Educating Engineering Practice In Six Design Projects In A Row

Educating Engineering Practice In Six Design Projects In A Row

A. Kamp (2013).  Educating Engineering Practice In Six Design Projects In A Row. 19.

Tomorrow’s engineers are required to have a good balance between deep working knowledge of engineering sciences and engineering skills. In the Bachelor in Aerospace Engineering at TU Delft, students are educated to master these competences so that they are ready to engineer when they graduate. The bachelor curriculum has three mainstreams of about equal study load: Aerospace Design, Aerospace Engineering & Technology, and Basic Engineering Sciences. The Aerospace Design stream is built up semester after semester of a design project and an accompanying design course.

The main objectives of the design projects are related to contextual learning, learning by doing together, and learning and practicing academic and engineering skills, and being a mental organiser for the students. Over the years of study the design projects increase in complexity and openness, from knowing to application and synthesis, from tangible to abstract, from monoto multidisciplinary, and from mostly individual to team work. All projects exploit the factors that promote intrinsic motivation (challenge, curiosity, control, fantasy, competition, cooperation, and recognition). To assure that the intrinsic motivation factors and the semester themes are well addressed, each design project is characterised by a storyline, professional role, client, real-life problem, engineering process, and certain attainment levels of engineering skills.

The projects make use of student project spaces in a dedicated building for collaborative learning, and laboratories like wind tunnels, a structures and materials laboratory, a study collection of aircraft and spacecraft parts and subsystems, and a flight simulator.

Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013


Authors (New): 
Aldert Kamp
Delft University of Technology, Netherlands
Project education
Project-Based Learning
Experiential Learning
aerospace engineering
design education
Integrated curriculum
Intrinsic Motivation
Andernach, T., Saunders-Smits, G.N. (2006), the use of Teaching Assistants in Project-Based Learning at Aerospace Engineering. Proceedings of the 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego. : 
Brügemann, Vincent, et al. (2005), An Example of Active Learning in Aerospace Engineering. In: Erik de Graaff et al., Research and Practice of Active Learning in Engineering Education, Amsterdam. : 
Crawley, Edward, Malmqvist, Johan, (2007), “Rethinking Engineering Education”, Springer Science and Business Media. : 
Deci, Edward L., Flaste Richard, (1996), Why we do what we do, Understanding Self-Motivation, Penguin Books: 
ECED (2012), Tomorrows engineers – for an attractive Europe. 4th European Convention of Engineering Deans, University of Birmingham (panel discussion). : 
Goldberg, D. E. (2008), The Missing Basics and other Philosophical Reflections for the Transformation of Engineering Education. Excerpt from “What engineers don’t learn and why they don’t learn it: and how philosophy might be able to help”. Abstracts of the 2008 Workshop on Philosophy and Engineering, 85-86. : 
Guest, D. The hunt is on for the Renaissance Man of computing, The Independent (London), September 17, 1991 : 
Imel, Susan (2000), Contextual Learning in Adult Education. Centre on Education and Training for Employment, the Ohio State University: 
Johnson, E. B. (2001) Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. Corwin Press. : 
Kamp, Aldert, (2011), Delft Integrated Engineering Curriculum. Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference. Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark, June 20-23, 2011. : 
Kamp, Aldert, (2013), Making curricular change: Case report of a radical reconstruction process. Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013 : 
Lepper, M.R. & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames, Research on Motivation in Education: Goals and Cognitions (Vol 3). New York: Academic Press. : 
Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making Learning Fun: A Taxonomy of Intrinsic Motivations for Learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, Learning and Instruction: III. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. : 
Melkert, J.A. (2011), editor. Delft Aerospace Design Projects 2011. Het Goede Boek, Huizen (and earlier editions): 
Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (2010), Quality Assessment in the Design & Engineering Disciplines, A Systematic Framework, Amsterdam.: 
Ruth, Graham (2012), Achieving excellence in engineering education: the ingredients of successful change. The Royal Academy of Engineering: 
Saunders-Smits, G.N., (2011), Research Based Learning in a Project-Based Learning Environ-ment - A Case Study, SEFI 2011 Annual Conference, Lisbon: 
Saunders-Smits, Gillian N., et al., (2012), Using the Engineering Design Cycle to Develop Integrated Project Based Learning in Aerospace Engineering, International Conference on Innovation, Practice and Research in Engineering Education, 18-20 September 2012, Coventry.: 
Schrey-Niemenmaa, Katriina & Jones, Mervyn E. (2011), Attractiveness in Engineering Education Is all as it seems? SEFI 2011 Annual Conference, Lisbon.: 
Vockell, Edward L., Educational Psychology: A Practical Approach, Purdue University Calumet, on-line book. : 
Go to top