International Expectations of Engineering Graduate Attributes

R. Paul, R. Hugo, L. Falls (2015). International Expectations of Engineering Graduate Attributes. 14.

2015 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu University of IT, China

As societal and organizational dynamics change, the skills expected from graduating engineers also change. Regulating bodies worldwide mandate and update these expectations with engineering graduate attributes or competency guidelines. These regulations direct engineering education institutions towards the expected outcomes of the engineering curriculum. Within the curriculum, the graduate attributes are taught through a variety of teaching and learning activities (TLAs). This study is conducted in two phases: the first phase involves performing a survey and comparison of international engineering graduate attributes; the second phase involves a literature survey of best practices, as reported in the literature, describing TLAs which best develop these attributes.

The first phase of this study compares international graduate attribute lists for common skill requirements of graduating engineers. Graduate attribute guidelines from worldwide engineering regulating bodies were collected. The data was analyzed using content analysis and constant comparative methods in order to reduce the data down into main themes. Five overall themes of engineering graduate attributes were identified: knowledge base, professionalism, problem solving, diverse work setting, and design. These five themes were split into 21 categories. Proximity analysis was then used to compare the resulting categories to the original data, providing insight into the relationship between the categories.

Once the international expectations of engineering graduate attributes were defined and categorized, the second phase determined how institutions develop, assess, and measure these attributes in undergraduate engineering students. A summary is provided of the TLAs used for each outcome and any instruments that measured the effectiveness of these activities, including assessments of student learning and evaluations of professor implementation. Through this process, an understanding is gained of the teaching and learning practices that develop each attribute.

The results from this study will develop an inclusive summary of international engineering graduate attributes, followed by TLAs that can be used to achieve these attributes. Engineering institutions seeking to improve their curriculum or strengthen development in specific graduate attributes can use the results of this paper to identify the appropriate TLAs that can assist in the process of continuous program improvement. The paper ends by highlighting the engineering graduate attributes for which there appears to be an insufficient number of TLAs reported in the literature. This result can be used to suggest a path for future research.

Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China, June 8-11 2015

Authors (New):

Robyn Paul

Ronald J Hugo

Lynne Cowe Falls

Pages:

Affiliations:

University of Calgary, Canada

Keywords:

Graduate Attributes

Washington Accord

Qualitative Content Analysis

CDIO Syllabus

CDIO Standard 2

CDIO Standard 3

Year:

2015

Reference:

Ashton, M., Bailey, J., Coomber, N., Goodell, K., & Weiland, K. (2012). The value of multidisciplinary engineering education after graduate: an empirical study. Paper presented at the Industrial and Systems Engineering Research Conference.:

Boeing. (1996). Desired Attributes of an Engineer. Retrieved from http://www.boeing.com:

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.:

Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., Brodeur, D. R., & Edström, K. (2014). Rethinking Engineering Education: The CDIO Approach (2nd Ed.). Springer International Publishing.:

Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.:

Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity: Advances in methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press:

Goldberg, D. E., & Sommerville, M. (2014). A Whole New Engineer: The Coming Revolution in Engineering Education,. ThreeJoy Associates, Inc.:

Gordon, B. M. (1984). What is an engineer? In European Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference (Vol. Keynote). Erlandgen, Germany: University of ErlandgenNurnberg.:

Hanrahan, H. (2011). The Washington Accord Past, Present, Future. Retrieved from http://www.ieagreements.org/Washington-Accord/Washington-Accord-Overview.pdf:

Huet, G., Spooner, D., Vadean, A., Leblanc, T., Camarero, R., & Fortin, C. (2008). Development of collaborative and social skills through multidisciplinary design projects. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education.:

IEA. (2014). The Washington Accord. Retrieved January 10, 2015, from http://www.ieagreements.org/Washington-Accord/:

Karim, A. A., Abdullah, N., Rahman, A. A., Noah, S. M., Jaafar, W. W., Othman, J., & ... Said, H. (2012). A Nationwide Comparative Study between Private and Public University Students' Soft Skills. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(3), 541-548.:

Litzinger, T. A., Lattuca, L. R., Hadgraft, R. G., Newstetter, W. C., Alley, M., Atman, C., & … Yasuhara, K. (2011). Engineering education and the development of expertise. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(1), 123-150.:

Maranville, D., Kate, O’Neill, K., & Plumb, C. (2011). Lessons for Legal Education from the Engineering Profession’s Experience with Outcomes-Based Accreditation. William Mitchel Law Review, 38(1), 1017-1093.:

Martello, R., & Stolk, J. (2007). Paul revere in the science lab: Integrating humanities and engineering pedagogies to develop skills in contextual understanding and self-directed learning. Paper presented at the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings.:

Mckenna, A. F., Froyd, J., & Litzinger, T. (2014). The complexities of transforming engineering higher education: Preparing for next steps. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 188–192.:

McMasters, J. H. (2004). Influencing Engineering Education: One (Aerospace) Industry Perspective. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3).:

NAE. (2007). Rising above the gathering storm; energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. National Academies Press.:

Neumeyer, X., Chen, W., & McKenna, A. F. (2013). Embedding context in teaching engineering design. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(4).:

Seeley, B. E. (1999). The other re-engineering of engineering education, 1900–1965. Journal of Engineering Education, 285–294.:

Teerijoki, H., & Murdock, K. A. (2014). Assessing the role of the teacher in introducing entrepreneurial education in engineering and science courses. International Journal of Management Education, 12(3), 479-489.:

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative Analysis of Content. In Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science (pp. 308– 319). Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.:

on August 4, 2015 - 04:55 MAndersson

International Expectations of Engineering Graduate Attributes

Navigation

International Expectations of Engineering Graduate Attributes

Share this content.