Constructive Alignment (CA) For Degree Projects – Intended Learning Outcomes, Teaching & Assessment

Home » Constructive Alignment ...

Constructive Alignment (CA) For Degree Projects – Intended Learning Outcomes, Teaching & Assessment

J. Malmqvist, M. Wedel, M. Enelund (2011).  Constructive Alignment (CA) For Degree Projects – Intended Learning Outcomes, Teaching & Assessment. 14.
2011 7th International CDIO Conference, DTU, Denmark
PDF icon 7_paper.pdf

Degree projects (DP) are currently intensively focused in Sweden: The future national model for evaluation of higher education will place a major emphasis on the quality of degree projects as an indicator of the quality of the entire education, and their quality will influence the funding of a university. Moreover, DP:s are actively used in program development as a vehicle to develop not only in-depth subject matter knowledge but also professional skills such as planning and communication. Simultaneously, Constructive alignment (CA) is being widely applied as a general approach for improving educational quality. Potentially, CA might also contribute to improving the quality of degree projects. In this paper, we examine how CA can be applied to degree projects. We conclude that CA is indeed applicable to degree projects in the sense that intended learning outcomes as well as teaching and assessment activities can be identified and aligned. But objectives, activities and assessment are less crisp than for a course, and the perspective of objectives or criteria found in the current investigation tends to be suitable for a program manager rather than an individual teacher. If CA is to provide a similar “aha” experience for a teacher as it can do when applied to a course, the intended learning outcomes need to be specialized for the particular degree project. We further identify areas where CA for degree projects can contribute to higher quality, including: supporting the planning of professional skills development in degree projects, guiding a dialogue between teacher and student on what constitutes high/low quality of a thesis, and encouraging students to take more responsibility for their learning, by forcing them to develop contextualized learning outcomes for their project.

 

Authors (New): 
Johan Malmqvist
Maria Knutson Wedel
Mikael Enelund
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
Degree project
Constructive alignment
Education quality
Integrated Learning
Year: 
2011
Reference: 
HSV, Högskoleverkets system för kvalitetsutvärdering 2011–2014, Rapport 2010:22 R, Stockholm. Sweden, 2010. In Swedish: 
Biggs, J., “Enhancing Teaching through Constructive Alignment”, Higher Education, 32: 347- 364, 1996.: 
Biggs, J., Tang, C., Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, 3rd ed, Open University Press, 2007.: 
Andersson S., Edström K., Eles P., Knutson Wedel M., Engström M., Soderholm D., Recommendations to Address Barriers in CDIO Project-based Courses, Report, www.cdio.org 2003.: 
Evertsson, M., Bankel J., Enelund, M., Eriksson, A., Lindstedt, P. and Räisänen, C., “DesignImplement Experience From the 2nd Year Capstone Course Integrated Design and Manufacturing’’, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2007.: 
Saalman, E., Peterson, L., Malmqvist, J., “Lessons Learned from Developing and Operating a Large-Scale Project Course”, Proceedings of the 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore, 2009.: 
Andersson, S., Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., Brodeur, D., “A Systematic Approach to the Design and Development of Design-Build-Test Project Courses”, Proceedings of ICED-05, Melbourne, Australia, 2005.: 
Bergman, B. Interview notes, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011.: 
Utbildningsdepartement, Högskolepolitiska propositionen: Ny värld – ny högskola, Stockholm, Sweden, 2004. In Swedish.: 
Malmqvist, J. Chalmers Alumni Survey 2010 – Selected Results, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010.: 
Malmqvist, J. Young, P. W., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Svensson, T. “Lessons Learned from Design-build-test-based Project Courses”. Proceedings of Design-2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2004.: 
Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., and Krathwohl, D. R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Handbook I—Cognitive Domain, McKay, New York, 1956.: 
Feisel, L. D., "Teaching Students to Continue Their Education", Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, 1986.: 
Edström K., Soderholm D., Knutson Wedel M., Brodeur D., “Teaching and Learning”, In Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO approach, auth. E. Crawley, Malmqvist, J., Brodeur, D., Östlund, S., pp 130-151, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007.: 
Ministry of Education, Högskoleförordningen, bilaga 2, SFS 2006:1053, pp 66-67, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006. In Swedish.: 
Hanson, M., Engström, E., Högfeldt, A.-K., Att sätta betyg på examensarbete vid KTH – Uppföljning ett år efter betygsreformen, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2009. In Swedish.: 
Nilsson, U., LUX Linköping-Umeå eXamination review. Korsvis utvärdering av examensarbeten, Lecture Notes, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2010. In Swedish.: 
Gothenburg University, Regler for betygsättning av självständigt arbete (examensarbete, examenskurs) vid Naturvetenskapliga fakulteten, Dnr A 2460/10, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2010. In Swedish.: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Riktlinjer för bedömning av kvalitet på examensarbete vid Chalmers civilingenjörs-/arkitekt- och masterprogram, Working paper, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011. In Swedish.: 
Härnqvist, K., En akademisk fråga - en ESO-rapport om ranking av C-uppsatser, Ds 1999:65, 1999. In Swedish.: 
HSV, Nytt kvalitetsutvärderingssystem 2011-2014, Proposal for review by Swedish universities, Stockholm, Sweden, 2011. In Swedish.: 
Nilsson, K.-A., Direkt kvalitetssäkring. Bedömning av utbildningens resultat och relevans, Lund University, Department of Evaluation, Report Nr 2009:255, Lund, Sweden, 2009. In Swedish.: 
on August 27, 2012 - 13:02   jenroy
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top
randomness