EVALUATING ASSESSMENT IN AN ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE

EVALUATING ASSESSMENT IN AN ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE

C. McCartan (2008).  EVALUATING ASSESSMENT IN AN ENGINEERING MATHEMATICS MODULE.

Teaching tertiary mathematics to engineers is a worldwide issue. This paper discusses an evaluation of assessment methods with the goal of improving student learning in an engineering mathematics module. It tests the hypothesis that there can be a substantial impact on student learning by encouraging sufficient, relevant and productive out-of-class active learning activities.

A detailed description of these assessment processes is presented along with data to appraise their effectiveness with regard to enhancing student learning. This is discussed and it is shown that continuous active learning can successfully improve learning. 

Authors (New): 
Charles McCartan
Affiliations: 
Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Engineering Mathematics
declining mathematical skills
Active learning
Motivation
content
teaching
learning
Assessment
Year: 
2008
Reference: 
Crawley E.F., Malmqvist J., Östlund S., Brodeur D.R., Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach. Springer.: 
ISBN 978-0-387-38287-6, 2007
McCartan C.D. and Hermon J.P., “Systematic Development of a First Year Engineering Mathematics Module”, Proceedings of the 4th International CDIO Conference, Hogeschool Gent, Belgium, June 16- 19, 2008: 
Penner J.G., Why Many College Teachers Cannot Lecture. Springfield, Ill.: Charles C. Thomas 1984. : 
Ruhl K.L., Hughes C.A., and Schloss P.J., “Using the Pause Procedure to Enhance Lecture Recall”, Teacher Education and Special Education 10: 14-18, 1987. : 
Rust C., “The Impact of Assessment on Student Learning: How Can the Research Literature Practically Help to Inform the Development of Departmental Assessment Strategies and Learner-Centred Assessment Practices?”, Active Learning in Higher Education 2002; 3; 145, The Institute for Learning and Teaching in Higher Education and SAGE Publications : 
Gibbs G. and Simpson C., “Does your assessment support your students' learning?”, Journal of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1, 1, 2003. : 
Forbes D. and Spence J., “An Experiment in Assessment for a Large Class”, in R. Smith (ed.), 1991, Innovations in Engineering Education. London: Ellis Horwood. : 
Willcox K. and Bounova G., “Mathematics in Engineering: Identifying, Enhancing and Linking the Implicit Mathematics Curriculum”, Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Copyright 2004, American Society for Engineering Education. : 
Varsavsky, C., “The Design of the Mathematics Curriculum for Engineers: A joint Venture of the Mathematics Department and the Engineering Faculty”, European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 20, Issue 3, 1995, pages 341-345. : 
Chickering A.W. and Gamson Z.F., “Seven Principles for Good Practice”, AAHE Bulletin 39: 3-7. ED 282 491. 6 pp. MF-01; PC-01, 1987.: 
Bligh D., What's the use of lectures? (2nd Ed.). Oxford 1997: Intellect. : 
Joughin G., “Learning-oriented assessment: a conceptual framework”, Effective Learning and Teaching Conference, Brisbane, 4–5 November, Conference proceedings G. Crebert, L. Davies & S. Phillips (Eds). : 
Rust C., Price M. and O’Donovan B., “Improving Students’ Learning by Developing Their Understanding of Assessment Criteria and Processes”, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2003. : 
Go to top
randomness