FRAMEWORK FOR AN INTEGRATED LEARNING BLOCK WITH CDIO-LED ENGINEERING EDUCATION

FRAMEWORK FOR AN INTEGRATED LEARNING BLOCK WITH CDIO-LED ENGINEERING EDUCATION

M. Abdulla, M. Troop, A. Majeed (2020).  FRAMEWORK FOR AN INTEGRATED LEARNING BLOCK WITH CDIO-LED ENGINEERING EDUCATION. Volume 2, pp.150-159.

As a CDIO collaborating member, Sheridan’s School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Technology (MEET) maintains a curriculum that is deeply rooted in skills-based learning, experiential learning, and engineering design. To ensure our graduates are consistently agile and ready for the workforce, we are taking proactive measures to further improve their learning experiences. An important challenge still impeding our students’ knowledge acquisition is the perception that program courses have disjointed learning outcomes. In reality, the course map of programs is carefully designed in such a way that technical skills acquired in particular courses gradually build on each other. Despite the traditional existence of prerequisites and co-requisites, the inaccurate view that courses function independently persists among students and, occasionally, among faculty members. One feasible approach to tackle this pedagogical challenge is to combine various courses into an integrated learning block (ILB) having a unified mission and objective. In general, an ILB is formed by the interconnectivity of at least two courses. At Sheridan's School of MEET, we are applying an ILB with three engineering courses offered within the same semester for all of our Bachelor’s of Engineering degree programs. The ILB deliverables are based on the design of a chosen engineering system or subunit in a project-based learning (PBL) environment. The rationale of this paper is to share Sheridan’s framework for implementing an ILB in engineering programs and to examine the opportunities and challenges related to this type of curriculum design. In particular, we will discuss the methodology by which courses are selected to form an ILB while taking into account their appropriateness for an industry-driven PBL. This will be followed up with some of the strategies that are proposed to evaluate the performance of students in an ILB through formative and summative assessments based on CDIO competencies.

Authors (New): 
Mouhamed Abdulla
Meagan Troop
Amjed Majeed
Pages: 
Volume 2, pp.150-159
Affiliations: 
Sheridan Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning, Canada
Keywords: 
Integrated Learning Block
Active learning
Project-Based Learning
Curriculum Design
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 6
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2020
Reference: 
Abdulla, M., & Shayan, Y. R. (2013). On the Peculiarities of Design: An Engineering Perspective. Proc. of the 4th Conference on Canadian Engineering Education Association - CEEA’13, (pp. 1–5). Montréal, QC, Canada. : 
10.24908/PCEEA.V0I0.4823
Abdulla, M., Motamedi, Z., & Majeed, A. (2019). Redesigning Telecommunication Engineering Courses with CDIO geared for Polytechnic Education. Proc. of the 10th Conference on Canadian Engineering Education Association - CEEA'19, (pp. 1–5). Ottawa, ON, Canada. : 
10.24908/PCEEA.VI0.13855
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Ostlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach. New York, NY: Springer.: 
Edström, K., & Kolmos, A. (2014, Sep.). PBL and CDIO: Complementary Models for Engineering Education Development. European Journal of Engineering Education, 39(5), 539-555.: 
Edström, K., Gunnarsson, S., & Gustafsson, G. (2014). Integrated Curriculum Design. In Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (pp. 85–115, Ch. 4). New York, NY: Springer.: 
Froyd, J. E., & Ohland, M. W. (2005). Integrated Engineering Curricula. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 147–164.: 
Germain, H. (2017). Autonomous Spidercam Motion Control (Master's thesis, University College London, London, UK).: 
Kolmos, A. (2017). PBL Curriculum Strategies: From Course Based PBL to a Systemic PBL Approach. In PBL in Engineering Education: International Perspectives on Curriculum Change (pp. 1–12, Ch. 1). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.: 
Leone, D., & Isaacs, B. (2001). Combining Engineering Design With Professional Ethics Using an Integrated Learning Block. Proc. of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, (pp. 1–4). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.: 
Malmqvist, J., Knutson Wedel, M., Lundqvist, U., Edström, K., Rosén, A., Fruergaard Astrup, T., . . . Kamp, A. (2019). Towards CDIO Standards 3.0. Proc. of the 15th International CDIO Conference, (pp. 44–66). Aarhus, Denmark.: 
Pace, D. (2017). The Decoding the Disciplines Paradigm: Seven Steps to Increased Student Learning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.: 
PEQAB. (2014, Dec.). Submission: Bachelor of Engineering (Mechanical Engineering), Applying for Ministerial Consent under the Post-secondary Education Choice and Excellence Act, 2000. Toronto, ON, Canada.: 
PEQAB. (2017, Feb.). Submission: Bachelor of Engineering (Electrical Engineering), Applying for Ministerial Consent under the Post-secondary Education Choice and Excellence Act, 2000. Toronto, ON, Canada.: 
Rayegani, F., & Ghalati, R. (2015). Integration of Math and Science with Sheridan Engineering Program using CDIO Tools. Proc. of the 11th International CDIO Conference (pp. 1–4). Chengdu, Sichuan, P.R. China: Chengdu University of Information Technology.: 
Shetty, D., Leone, D., Alnajjar, H., Keshawarz, S., Nagurney, L., & Smith, L. T. (2001). Integrating Engineering Design with Humanities, Sciences and Social Sciences Using Integrative Learning Blocks. Proc. of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, (pp. 1–9). Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.: 
The CDIO Initiative. (2010). The CDIO Standards v2.0. CDIO Knowledge Library.: 
Wiggins, G. P., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by Design (Expand second ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.: 
Zabudsky, J., Rayegani, F., & Ghafari, S. (2014). Sheridan Journey: Shaping Ideal Engineering Programs based on CDIO Approach. Proc. of the 10th International CDIO Conference (pp. 1–9). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya.: 
Go to top