Simulation-based learning (SBL) has been widely used and accepted in the industry (think aircraft simulation for example). In education, computer simulations have been used in a wide variety of context, ranging from collaborative learning and skill needs learning to supporting differentiated learning. This study investigates the outcome of using SBL in Machining Technology, an engineering based subject at the polytechnic level by looking at two aspects: student learning and their motivation to learn. It is hypothesised that SBL, which provides learners with interactive experiences, will enhance student learning and motivation in content-heavy subjects. In the study, students in the control group received conventional instructions and workshop practice while the experimental group had conventional instructions, SBL sessions, followed by workshop practice. Both groups receive an equal amount of time on the subject. A post intervention test followed by a survey based on a framework of self-determination theory (SDT) was administered at the end of the study. Although the equal variance t-test indicates that students using SBL as an augmentation tool obtain better results, it was found that the students themselves were mostly exhibiting introjected regulatory behaviour.
Pages:
15
Affiliations:
Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore
Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords:
Simulation-based learning
machining technology
interactive digital media
Motivation
Year:
2009
Reference:
Stone, R.J., “Virtual reality for interactive training: An industrial practitioner’s viewpoint”; International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 55(4), 2001; pp.699-711. :
Aldrich, C., Learning by Doing: A Comprehensive Guide to Simulations, Computer Games, and Pedagogy in e-Learning and Other Educational Experiences. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, 2005. :
Dufour R., Dufour R., Eaker R., Many T., Learning by doing: A Handbook for professional learning communities at work, Perfect Paperback, 2006. :
Waters H., Amsden A., Frank G., Voor D. & England S. “Use of tactical software In maintenance trainers”. Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference, November 2002. :
Tan H.S., “Learning & motivational aspects of using interactive digital media (IDM)”. In P. Towndrow., C. Koh & H.S. Tan (Eds.), Motivation and Practice for the Classroom. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, 2008, pp. 315-340.:
Davidovitch, L, Shtub A., & Parush A., “Project management simulation-based learning for systems engineering students”, International Conference on Systems Engineering and Modelling (ICSEM), 2007, pp. 17-23. :
Balamuralithara B. & Woods P.C., “Virtual laboratories in engineering education: The simulation lab and remote lab”, Computer Applications in Engineering Education, Vol. 17 (3), 2009, pp. 108-118.:
Luetner D., “The fuzzy relationship of intelligence and problem solving in computer simulations”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 18 (6), 2002, pp. 685-697. :
Fraser D.M., Pillay R., Tjatindi L. & Case J.M., “Enhancing the learning of fluid mechanics using computer simulations”. Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 96 (4), 2007, pp. 381-388:
Fang L., Tan H.S., Tan K.C., Lye S.L., Fong F.M., Kan D., Wee M.L., Koh C., Kwok K.T. & Twin M.M., “The effectivenss of 3D simulation-based learning for engineering students at Temasek Polytechnic Polytechnic, Singapore”, Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Advances in Technology Education (ISATE 2008), Japan. Retrieved 24 Dec 2008, http://isate2008.cs.knct.ac.jp/:
Koh C., Tan H.S., Tan K.C., Fang L., Fong F.M., Kan D., Kwok K.T., Lye S.L., Ng C.S. & Wee M.L., “Exploring the use of 3D Simulation-based learning to enhance the motivation of engineering students”. Proceedings of Asia Pacific Educational Research Association Conference (APERA 2008). Retrieved 23 Dec 2008, http://www.apera08.nie.edu.sg/proceedings/8.26.pdf :
Bodemer D., “Enhancing simulation-based learning through active external integration of representations”. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society Mahwah, Lawrence Erlbaum, NJ, 2005, pp. 138-143. :
Leutner D., “Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support”. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 3, 1993, pp. 113-132.:
Lowe R.K., “Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning”. European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 14 (2), 1999, pp. 225-244. :
Pintrinch P.R. & De Groot E.V., “Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 82 (1), 1990, pp. 33-40. :
Schwartzer R. & Jerusalem M., “Generalized self-efficacy scale”. In J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. NFER-Nelson, Windsor, UK: 1995, pp. 35-37. :
Williams G.C. & Deci E.L., “Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 70, 1996, pp. 767-779. :
McAuley E., Duncan T.E. & Tammen V.V., “Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis”, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, Vol. 60, 1989, pp. 48-58.:
Ryan R.M. & Connel J.P., “Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 57, 1989, pp. 749-761. :
Harter S., “A new self-report scale of intrinsic versus extrinsic orientation in the classroom: Motivational and informational components”, Developmental Psychology, Vol. 17, 1981, pp. 300-312. :
Lepper M.R., Corpus J.H. & Iyengar S.S., “Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates”, Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 97(2), 2005, pp. 184-196.:
Ryan R.M. & Deci E.L., “Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being”, American Psychologist, Vol. 55, 2000, pp. 68-78. :
Ryan R.M. & Deci E.L., “Intrinsic & extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 25, 2000, pp. 54-67. :
Deci E.L. & Ryan R.M., Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behaviour, NY: Plenum, 1985. :
Pavio A., “Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status”, Canadian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 45, 1991, pp. 255-287. :
Sternberg R.J. & Davidson J.E., “Insight in the gifted”, Educational Psychologist, Vol. 18, 1983, pp. 52-58.:
Rieber L.P., Computers, Graphics and Learning. Duuque, Iowa: WCB Brown & Benchmark, 1994. :
Bryne C.M., “Virtual reality and education”, Proceedings of IFIP WG3.5 International Workshop Conference, 1993, pp. 181-189.:
Lewis J.E., “Virtual reality: Ready or not”, Technos, Vol. 3(1), 1994, pp. 10-15.:
Osberg K.M., “Virtual reality and education: Where imagination and experiences meet”. VR in the Schools, Vol. 1(2), 1995, pp. 1-3.:
on December 9, 2018 - 12:37 Tyrone Machado
Conceive
Design
Implement
Operate
