EXPLORING STUDENT MOTIVATION IN A BLENDED AND SELF-DIRECTED GROUP-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

EXPLORING STUDENT MOTIVATION IN A BLENDED AND SELF-DIRECTED GROUP-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

F. TIO (2020).  EXPLORING STUDENT MOTIVATION IN A BLENDED AND SELF-DIRECTED GROUP-LEARNING ENVIRONMENT. Volume 2, pp.23-33.

This paper presents a study that was conducted to explore the effectiveness of conducting self-directed learning (SDL) in a blended and self-directed group learning environment to motivate learners to learn by themselves. Many of our learners tend to be extrinsically motivated by the attainment of course credits, and that often results in poor participation and completion rate for topics delivered through SDL. With the implementation of SDL in a blended and self-directed group learning environment, we hope to tap on a different set of motivation that is proposed in the self-determination theory to encourage learners to participate and complete the SDL topics presented to them. The study gathered perceptions and opinions of learners on their SDL experiences in the blended and self-directed group learning environment. We analyzed to see if their needs for competence, autonomy, and relatedness could be met and whether the initial exposure of SDL in the blended and self-directed group learning environment could help them become more independent to self-direct their learning in more advanced topics. Initial results found that participation and completion rate for this SDL implementation was encouraging. Most learners reported that they faced less stress and found it easier to clarify doubts they had had the option to interact with other learners face-to-face.

Authors (New): 
Flex TIO
Pages: 
Volume 2, pp.23-33
Affiliations: 
Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore
Keywords: 
Blended Learning
Group learning
Self-directed Learning
student motivation
Self-determination theory
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Bonk, C. J., & Lee, M. M. (2017). Motivations, achievements, and challenges of self-directed informal learners in open educational environments and MOOCs. Journal of Learning for Development, 4(1), 36-57.: 
Cleveland-Innes, M., Stenbom, S., & Gauvreau, S. (2017). Technology and teaching in engineering education: A blended course for faculty. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary. Calgary, Alberta, Canada.: 
University of Calgary. Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.: 
FitzPatrick, T. (2012). Key success factors of eLearning in education: A professional development model to evaluate and support eLearning. US-China Education Review, 789-795.: 
Fukuda, E., Suzuki, M., Hashimoto, S., & Okazaki, H. (2014). Encouraging self-directed group learning through an e-portfolio system. Proceedings of the 2014 EUROCALL Conference, Groningen, The Netherlands (pp. 102-106). Dublin: Research-publishing.net.: 
Kim, K. J. (2004). Motivational influences in self-directed online learning environments: A qualitative case study. Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Chicago, IL.: 
Li, S.-T., Tancredi, D. J., Co, J. P., & West, D. C. (2010). Factors associated with successful self-directed learning using individualized learning plans during pediatric residency. Academic Pediatrics, 10(2), 124-130.: 
Madtha, J. L. (2015, April). Motivation and Encouragement in Teaching Slow Learners. International Journal of Current Research, VII(4), 14643-14644.: 
Seow, B. Y. (2015, October 29). Using technology to nurse lifelong learning. Retrieved May 21, 2018, from The Straits Times: https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/manpower/using-technology-to-nurse-lifelong-learning: 
Go to top
randomness