AN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS AND ENABLERS FOR LIFELONG LEARNING IN ENGINEERING

AN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS AND ENABLERS FOR LIFELONG LEARNING IN ENGINEERING

J. Bennedsen, G. ien, E. Foo, E. Goh, J. Roslöf, S. Moh, et al (2024).  AN INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVE ON BARRIERS AND ENABLERS FOR LIFELONG LEARNING IN ENGINEERING.

This paper extends the use of a framework identifying four types of barriers to lifelong learning (LLL): institutional, situational, dispositional, and informational. Initially applied to Nordic universities, the framework is now used to interview a broader set of international stakeholders about LLL provisioning. The study explores commonalities and differences across regions, and the framework's potential to highlight key barriers and enablers, informing strategic and policy changes. The countries involved are Denmark, Norway, Finland, The Netherlands, and Singapore. Following the description from each country, it identifies institutional, situational, dispositional, and informational barriers, which are interrelated and influence LLL in an international context. Challenges include funding, balancing job and family commitments, and the need for a learner-centric approach. The study reveals that LLL plays a minor role in universities, with insufficient encouragement despite being included in strategies. Major obstacles include restrictive legislation, bureaucratic boundaries, and unstable funding models. Overcoming these could enable nationwide or transnational platforms for LLL. 

Authors (New): 
Jens Bennedsen
Geir Egil Dahle Øien
Edwin Foo
Eunice Goh
Janne Roslöf
Sin Moh
Hans Gelten
Affiliations: 
Aarhus University, Denmark
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
Nanyang Polytechnic, Singapore
Åbo Akademi University, Åbo, Finland
Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, Netherlands
Keywords: 
lifelong learning
framework evaluation
enablers and barriers for lifelong learning
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 9
CDIO Standard 11
Year: 
2024
Reference: 
Bennedsen, J., & Oien, G. E. D. (2023). Transnational Collaboration On Lifelong Learning Between Higher Engineering Education Institutions: A University Perspective. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). DOI: 10.21427/2F51-E932 : 
10.21427/2F51-E932
CNA (2023). 8 in 10 eligible Singaporeans aged under 30 yet to use SkillsFuture credits, at https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/eligible-singaporeans-skillsfuture-credits-upskilling-upgrading-learning-training-courses-3755766: 
Cross, K. Patricia (1981). Adults as learners: increasing participation and facilitating learning.Jossey-Bass classics. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.: 
Darkenwald, Gordon G., and Sharan B. Merriam (1982). Adult education: foundations of practice. New York: Harper & Row.: 
Eurostat (2022). Adult learning statistics [Data extracted in May 2023]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Adult_learning_statistics : 
Gelten et al (2023). A challenge-based learning community for hydrogen development and application, 19th CDIO International Conference, Trondheim, Norway, Conference Proceedings, 2023.: 
Ministry of Education and Culture Finland (2022). National higher education strategy on lifelong learning [in Finnish]. https://okm.fi/ : 
MOM (2022). Labour Force in Singapore, 2022 edition, Manpower Research & Statistics Department, Ministry of Manpower: 
SBR (2016). This is what Singaporeans really think of the SkillsFuture Initiative, at https://sbr.com.sg/economy/news/what-singaporeans-really-think-skillsfuture-initiative : 
Go to top
randomness