"Engineering Design" Course Transformation: From a Conceive-Design towards a Complete CDIO Approach

"Engineering Design" Course Transformation: From a Conceive-Design towards a Complete CDIO Approach

J. Munoz-Guijosa, A. Lantada, E. Tanarro, J. Otero, J. Sanz, J. Garcia (2016).  "Engineering Design" Course Transformation: From a Conceive-Design towards a Complete CDIO Approach. 14.

“Engineering Design” is a discipline aimed at improving our understanding about the development processes of novel and successful products, processes and systems in general, and at providing engineers with methodical steps for enhancing such processes. It may well be the engineering discipline more linked to the CDIO approach and to the conceive-design-implement-operate process. The benefits of applying “Engineering Design” principles are better appreciated when facing the development of complex systems. In the field of Mechanical Engineering some of the more complex systems an engineer can develop are advanced mechanical systems and machines.

In this study we present the transformation process of an “Engineering Design” course, carried out in parallel to the implementation of the new Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering at ETSII – TU Madrid. In the old Industrial Engineering plan of studies, implemented in 2000, the “Engineering Design” course was taught in the 5th academic year for Industrial Engineering students specializing in Mechanical Engineering and lasted for one semester. In the new Master’s Degree in Industrial Engineering, which started in 2014-2015, the “Engineering Design” course can be chosen by students from all Industrial Engineering specializations. The new subject lasts for two semesters and it is taught, in the 1st academic year of the Master’s Degree, to students having finished a four-year Bachelor’s Degree in Industrial Technologies. When transforming the course, our first aim was to let students live through a complete CDIO process, as having a two-semester structure gave us additional time for reaching the implementation and operation stages. With the old one-semester structure they could just focus on the conceptual and design phases. With the new approach their experience is more complete but several challenges arise, which are systematically analyzed in the following pages. A comparative study, taking account of the opinions of students and teachers is also presented and helps to support the benefits from complete CDIO experiences. Key aspects, including: student motivation, coordination between teachers, supervision of the projects under a tight schedule, rapid prototyping resources for reaching the implementation and operation stages, among others, are discussed and the more relevant lessons learned and proposals for improvement are put forward.

To our knowledge it constitutes the first subject following a complete CDIO cycle in the field of Engineering Design applied to machines engineering in our country.

Proceedings of the 12th International CDIO Conference, Turku, Finland, June 12-16 2016

Authors (New): 
Juan Manuel Munoz-Guijosa
Andrés Díaz Lantada
Enrique Chacón Tanarro
Javier Echávarri Otero
José Luis Muñoz Sanz
Julio Muñoz Garcia
Pages: 
14
Affiliations: 
Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), Spain
Keywords: 
CDIO as Context
Integrated curriculum
integrated learning experiences
Active learning
Engineering Design
Mechanical Systems
Machines Engineering
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
Year: 
2016
Reference: 
Chacón Tanarro, E., Munoz-Guijosa, J. M., Díaz Lantada, A. Leal Wiña, P., Echávarri Otero, J., Muñoz Sanz, J. L., Muñoz García, J. ,Nava Rodríguez, O., Garre Mondéjar S., Teaching Engineering Design to a Multidisciplinary Audience at Master’s level: Benefits and Challenges of the CDIO Approach, Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of Information Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China, June 8-11, 2015.: 
Crawley, E.F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D.R. (2007) Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. Springer, 1-286.: 
Díaz Lantada, A., Lafont Morgado, P., Muñoz-Guijosa, J.M., Muñoz Sanz, J.L., Echávarri Otero, J., Muñoz García, J., Chacón Tanarro, E., De la Guerra Ochoa, E. (2013) Towards successful projectbased learning experiences in Engineering Education. Int. Journal of Eng. Education, 29(2), 476- 490.: 
Hernandez Bayo, A., Ortiz Marcos, I., Carretero Díaz, A., De la Fuente, M.M., Lumbreras Martín, J., Martínez Muneta, M.L., Riveira Rico, V., Rodríguez Hernández, M. (2014) Integral framework to drive engineering education beyond technical skills. International Journal of Engineering Education, 30(6B), 1697-1707.: 
Muñoz Guijosa, J.M., Díaz Lantada, A., Rodríguez de la Cruz, V., Chacón Tanarro, E., De la Guerra Ochoa, E., Lafont Morgado P., Muñoz Sanz, J.L. (2011) Preparing mechanical engineering students for product design professional practice through PBL: planning and execution of the subject. ASME 8th International Conference on Design and Design Education.: 
Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., Mc Gourty, J. (2005) The ABET professional skills, can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education, 94, 41-55.: 
Go to top
randomness