A Comparison Between Different Approaches To Industrially Supported Projects

A Comparison Between Different Approaches To Industrially Supported Projects

G. Thomson, M. Prince, C. McLening, C. Evans (2012).  A Comparison Between Different Approaches To Industrially Supported Projects. 14.

Engineering and design is a vocational education with the graduates of degrees in these subjects generally being recruited into discipline specific professional roles in industry. One of the key challenges for educators is how best to develop programmes to equip their graduates for the transition from student to industrialist. One approach which can be used is via industrially supported projects. The aim of this paper is to examine the use of whole class industrially supported projects at undergraduate level. The work focuses on the examination of two quite different projects carried out by a cohort of second year mechanical engineering and product design students at a British University. The first project was based around an open healthcare related brief with an end user as the primary industrial contact while the second was a much tighter brief directed by a manufacturer of pneumatic components for the oil and gas industry. The paper discusses some of the practicalities associated with industrial projects, including intellectual property issues and scheduling. We also examine the students’ attitudes to industrial projects. These showed the students demonstrating a real appreciation for this type of work but also highlighted concerns in relation to lack of clarity in the industrial briefs and level of access to the industrial sponsors.

 

Authors (New): 
Gareth Thomson
Mark Prince
Christian McLening
Chris Evans
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
industrial collaboration projects
Design-Build Exercises
group work
intellectual property
Year: 
2012
Reference: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S.and Brodeur, D., Rethinking Engineering Education : The CDIO Approach, Springer, 2007. : 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Lucas W. and Brodeur, D., “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education.”, Proceedings of the th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen 2011 : 
Nyborg M. and Hogh S., “Mapping an industrial IT project to a 2nd semester design-build project”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal, 2010 : 
Sharukh I., “Meanwhile in the real world…”, Industrial Engineer, Vol. 43(4), 2011 pp 47-52 : 
Surgenor B., Mechefske C., Wyss U. and Pelow J., “Capstone Design – Experience with industry based projects”, Proceedings of the 1st International CDIO Conference, Ontario, 2005 : 
Berglund F., Johannesson H. and Gustafsson G., “Multidisciplinary project-based product development learning in collaboration with industry”, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007 : 
De Roza A., “Industry linkages @ NYP – Translating innovative approaches into action”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal, 2010 : 
Kon A. and Sale D., “Enhancing the CDIO learning experience through industrial partnered real world experience projects”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, Montreal, 2010 : 
Wang Y., Qi. Z. and Li Z., “Institute-industry interoperation model: an industry-orientated engineering education strategy in China”, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 12, 2011, pp 665-674: 
Rudgard A. and Trulsson K., “Industry initiated internationalization or JTH goes to China, a case study”, Proceedings of the th International CDIO Conference, Copenhagen 2011 : 
Blank L., Borrowman P., Carrasco H., Nachtmann H. and White J., Inclusion of engineering economy concepts and techniques in BS engineering curricula, The Engineering Economist, Vol 56, 2011, pp 193-204 : 
Bruneel J., D’Este P. and Salter A., “Investigating the factors that diminish the barriers to university-industry collaboration” Research Policy, Vol. 39, 2010, pp 858-868: 
Go to top
randomness