Intended Learning Outcomes: A Process Of Formulating Intended Learning Outcomes At Program Level

Home » Intended Learning Outc ...

Intended Learning Outcomes: A Process Of Formulating Intended Learning Outcomes At Program Level

T. Minh, B. Pham, K. Doan (2012).  Intended Learning Outcomes: A Process Of Formulating Intended Learning Outcomes At Program Level . 12.
2012 8th International CDIO Conference, Queensland UT, Australia
PDF icon learning_outcomes_a_process_of_formulating_learning_outcomes_at_program_level_.pdf

Under the goal of the Fundamental and Comprehensive Reform of Higher Education (HE) in Vietnam 2006-2020 that Vietnam has an advanced HE system achieving international standards by 2020, Ministry of Education and Training (MOET) has introduced a number of initiatives aiming to meet this increased demand for education. The most recent and important change is, for the first time, MOET’s mandate (MOET 2009) for development and public declaration of intended learning outcomes (ILOs) of every university department program. However, the existing descriptors (Education Law 2005) for formulation of ILOs are only general statements of educational goals, or the guidelines document (MOET 2010) only instructs that ILOs include knowledge, skills, attitude, and lifelong learning skills.

The CDIO Initiative provides an integrated framework consisting of the CDIO Syllabus and the CDIO Standards to identify ILOs of a program, and to construct a sequence of learning experiences to meet those ILOs. Based on the CDIO Standard 2 and the Syllabus v.2 as a proof of concept, this paper proposes to develop a Process of Formulating ILOs at Program Level (PF-ILOs) for various university department programs to formulate their specific ILOs. In particular, we present: (i) use of CDIO Standard 2 and adaptations of the CDIO Syllabus for formulating ILOs at our strategic university departments; (ii) adaptations of the CDIO Syllabus to diverse education programs; (iii) the Program ILOs Syllabus that has been proposed for Vietnam National University-Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM) based on a generalization of the CDIO Syllabus v.2 and student learning outcomes taxonomies; and (iv) use of the pilot implementation of CDIO as a means to develop the PF-ILOs, which can be replicated at other universities within VNU-HCM and throughout Vietnam.

This paper significantly contributes to the extension of CDIO application to a wide range of disciplines in particular, and promotes the PF-ILOs, which permits university department programs to formulate and improve their ILOs. 

 

Authors (New): 
Trinh Doan Thi Minh
Bang Cong Pham
Khiem Ngoc Doan
Pages: 
12
Affiliations: 
Vietnam National University (VNU-HCM), Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
Keywords: 
learning outcomes
CDIO Syllabus v.2
implementation of CDIO
VNU-HCM
Year: 
2012
Reference: 
Binh Phan Thanh, et. al., “Development of A Model Framework for CDIO Implementation In Vietnam”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010. : 
E. Crawley, J. Malmqvist, S. Ostlund, D. Brodeur, Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach, Springer, 2007. : 
Edward F. Crawley, “Creating the CDIO syllabus, a universal template for engineering education”, Proceedings of the 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Boston MA, November 6-9 2002, pp. 8 – 13. : 
N. Houbak and P. Klit, “Mechanical engineering curriculum at DTU and the application of CDIO in first year courses”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, June 7-8, 2005. : 
K. Bjerner and S. Granath, “Development of three bachelor programmes at Linköping University according to CDIO”, Proceedings of the 1st Annual CDIO Conference, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, June 7-8, 2005. : 
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~smarkham/resources/anova.htm, accessed May 5, 2010. : 
Tien Ba Dinh, et. al., “First Year Experience of CDIO Adoption into an Information Technology Program, Proceedings of the 7th International CDIO Conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20 - 23, 2011. : 
Svante Gunnarsson, et. al., “Large Scale Use of The CDIO Syllabus In Formulation of Program and Course Goals”, Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 11-14, 2007. : 
Dung Anh Vu and Nha Xuan Phung, “Adapting the CDIO approach in developing learning outcomes for economics and business disciplines in Vietnam: a case-study of University of Economics and Business at Vietnam National University, Hanoi”, Proceedings of the 6th International CDIO Conference, École Polytechnique, Montréal, June 15-18, 2010. : 
Vietnam National University, Hanoi, Guidelines for Curriculum Design and Development Based on CDIO Approach, 2010. : 
The Ho Chi Minh City College of Foreign Languages and IT (HUFLIT), CDIO-Based Intended Learning Outcomes, 2011. : 
European Commission, “Explaining the European Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning”, http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/education_cultureEuropean, accessed Jan. 2, 2012. : 
ENAEE (European Network for Accreditation of Engineering Education), “EUR-ACE (Framework Standards for the Accreditation of Engineering Programmes), 2008”, http://www.enaee.eu/theeur-ace-system/eur-ace-framework-standards/, accessed Jan. 2, 2012. : 
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), United State, http://www.abet.org/engineering-criteria-2012-2013/ accessed Jan. 10, 2012. : 
Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board (CEAB), “Accreditation Criteria and Procedures, 2011”, http://www.engineerscanada.ca/e/pu_ab.cfm, accessed Jan. 10, 2012.: 
Engineers Australia, “Engineers Australia Policy on Accreditation of Professional Engineering Programs, 2006”, http://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/about-us/program-accreditation, accessed Feb. 24, 2012: 
International Engineering Alliance, “The Washington Accord”, http://www.washingtonaccord.org/Washington-Accord/, accessed Feb. 24, 2012.: 
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET), United State, http://www.abet.org/asac-criteria-2012-2013/, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
The Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB), United State, http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/standards/, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
Financial Planning Standards Board (FPSB), United State, http://www.fpsb.org/certificationandstandards/curriculum-framework.html, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
Global Accreditation Centre for Project Management (GAC), United State, http://www.pmi.org/Professional-Development/~/media/PDF/ProfessionalDevelopment/GAC_handbook_2010.ashx, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
Teacher Education Accreditation Council (TEAC), United State, http://www.teac.org/accreditation/steps-to-accreditation/, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
American Bar Association (ABA), United State, http://www.americanbar.org/groups/legal_education/resources/standards.html, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), United State, http://www.lcme.org/standard.htm, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
Bloom's Taxonomy of Learning Domains, http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html, accessed Feb. 24, 2012. : 
on January 24, 2013 - 13:42   jenroy
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top