Integration of Generic Skills in Engineering Education: Increased Student Engagement Using a CDIO Approach

Home » Integration of Generic ...

Integration of Generic Skills in Engineering Education: Increased Student Engagement Using a CDIO Approach

T. Mejtoft, J. Vesterberg (2017).  Integration of Generic Skills in Engineering Education: Increased Student Engagement Using a CDIO Approach. 10.
2017 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Canada
PDF icon 89_Final_PDF.pdf

Engineering education with a close connection to future profession is important and popular in many parts of the world. To be able to work as an engineer and be qualified for a future career, not only the disciplinary knowledge is important for building professional skills but also inter-disciplinary and generic skills (e.g. Mechefske et al., 2005; Schwieler, 2007). The CDIO model (Crawley, et al., 2007) provides a broad base for the generic skills that can be expected by both current and future engineers and with the right design and implementation, a wide range of the personal and interpersonal skills stated in the CDIO syllabus can be met. Furthermore, integration of such skills in disciplinary courses might increase students’ motivation and give disciplinary knowledge more realistic contexts (Mejtoft, 2016). This case study illustrates and analyzes how setting up a touch-point between two courses in a project work can push the education further towards the ideas of CDIO. The paper seek to present pros and cons integration of generic skills in disciplinary projects and is based on surveys and interviews with students and teachers. Using project-based learning something that has been deemed appropriate and successful in engineering education (De Graaff & Kolmos, 2003; Mills & Treagust, 2003).

The paper is based on an action based research approach implementing changes in two courses on the Master of Science in Interaction Technology study program at Umeå University. The courses are “Project management” (7.5 ECTS) at the department of applied physics and electronics and the disciplinary course “Interactivity in smart environments” (7.5 ECTS) at the department of computer science. The implementation is based on using the project on the course as the starting point and basis of project management on the course “Project management”. This was a change compared to previous years when a “fake project” without disciplinary connection had been used on the project management course.

Even though the students’ motivation for acquiring generic skills, such as project management sills, one thing that has been raised in previous evaluations is that the lack of realistic situation in the project work. The results from this project show that integration of generic skills in disciplinary courses instead of reading general courses with generic skills, increase the students’ engagement and motivation of learning project management and interpersonal skills according to the CDIO. The result shows that well-implemented changes to the courses and creating touch-points between them, have led to an environment of increased personal and interpersonal skills for the students. Hence, by working with cases and projects that is closely connected to the students’ discipline, their inner motivation, need and will to increase their learning in adjacent areas, such as project management, increase. This paper further discusses the challenges for teacher in integrating generic skills in disciplinary courses and combining different courses with the aim of increasing students’ inner motivation.

Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference in Calgary, Canada, June 18-22 2017

Authors (New): 
Thomas Mejtoft
Jimmy Vesterberg
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Umeå University, Sweden
Keywords: 
Project management
Case-based
project work
CDIO Standard 1
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2017
Reference: 
Aleamoni, L. M., & Hexner, P. Z. (1980). A review of the research on student evaluation and a report on the effect of different sets of instructions on student course and instructor evaluation. Instructional Science, 9(1), 67-84.: 
Cardozo, R. N., Durfee, W. K., Ardichvili, A., Adams, C., Erdman, A. G., Hoey, M., Iaizzo, P. A., Mallick, D. N., Bar-Cohen, A., Beachy, R., & Johnson, A. (2002). Perspective: Experiential education in new product design and business development. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(1), 4-17: 
CDIO Initiative. (n.d.). CDIO Vision. Retrieved from http://www.cdio.org/cdio-vision: 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. Springer.: 
De Graaff, E., & Kolmos, A. (2003) Characteristics of problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 19(5), 657-662.: 
Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The interview. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 695-727). Sage Publications.: 
Fowler, F. J. (2014). Survey research methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications. : 
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317-333). Cambridge University Press.: 
Mechefske, C. K., Wyss, U. P., Surgenor, B. W., & Kubrick, N. (2005). Alumni/ae surveys as tools for directing change in engineering curriculum. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association: 
Mejtoft, T. (2015). Industry based projects and cases: A CDIO approach to students' learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference. Chengdu University of Information Technology: 
Mejtoft, T. (2016). Integrating business skills in engineering education: Enhancing learning using a CDIO approach. In J. Björkqvist, K. Edström, R. J. Hugo, J. Kontio, J. Roslöf, R. Sellens & S. Virtanen (Eds.), The 12th International CDIO Conference Proceedings - Full Papers (pp. 689-698). Turku University of Applied Sciences/CDIO Initiative.: 
Mills, J. E., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education - Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer? Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3, 2-16.: 
Pant, I., & Baroudi, B. (2008). Project management education: The human skills imperative. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 124-128.: 
Schunk, D. H., Meece, J. R., & Pintrich, P. R. (2014). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (4th Ed.). Pearson Education Limited.: 
Schwieler, E. (2007). Anställningsbarhet: Begrepp, principer och premisser. UPC-rapport 2007:2. Stockholms universitet.: 
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 695-727). Sage Publications.: 
Stevenson, D. H., & Starkweather, J. A. (2010). PM critical competency index: IT execs prefer soft skills. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 663-671.: 
Turner, J., & Paris, S. G. (1995). How Literacy Tasks Influence Children's Motivation for Literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662-673.: 
Wright, L. (1997). Integrating generic skills into the curriculum. Overview - University of Wollongong Teaching & Learning Journal, 4(2), 51-55.: 
Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.: 
on August 11, 2017 - 07:24   MAndersson
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top
randomness