CDIO Experience For New Faculty: Integrating Cdio Skills Into A Statistics Module

CDIO Experience For New Faculty: Integrating Cdio Skills Into A Statistics Module

P. Chua, S. CHEAH, M. Singh (2011).  CDIO Experience For New Faculty: Integrating Cdio Skills Into A Statistics Module. 12.

Over the past three years, various CDIO skills such as teamwork and communication, personal skills and attitudes (e.g. critical and creative thinking, holding multiple perspectives) have been introduced into various technical modules for the Diploma in Chemical Engineering (DCHE) in Singapore Polytechnic. Skills in conceiving, designing, implementing and operating a process, product or system using chemical engineering principles have also been integrated in the threeyear curriculum.

As part of its CDIO implementation plan, the course management team for DCHE is integrating other CDIO skills such as experimentation and knowledge discovery, and professional skills and attitudes (e.g. ethical practice) into the curriculum.

In this paper, we will be discussing the CDIO experience of a new faculty and how this is achieved through a professional development programme to support the initiative. The programme starts with enrolment of a new faculty into a Certificate in Teaching (CT) course, to be completed within one year. A key feature of the CT course is the need for a new faculty to conduct an action research project as partial fulfilment of the course.

Specifically, this paper focuses on the action research project of a new faculty to introduce suitable CDIO skills into a Year 3 module entitled Quality Management and Statistics. The main CDIO skills introduced are experimentation and knowledge discovery, whereby students are required to formulate hypotheses in verifying experimental results under a simulated real-world task scenario in a laboratory. The students need to carry out a series of experiments coupled with statistical analyses to either confirm or nullify the hypotheses. Based on the analysis of their results, the students are also expected to make relevant inferences, and provide suggestions/solutions to resolve the problem in the simulated task scenario.

This paper presents the approach taken in conducting the action research and shares preliminary students’ experience in learning the module, particularly in forming their hypotheses. The new faculty’s own reflection of his experience in re-designing the learning tasks using CDIO will also be presented.


Authors (New): 
Poh-Hui Chua
Mark Nivan Singh
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Action Research
Chemical Engineering
CDIO Skills
Professional Development
Integrated curriculum
Cheah, S.M., “Using CDIO to Revamp the Chemical Engineering Curriculum”, 5th International CDIO Conference, June 8-10, 2009; Singapore. : 
Cheah, S.M. and Sale, D., “Sustaining Curriculum Innovation: The Diploma in Chemical Engineering Experience”, 6th International CDIO Conference, June 14-18, 2010; Montreal, Canada.: 
Cheah, S.M. and Ng, H.T., “Product Design and Development for Chemical Engineering: Issues and Challenges”, 6th International CDIO Conference, June 14-18, 2010; Montreal, Canada. : 
Cheah, S.M. and Singh, M.N., “Sustaining CDIO Capability: Professional Development for Engineering Faculty”, paper prepared for the 7th International CDIO Conference, June 20-23, 2011; Copenhagen, Denmark: 
Schön D. The Reflective Practitioner. 1983; Basic Books: New York. : 
Cady, J; Distad, L; Germundsen, R., “Reflective Practice Groups in Teacher Induction: Building Professional Community via Experiential Knowledge”, Journal of Education Vol. 118, 1998: 
Haley, M; and Wesley-Nero, S., “Dialogic Construction and Reflective Practice: A Teacher Educator’s Action Research Study of Teacher as Learner”, Paper presented at TexFlec Conference, March 2002; Austin, Texas, USA. : 
Sale, D. and Cheah, S.M., “Writing Clear Customized Learning Outcomes with Key Underpinning Knowledge”, 4th International CDIO Conference, June 16-19, 2008; Ghent, Belgium.: 
Cheah, S.M., “Integrating CDIO Skills in a Core Chemical Engineering Module: A Case Study”, 5th International CDIO Conference, June 8-10, 2009; Singapore. : 
Gilles, C; Wilson, J; and Elias, M., “Sustaining Teachers' Growth and Renewal through Action Research, Induction Programs, and Collaboration”, Teacher Education Quarterly Vol. 37, 2010: 
Ginns, I; Heirdsfield, A; Atweh, B; and Watters, J., “Beginning Teachers Becoming Professionals through Action Research”, Educational Action Research Vol. 9, 2001. : 
Darling-Hammond, L. and Bransford, J., “Preparing Teachers for a Changing World: What Teachers Should Learn and be Able to Do: Jossey-Bass: San-Francisco; 2005. : 
Barr, R.B. and Tagg, J. “From Teaching to Learning - A New Paradigm for Undergraduate Education”, Change 13-25, 1995.: 
Harden, R.M. and Crosby, J. “AMEE Guide No 20: The Good Teacher is More Than a Lecturer-the Twelve Roles of the Teacher”, Medical Teacher Vol. 22, 2000: 
Gibbs, G. “Assessing Student Centred Courses”, Oxford Centre for Staff Learning and Development, Oxford: 1995. : 
Edwards, R. “Meeting Individual Learner Needs: Power, Subject, Subjection”, In C. Paechter, M. Preedy, D. Scott, and J. Soler (Eds.), Knowledge, Power and Learning, London: SAGE, 2001. : 
Go to top