ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS' SELF-REGULATION: A BASELINE

ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS' SELF-REGULATION: A BASELINE

S. Tuyaerts, T. De Laet, L. Van den Broeck, G. Langie (2023).  ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY STUDENTS' SELF-REGULATION: A BASELINE. 891-901.

Technology is evolving at a very rapid rate in today's society. Even though engineering students get acquainted with state-of-the-art technological advancements, these often get outdated dur- ing the engineers' careers. It is therefore of major importance that engineers learn to learn for a lifetime, in order to train their personal competencies and to keep up with technological innovations. Currently, there is no framework that defines the umbrella competency lifelong learning (LLL). It is certain, however, that self-regulation is a core and malleable competency for LLL. This research presents Flemish engineering students' self-regulation levels, measured using the Self-Reflection and Insight Scale (SRIS). The SRIS consists of three subscales: en- gagement in self-reflection, need for self-reflection, and insight. The scores are looked at from different angles, such as across study phases and by taking into account background variables like secondary education (SE) type and sex. In general, master students report the highest level of self-regulation. Most notably, students with a more technical SE-background report higher levels of self-regulation in the master year than in the bachelor years, whereas students with a more general SE-background do not. Male and female students' self-regulation is at roughly the same level, but influenced by the underlying subscales.

Authors (New): 
Shan Tuyaerts
Tinne De Laet
Lynn Van den Broeck
Greet Langie
Pages: 
891-901
Affiliations: 
KU Leuven, Belgium
Keywords: 
Engineering education
lifelong learning
Self-regulation
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Bayrakgi, M., & Dindar, H. (2015). Factors effecting students' lifelong learning in higher educa- tion. International Journal on Lifelong Education and Leadership, 1(1), 11-20.: 
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.: 
Crandall, J. E. (1973). Sex differences in extreme response style: Differences in frequency of use of extreme positive and negative ratings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 89(2), 281- 293.: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D., & Edstrom, K. (2007). Rethinking engi- neering education. The CDIO approach, 302(2), 60-62.: 
Cruz, M. L., Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Groen, P. (2020). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(5), 729-757.: 
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality: an international jour- nal, 30(8), 821-835.: 
Guest, G. (2006). Lifelong learning for engineers: a global perspective. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(3), 273-281.: 
Hirudayaraj, M., Baker, R., Baker, F., & Eastman, M. (2021). Soft skills for entry-level engineers: What employers want. Education Sciences, 11(10), 641.: 
Kirby, J. R., Knapper, C., Lamon, P., & Egnatoff, W. J. (2010). Development of a scale to measure lifelong learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 29(3), 291-302.: 
Lord, S. M., Prince, M. J., Stefanou, C. R., Stolk, J. D., & Chen, J. C. (2012). The effect of differ- ent active learning environments on student outcomes related to lifelong learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(3), 606.: 
Luftenegger, M., Schober, B., Van de Schoot, R., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2012). Lifelong learning as a goal-do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils? Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 27-36.: 
Naeimi, L., Abbaszadeh, M., Mirzazadeh, A., Sima, A. R., Nedjat, S., & Hejri, S. M. (2019). Vali- dating self-reflection and insight scale to measure readiness for self-regulated learning. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8.: 
Onderwijsdoelen.be. (n.d.). Secundair onderwijs - 3de graad - voor modernisering. (Online; accessed 23-01-2023): 
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of personality and social psychology, 46(3), 598.: 
Qalehsari, M. Q., Khaghanizadeh, M., & Ebadi, A. (2017). Lifelong learning strategies in nursing: A systematic review. Electronic physician, 9(10), 5541.: 
Roberts, C., & Stark, P. (2008). Readiness for self-directed change in professional behaviours: factorial validation of the self-reflection and insight scale. Medical education, 42(11), 1054- 1063.: 
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). New effect size rules of thumb. Journal of modern applied statistical methods, 8(2), 26.: 
Van den Broeck, L., & Langie, G. (2022). Self-regulation as a core competency for lifelong learning - survey validation for engineering students. Presented at the SIG 16 - Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning, online.: 
Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 311-328). Routledge. : 
Go to top