Educating Engineers For Research-Based Innovation – Creating The Learning Outcomes Framework

Home » Educating Engineers Fo ...

Educating Engineers For Research-Based Innovation – Creating The Learning Outcomes Framework

E. Crawley, K. Edström, T. Stanko (2013).  Educating Engineers For Research-Based Innovation – Creating The Learning Outcomes Framework. 14.
2013 9th International CDIO Conference, MIT, USA
PDF icon m3b1_crawley_008.pdf

 

Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (Skoltech) is a newly established graduate university in Moscow, Russia, with the knowledge triangle mission to educate students, advance knowledge, and foster innovation in order to address critical scientific, technological, and innovation challenges and gaps facing Russia and the world. Educational programs will therefore be designed to foster the graduate qualities that are needed for research, innovation and entrepreneurship. In order to develop a broad consensus around the educational mission of Skoltech, we engaged stakeholders to better understand their needs and the appropriate mission of Skoltech education in the triple helix ecosystem. Preliminary high-level learning outcomes were formulated, drawing on a workshop with stakeholders and on reference frameworks, among them the CDIO Syllabus. The preliminary learning outcomes were discussed in depth with stakeholders from industry, universities, research institutes and governmental organizations in Russia, EU and USA. This paper analyses the input from 38 stakeholders and presents the resulting Skoltech Learning Outcomes Framework.



Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013. 

 

Authors (New): 
Edward F. Crawley
Kristina Edström
Tanya Stanko
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology, Russia
Keywords: 
learning outcomes
stakeholder analysis
education for innovation
post-graduate education
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Maassen P. and Stensaker B., “The knowledge triangle, European higher education policy implications”, Journal of Higher Education, v. 61, 2011, 757-769.: 
Roberts, E. B. and Eesley, C. E., “Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT – An Updated Report”, Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, Vol. 7, Nos. 1-2 (2011) 1-149.: 
Etzkowitz H., and Leydesdorff L., “The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations”. Research Policy, v. 29, 2000, 109-123.: 
Times Higher Education World University Rankings, 2011 Available at: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2011-12/world-ranking/range/351- 400 [Accessed 6 December 2012].: 
Dobryakova M, and Froumin I, “Higher Engineering Education in Russia: Incentives for Real Change”. International Journal of Engineering Education, v. 26, 2010, 1032-1041.: 
Institution of Engineers, Changing the Culture: Engineering Education into the Future. Report Summary, Institution of Engineers, Australia, Canberra, 1996.: 
The Engineer of 2020: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century. The National Academies Press, Washington, D. C., 2005.: 
Royal Academy of Engineering, Educating Engineers for the 21st Century. Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2007.: 
Duderstadt J.J., Engineering for a Changing World: A Roadmap to the Future of Engineering Practice, Research and Education, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 2008.: 
Royal Academy of Engineering, Educating Engineers for the Industry. Royal Academy of Engineering, London, 2010.: 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Östlund, S., and Brodeur D.R., Rethinking engineering education: the CDIO approach. Springer, New York, 2007.: 
CDIO, The CDIO Standards, Available at: www.cdio.org: 
Biggs, J., and Tang, C., Teaching for Quality Learning at University, Buckingham: Open University Press/McGraw Hill, 2011.: 
Crawley E.F., The CDIO Syllabus: A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2001.: 
Crawley E.F., Lucas W.A., Malmqvist J., Brodeur D.R., “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0: An update statement of goals for engineering education”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20-23, 2011.: 
Delors J., et al. (1996). Learning: The Treasure Within, Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-First Century, UNESCO Publishing, Paris, France, 1996.: 
Bernard M. Gordon - MIT Engineering Leadership Program: Capabilities of Effective Engineering Leaders version 3.6, June 2011, available http://web.mit.edu/gordonelp/leadershipcapabilities.pdf : 
Feisel, L. D., “Teaching Students to Continue Their Education”. Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, University of Texas, Arlington, Texas, October 12-15, 1986.: 
Transparency International, Corruptions Perceptions Index 2012, available at www.transparency.org/cpi2012/results [accessed 5 December 2012].: 
on July 18, 2013 - 11:48   jenroy
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top
randomness