Fab Lab As An Implementation Tool Of The CDIO Program

Fab Lab As An Implementation Tool Of The CDIO Program

J. Zagal, F. Torres, M. Diaz, X. Vargas, H. Agusto, P. Poblete (2013).  Fab Lab As An Implementation Tool Of The CDIO Program. 11.

The CDIO program sustain that the core of engineering is built up on four fundamental activities (C: Conceive, D: Design, I: Implement and O: Operate) and concentrates on the development and spread out of teaching techniques that allow students to master these skills. 

Project courses involving the generation of real engineering systems are seen as a great opportunity for students to acquire this knowledge, while collaborating with teammates under the guidance of professors. Unfortunately, it is difficult to find a suitable subject to enable people to practice the whole CDIO chain over the few months of a course. Most projects will end up on the firsts stages of conception (C) and design (D).

We hypothesize that implementation time (construction of real prototypes) is one important obstacle for the practice of the CDIO program, specially if projects are to be done on one semester courses.

Our proposal is to use Digital Fabrication Laboratories as a tool for the rapid implementation and operation of engineering systems. We report our experience on the development of short period courses involving the whole CDIO chain, thanks to the use of rapid prototyping tools. We comment on how these tools might impact the early conception and design stages as well.



Proceedings of the 9th International CDIO Conference, Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Harvard University School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 9 – 13, 2013. 

 

Authors (New): 
Juan C. Zagal
Fernando Torres
Marcos Diaz
Ximena Vargas
Hector Agusto
Patricio V. Poblete
Pages: 
11
Affiliations: 
University of Chile, Chile
Keywords: 
CDIO
Fab Lab
Digital Fabrication
Learning System
rapid prototyping
Year: 
2013
Reference: 
Crawley E., Malmqvist J., Lucas W. and Brodeur, “The CDIO Syllabus v2.0, An Updated Statement of Goals for Engineering Education”, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, 2011.: 
Dabbish L., Colleen S., Tsay J. and Herbsleb J., "Social Coding in Github: Transparency and Collaboration in an Open Software Repository", Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1277-1286. ACM, 2012.: 
Gershenfeld N., “How to Make Almost Anything, The Digital Fabrication Revolution”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 91 num. 6, Nov/Dec 2012.: 
Gunnarsson, S., Eles, P., Krantz-Rülcker, T. and Frykman, P., "Survey of Laboratory Exercises within the Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering (Y) program at Linköping University," Technical Report, Applied Physics and Electrical Engineering, Linköping University, 2002.: 
Mardones J., Becerra A., Diaz M. and Zagal J.C., “Using Digital Fabrication on CubeSat Satellite Projects”, Proceedings of Small Satellites, Systems and Services, The 4S Symposium, 2012.: 
Official Fab Lab machine list’s site, http://fab.cba.mit.edu/content/tools/machines/index.html: 
Somerville M., Anderson D., Berbeco H., Bourne J. R. et al, “The Olin Curriculum: Thinking Towards The Future”, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol 48, no. 1 (2005), pp.198-205.: 
Wallin, H-P., Östlund, S., “CDIO Workshops and Laboratories Survey for the Vehicle Engineering Program at Royal Institute of Technology, KTH”, Technical Report, Department of Vehicle Engineering, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden, 2002.: 
Workspace benchmarking at CDIO site, http://www.cdio.org/implementing-cdio-yourinstitution/implementation-kit/design-build-and-workspaces/workspaces: 
Go to top
randomness