecological Modelling, Vol. 210, 2008, Issue. 1-2, pp. 115-126: 
Umapathy S., “Teaching Behavioral Aspects of Performance Evaluation: An Experiential Approach”, Journal of Accounting Review, Vol. 60, 1985, Issue. 1, pp. 97-108.: 
Craig R. and Amernic J., “Role playing in a conflict resolution setting: Description and some implications for accounting” Journal of Issues in Accounting Education, Vol.9, 1994, Issue.1, pp. 28- 44: 
Maier N., Solem A. and Maier A., The Role-play technique: A handbook for management and leadership practice, University Associates Inc. La Jolla, 1975: 
Pepper M.P. and Clements M.D., “Extended scenario role-playing: cumulative learning for supply chain participants”, Development and Learning in Organizations, Vol. 22, 2008, Issue. 3, pp. 21-24: 
van Ments, M., "The Effective Use of Role-Play", Kogan Page, 1989. London, England: 
Haskins M.E. and Crum R.P., “Cost Allocations: A Classroom Role-Play in Managerial Behavior and Accounting Choices”, Journal of Issues in Accounting Education, 1985, Issue. 3, pp. 109-131: 
Loui M.C., “What Can Students Learn in an Extended Role-Play Simulation on Technology and Society?”, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, Vol.29, 2009, Issue. 1, pp. 37-48: 
Dreyfus, H.L. and Dreyfus S. E., “Mind of a Machine”, Free Press, New York, 1986: 
Bloom, B.S. Hasting, T. and Madaus, G. (1971). “Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning”. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.: 
Crooks, T. “The Validity of Formative Assessments”. British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds, September 13-15, 2001: 
Shepard, L.A., “Formative assessment: Caveat emptor”. ETS Invitational Conference The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning, New York, October 10-11, 2005.: 
Huhta, A. (2010). “Diagnostic and Formative Assessment”. In Spolsky, Bernard and Hult, Francis M.. The Handbook of Educational Linguistics. Oxford, UK, 2010: Blackwell. pp. 469–482: 
Nicol, D.J., Macfarlane-Dick, D. "Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good practice". Studies in Higher Education, 2006, 31 (2): 199–218.: 
Go to top
randomness