AVAILABILITY OF CDIO AS A DRIVER OF CREATING SHARED VALUE

AVAILABILITY OF CDIO AS A DRIVER OF CREATING SHARED VALUE

Y. Fukuzawa (2020).  AVAILABILITY OF CDIO AS A DRIVER OF CREATING SHARED VALUE . Volume 1, pp.170-180.

The purpose of this paper is to examine the applicability of CDIO to business education. Particularly, I examine the effectiveness of the CDIO framework in relation to Creating Shared Value (CSV), a concept that has been attracting attention in recent years in corporate management theory. As an example, this paper introduces a Project-Based Learning (PBL) class conducted in 2018. The class emphasizes collaboration with companies and focuses on experiencing actual business. In other words, students execute a real project given by a company. The feature of this class is that it does not end at simply the planning stage, but it moves to the actual executing stage. The class is also conducted with a focused awareness of CSV. The students learn not only to conduct business but also to create social value through business activity. In other words, the significance of this class is not just to experience business, but to find shared value through business activities. Although some challenges remain, it should be considered that the CDIO process can be useful for experiencing CSV through business education.

Authors (New): 
Yasuhiro Fukuzawa
Pages: 
Volume 1, pp.170-180
Affiliations: 
Hokkaido Information University, Japan
Keywords: 
Creating shared value
Project-Based Learning
Business education
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Bienkowska, D., Norrman, C., & Frankelius, P. (2016). Adaptation of the CDIO-Framework in Management Courses for Engineering Students - a Micro-Level Approach. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, 366-374.: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, 2nd edition. Springer, Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.: 
Kanter, R. (1999) From Spare Change to Real Change: The Social Sector as Beta Site for Business Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122-132.: 
Malmqvist, J., Kwee Huay, H. L., Kontio, J., & Thi Minh, T. D. (2016). Application of CDIO in Non-Engineering Programmes -Motives, Implementation, and Experiences. Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, 84-101.: 
Malmqvist, J., Wedel, M. W., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Astrup, T. F., Vigild, M., Hussman, P. M., Grom, A., Lyng, R., Gunnarsson, S., Kwee Huay, H. L., & Kamp, A. (2019). Towards CDIO Standards 3.0. Proceedings of the 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus, 44-66.: 
Pasos, A. C., Kondo, E. K., Neto, W. B. M., & Soares C. D. M. (2018). Pedagogical Results: Joint Entrepreneurship Course in Engineering and Business School. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa, 302-314.: 
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 57-68.: 
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.: 
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62-77.: 
Tangkijviwat, U., Sunthorn, W., Meeusah, N., & Kuptasthien, N. (2018). CDIO-Based Curriculum Development for Non-Engineering Programs at Mass Communication Technology Faculty. Proceedings of the 14th International CDIO Conference, Kanazawa, 129-138.: 
Go to top
randomness