ENGAGING STUDENTS ORIENTED TOWARDS USEFULNESS IN A BILDUNG-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATION

ENGAGING STUDENTS ORIENTED TOWARDS USEFULNESS IN A BILDUNG-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATION

R. Kjelsberg, M. Kahrs (2023).  ENGAGING STUDENTS ORIENTED TOWARDS USEFULNESS IN A BILDUNG-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATION . 966-974.

In the context of engineering education, there has been a turn toward seeing the future engineer as an agent in society, resolving perceivingly more complex problems, often in cooperation with representatives from other professions. Simultaneously, this more system-perspective and citizen-oriented turn in engineering education connects the education closer to the idea of Bildung, where students are expected not only to become practitioners of a craft, but also active participants in society. This paper discusses the contentious relationship between the concepts of Bildung and usefulness, where a theoretical discussion contrasting different traditions and forms of Bildung is illuminated by datasets from 1700 1st year bachelor engineering students across four consecutive years and these students’ motivations toward Bildung-oriented topics. The students’ profession-oriented motivations and orientation toward usefulness suggest that a Bildung-oriented education based on the idea that there is a conflict between usefulness and Bildung will be unsuccessful in motivating these students to engage themselves in society. An education for engineering Bildung should thus be based on integrating the ideas of usefulness into the concept of Bildung.

Authors (New): 
Ronny Kjelsberg
Magnus Strøm Kahrs
Pages: 
966-974
Affiliations: 
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Keywords: 
Bildung
Systems perspective
usefulness
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO standard 4
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Adler, M. J. (1952). The Great Ideas: A Syntopicon of Great Books of the Western World (Vol. 1). Chicago, London, Toronto: Encyclopedia Britannica.: 
Axelsson, A.-S. (2009). Bildning i den tekniska högskolan [Bildung at the engineering college]. In Å. I. K. Wagner & A.-S. Axelsson (Eds.), På spaning efter teknisk bildning [Searching for technical Bildung] (pp. 222-241). Stockholm: Liber.: 
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa: 
Burman, A. (2011). Svar på frågan: Vad är medborgerlig bildning? [Answer on the question: What is civic Bildung?]. In A. Burman (Ed.), Våga veta! Om bildningens möjligheter i massutbildningens tidevarv [Dare to know! About the opportunities for Bildung in a time of mass education] (pp. 9-31). Huddinge: Södertörns högskola.: 
Elmose, S., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 11-34. doi:10.1080/0022027041000229413: 
Graham, R. (2018). The global state of the art in engineering education. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.: 
Grasso, D., Burkins, M. B., Helble, J. J., & Martinelli, D. (2010). Dispelling the Myths of Holistic Engineering. In D. Grasso & M. B. Burkins (Eds.), Holistic Engineering Education. New York Springer New York : 
Gustavsson, B. (2012). Bildningens traditioner i transformation [The traditions of Bildung in transformation]. In A. Burman & P. Sundgren (Eds.), Svenska bildningstraditioner [Swedish Bildung traditions] (pp. 309-327). Göteborg: Daidalos.: 
Gustavsson, B. (2014). Bildung and the road from a classical into a global and postcolonial concept. Confero, 2, 109-131. : 
Hellesnes, J. (1992). Ein utdana mann og eit dana menneske. In E. L. Dale (Ed.), Pedagogisk filosofi (pp. 79-104). Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.: 
Kamp, A., & Klaassen, R. G. (2016). Impact of global forces and empowering situations on engineering education in 2030. Paper presented at the 12th international CDIO conference.: 
Klafki, W. (2001). Kategorial dannelse : Bidrag til en dannelsesteoretisk fortolkning av moderne didaktikk. In E. L. Dahle (Ed.), Om utdanning : Klassiske tekster. Oslo: Gyldendal Norsk Forlag.: 
Klafki, W. (2016). Dannelsesteori og didaktik - nye studier. Aarhus: Forlaget Klim.: 
Liedman, S.-E. (2001). Ett oändligt äventyr – Om människans kunskaper. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag.: 
Roos, M. (2017). Naturvitenskap som dannelsesprosjekt. In M. R. J. Tønnesson (Ed.), Sann opplysning? Naturvitenskap i nordiske offentligheter gjennom fire århundrer. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.: 
Schwanitz, D. (1999). Bildung : Alles was man wissen muß. Frankfurt an Main: Eichborn Verlag.: 
Sjöström, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering Different Visions of Scientific Literacy and Science Education Based on the Concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, Metacognition, and Culture in STEM Education: Learning, Teaching and Assessment (pp. 65-88). Cham: Springer International Publishing.: 
Sjöström, J., Eilks, I., & Talanquer, V. (2020). Didaktik Models in Chemistry Education. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(4), 910-915. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01034: 
Sjöström, J., Frerichs, N., Zuin, V. G., & Eilks, I. (2017). Use of the concept of Bildung in the international science education literature, its potential, and implications for teaching and learning. Studies in Science Education, 53(2), 165-192. doi:10.1080/03057267.2017.1384649: 
UHR. (2020). Nasjonale retningslinjer for ingeniørutdanning [National guidelines for engineering education]. Oslo: Universitets- og høgskolerådet Retrieved from https://www.uhr.no/_f/p1/i3f80bc0d-b1b6-4334-bf25-7571488e9612/nasjonale-retningslinjer-for-ingeniorutdanning-vilkar-for-siving-vedtatt-nov-2022.pdf: 
Go to top
randomness