The CDIO As An Enabler For Graduate Attributes Assessment In Canadian Engineering Schools

The CDIO As An Enabler For Graduate Attributes Assessment In Canadian Engineering Schools

R. Brennan, R. Hugo, W. Rosehart (2011).  The CDIO As An Enabler For Graduate Attributes Assessment In Canadian Engineering Schools. 12.

Recent changes to the criteria for engineering accreditation in Canada emphasize continuous curriculum improvement through outcomes-based assessment. In this paper, we show how the CDIO approach not only enables continuous improvement, but can assist Canadian engineering programs with the overall graduate attributes assessment process.

 

Authors (New): 
Robert W Brennan
Ronald J Hugo
William Rosehart
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
University of Calgary, Canada
Keywords: 
accreditation
Graduate Attributes
outcomes-based assessment
CDIO Syllabus
Year: 
2011
Reference: 
Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, Website, http://www.engineerscanada.ca /e/pr_accreditation.cfm, 2011: 
Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board, Accreditation Criteria and Procedures, www.engineerscanada.ca/e/files/Accreditation_Criteria_Procedures_2010.pdf, 2010: 
ABET, Self-study Questionnaire: Template for a Self-study Report, 2011-2012 Review Cycle, available at http://www.abet.org/forms.shtml, 2010: 
E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: the CDIO Approach, Springer, 2007: 
G. Cloutier, R. Hugo, and R. Sellens, “Mapping the relationship between the CDIO Syllabus and the 2008 CEAB Graduate Outcomes”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010: 
G.M. Rogers, Assessment Planning Flow Chart, CD available at http://www.abet.org/ideal.shtml, 2004: 
R. Brennan and R. Hugo, “The CDIO syllabus and outcomes-based assessment: a case study of a Canadian mechanical engineering program”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010.: 
D.J. Newman and A.R. Amir, “Innovative first year aerospace design course at MIT”, Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 375-381, July 2001: 
Bankel, J., Berggren, K-F., Engstron, M., Wiklund, I., Crawley, E.F., Soderholm, D., El Gaidi, K., Ostlund, S., “Benchmarking Engineering Curricula with the CDIO Syllabus”, International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 121-133, 2005: 
Go to top
randomness