Balancing Pedagogy and Student Experience in First-Year Engineering Courses

Balancing Pedagogy and Student Experience in First-Year Engineering Courses

D. Campbell, W. Boles, M. Murray, M. Iyer, D. Hargreaves, A. Keir (2007).  Balancing Pedagogy and Student Experience in First-Year Engineering Courses. 14.

 

Engineering graduates increasingly require greater appreciation of the social and environmental context in which they practice. Engineering programs must respond to these new demands by threading these broader contexts throughout the courses and embedded them within the development of the graduate capabilities. Students are also increasingly influential in the evaluation of course quality and their experience in their undergraduate program.

Responding to these and many other global drivers and influences, we have examined a number of approaches in course design and delivery, particularly in the first year of the program, including problem based learning, project based learning, context based learning, multi-disciplinary integrated programs, and engineering systems based courses. Opportunity created by change, workplace culture, professional development, and ownership and values of academic staff all play an integral role in course design and implementation. 

 

Authors (New): 
Duncan Campbell
Wageeh Boles
Martin Murray
Mahalinga Iyer
Doug Hargreaves
Andrew Keir
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Keywords: 
Engineering education
Course experience
Learning design
CDIO
Year: 
2007
Reference: 
Boles, Wageeh and Murray, Martin and Campbell, Duncan and Iyer, Mahalinga, “Engineering the Learning Experience: Influences and Options”, Proceedings 17th Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Auckland, 2006. : 
Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future: Review Report, Institution of Engineers, Australia, 1996. : 
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, The Vision for Change, 1995. : 
Nelson, B., Our Universities - Backing Australia’s Future, Policy Paper, Commonwealth of Australia, 2003. : 
Access Economics Pty Ltd, Review of higher education outcome performance indicators, Australian Government, Department of Education, Science and Training, 2005.: 
Department of Education, Science & Training, Employability Skills for the Future, Canberra, 2002. : 
B. S. Bloom (Ed.), Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Longman Group, London, c1956-1964, pp. 201-207.: 
Built Environment and Engineering Review for Alumni and Industry, January 2007. Available at http://www.bee.qut.edu.au/about/beeline/documents/2007_January_beeline.pdf: 
Page N.W., Discussion Paper – Engineering Systems: A Proposal for Minors and Majors on this Theme coupled with Existing Majors of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, QUT internal document, 2007. : 
Hargreaves, D.H. and Evans, P., Leadership Driven by Values, Engineers Australia, Vol. 79 No. 4, 2007, pp 71- 72. : 
Go to top
randomness