Engaging In A Multiple-Track Approach To Building Capacity For 21st Century Engineering, Opportunities And Challenges For Rapid Curriculum Renewal

Engaging In A Multiple-Track Approach To Building Capacity For 21st Century Engineering, Opportunities And Challenges For Rapid Curriculum Renewal

C. Desha, K. Hargroves (2012).  Engaging In A Multiple-Track Approach To Building Capacity For 21st Century Engineering, Opportunities And Challenges For Rapid Curriculum Renewal. 13.

‘Complexity’ is a term that is increasingly prevalent in conversations about building capacity for 21st Century professional engineers. Society is grappling with the urgent and challenging reality of accommodating seven billion people, meeting needs and innovating lifestyle improvements in ways that do not destroy atmospheric, biological and oceanic systems critical to life.

Over the last two decades in particular, engineering educators have been active in attempting to build capacity amongst professionals to deliver ‘sustainable development’ in this rapidly changing global context. However curriculum literature clearly points to a lack of significant progress, with efforts best described as ad hoc and highly varied. Given the limited timeframes for action to curb environmental degradation proposed by scientists and intergovernmental agencies, the authors of this paper propose it is imperative that curriculum renewal towards education for sustainable development proceeds rapidly, systemically, and in a transformational manner.

Within this context, the paper discusses the need to consider a multiple track approach to building capacity for 21st Century engineering, including priorities and timeframes for undergraduate and postgraduate curriculum renewal. The paper begins with a contextual discussion of the term complexity and how it relates to life in the 21st Century. The authors then present a whole of system approach for planning and implementing rapid curriculum renewal that addresses the critical roles of several generations of engineering professionals over the next three decades. The paper concludes with observations regarding engaging with this approach in the context of emerging accreditation requirements and existing curriculum renewal frameworks.


Authors (New): 
Cheryl Desha
Karlson Hargroves
Queensland University of Technology, Australia
University of Adelaide, Australia
Dual track approach
Curriculum Design
model for deliberative and dynamic curriculum renewal
Systemic and intentional curriculum renewal
engineering education for sustainable development
The Natural Edge Project, www.naturaledgeproject.net, accessed 21 April 2012.: 
Stern, N. (2006) The Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.: 
Gore, A. (2006) An Inconvenient Truth, P. C. a. P. Productions.: 
Diamond, J. (2005) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed, Penguin Books, New York.: 
Talberth, J., Cobb, C. and Slattery, N. (2006) The Genuine Progress Indicator 2006: A Tool for Sustainable Development, Redefining Progress, Oakland, California: 
Smith, M., Hargroves, C. and Desha, C. (2010) ‘Figure 2.7 Gross Domestic Product vs. Estimated Environmental Costs (billions) for the United States of America from 1950-2004’, in Cents and Sustainability - Securing Our Common Future by Decoupling Economic Growth from Environmental Pressures, Earthscan, London: 
Department for Communities and Local Government (2006) ‘Code for Sustainable Homes: A step-change in sustainable home building practice’, Crown Copyright Rajgor, G. (2007) ‘Countdown to zero emissions’, Refocus, vol 8, no 1, pp60-61.: 
CBD (2006) Global Biodiversity Outlook 2, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Montreal: 
Chong, S.K. (2005) ‘Anmyeon-do Recreation Forest: A Millennium of Management’, in Durst, P. et al (eds), In Search of Excellence: Exemplary Forest Management in Asia and the Pacific, AsiaPacific Forestry Commission, FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp251-259: 
UNECE (1979-2005) The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air pollution, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva: 
Hutton, G. and Haller, L. (2004) Evaluation of the Costs and Benefits of Water and Sanitation Improvements at the Global Level, Water, Sanitation and Health, Protection of the Human Environment, World Health Organization, Geneva: 
Lovins, A. (undated) ‘Amory Lovin’s Natural Capitalism Lecture’, ABC: The Slab, Australia: 
Global Sources (2005) RoHS compliance readiness survey: mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and South Korea, Global Sources, p3: 
Holland, M., Kinghorn, S., Emberson, L., Cinderby, S., Ashmore, M., Mills, G. and Harmens, H. (2006) Development of a framework for probabilistic assessment of the economic losses caused by ozone damage to crops in Europe, CEH project No. C02309NEW, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Natural Environment Research Council, Bangor, Wales.: 
UNECE (1994) The 1994 Oslo Protocol on Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva: 
Desha, C., Hargroves, K. and Smith, M. (2009) ‘Addressing the time lag dilemma in curriculum renewal towards engineering education for sustainable development’, International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, vol 10, no 2, pp184-199.: 
Rensburg, E., Lotz Sisitka, H. and Mosidi, S. (2001) Environmental Learning Across NQF, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, South Africa: 
Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment (2004) See Change: Learning and education for sustainability, Wellington, New Zealand: 
Sustainable Development Education Panel (2002) Learning to Last: Business and Sustainable Development - a Learning Guide for Sector Skills Councils.: 
Byrne, E., Desha, C., Fitzpatrick, J. & Hargroves, K. (2010). Engineering Education For Sustainable Development: A Review Of International Progress, in proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium for Engineering Education, 2010, University College Cork, Ireland.: 
Desha, C. & Hargroves, K. (2011) ‘Informing engineering education for sustainable development using a deliberative dynamic model for curriculum renewal’, in proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium, 2011, Madrid.: 
Desha, C. and Hargroves, K. (2012) ‘Fostering rapid transitions to Education for Sustainable Development through a whole system approach to curriculum and organizational change’, in proceedings of the 2012 World Symposium on Sustainable Development at Universities, Rio de Janeiro, 5-7 June 2012: 
von Weizsäcker, E., Hargroves, K., Smith, M., Desha, C. and Stasinopoulos, P. (2009) Factor 5: Transforming the Global Economy through 80% Increase in Resource Productivity, Earthscan, UK and Droemer, Germany: 
CBD (2006) Global Biodiversity Outlook 2, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), Montreal.: 
Briscoe, J. (2008) India’s Water Economy: Bracing for a Turbulent Future, World Bank, Washington DC.: 
OECD (2008) OECD Environmental Outlook to 2030, OECD, Paris, pp246, 249: 
CSE (1999) ‘Sick of Air Pollution’, Press Release, Centre for Science and Environment, 5 June 1999: 
United Nations Environment Programme (2008) Green Jobs: Towards Decent Work in a Sustainable, Low-Carbon World, United Nations: 
Forum for the Future (2004) ‘Tip for Top in Higher Education: Forum’s Learning in Action conference pushes the SD solutions’, www.forumforthefuture.org.uk/greenfutures/articles/601773, accessed 21 January 2011.: 
The US Partnership for Education for Sustainable Development (n.d.) ‘The US Partnership for Education for Sustainable Development’, http://usp.umfglobal.org/main/view_archive/1, accessed 21 April 2012: 
DANS (n.d.) ‘Mission and Action Plan for the Disciplinary Associations Networks for Sustainability’, www.aashe.org/dans/about.php, accessed 21 April 2012.: 
Go to top