LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEVELOPING AND OPERATING A LARGE-SCALE PROJECT COURSE

Home » LESSONS LEARNED FROM D ...

LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEVELOPING AND OPERATING A LARGE-SCALE PROJECT COURSE

E. Saalman, L. Peterson, J. Malmqvist (2009).  LESSONS LEARNED FROM DEVELOPING AND OPERATING A LARGE-SCALE PROJECT COURSE. 17.
2009 5th International CDIO Conference, Singapore Polytechnic, Singapore
PDF icon A3.2.pdf

In 2004, Chalmers University of Technology in Göteborg, Sweden, decided to develop a project-based course for third-year students enrolled in its five-year engineering programmes. The motives were (a) that many of these programmes lacked a project course aimed at developing skills in project planning, teamwork and communication prior to the fifthyear master thesis project, and (b) that the introduction of a Bologna framework-style 3+2 education required the introduction of a bachelor thesis project. The project course was offered for the first time in spring 2007.

The aims of the Chalmers project course are that the students should integrate, deepen and develop knowledge and competency acquired during the first three study years. The course also aims to give the students good competencies to participate in project teams, using a critical and reflecting way of addressing and solving the project task. The project course is a large-scale endeavour: The course is compulsory for the students of fourteen “Civilingenjör” (MSc in Engineering) programmes and the Architecture programme. Each year, around 900 students are enrolled, working on 200 projects in many different areas, ranging from fundamental physics to architecture. The course size is 15 ECTS credits. A large number of faculty and staff are involved – teachers, administrative staff, librarians, linguistic staff etc. The course is very complex with all its different course elements that need to be coordinated.

The aim of the paper is to describe the development process of the project course, account for the course design, including the intended learning outcomes, the teaching approach and the assessment schema and to evaluate the experience from running the courses focusing on challenges deriving from the scale of the course, and from assessment of team-based project courses.

The project course has been carefully evaluated during its first two years. The evaluation results show that there have been problems with to provide clear and consistent information to students and staff and to clarify roles and responsibilities. Despite these information issues the students have a highly positive attitude towards the project course. Also the teachers are very satisfied with the quality and conduct of the students project work. 

Authors (New): 
Elisabeth Saalman
Lena Peterson
Johan Malmqvist
Pages: 
17
Affiliations: 
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Keywords: 
project courses
large-scale
generic competencies
Assessment
CDIO engineering education
Year: 
2009
Reference: 
Leifer, L., “Evaluating Product-Based-Learning Education”, Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Evaluation on Engineering Education, Osaka, Japan, 1995. : 
Aalborg University, Work Methods at AAU, http://studyguide.aau.dk/workmethod, accessed on April 8, 2009. : 
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Brodeur, D. R, Östlund, S. Rethinking Engineering Education – The CDIO Approach, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2007. : 
Svensson, T., Krysander, C., The LIPS Project Model, Technical Report, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2004. : 
Zavbi, R., Tavcar, J., Verlinden, J., “Educating Future Product Developers in Virtual Collaboration: Five Years of the E-GPR Course”, In Higher Creativity for Virtual Teams: Developing Platforms for Co-creation, Hershey, PA, USA, 2007, pp 48-74. : 
Edström, K., El Gaidi, K., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., “Integrated Assessment of Disciplinary, Personal and Interpersonal skills - Student Perceptions of a Novel Learning Experience”, Proceeding of the 13th Conference on Improving Student Learning, London, UK, 2005. : 
Schneider B., McDonald S.-K., Scale-up in education. Volume 1: Ideas in principle, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2007. : 
Malmqvist, J. Young, P. W., Hallström, S., Kuttenkeuler, J., Svensson, T. Lessons Learned from Design-build-test-based Project Courses. Proceedings of Design-2004, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2004, pp 665-672. : 
Kovacevic, A., “Competence Development on an International Product Design Course”, Proceedings Design 2008, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2008, pp 1383-1392. : 
Ministry of Education and Research. Higher Education Ordinance, SFS 1993:100, with amendments up to SFS 2006:1054, Stockholm, Sweden, 2006. : 
Chalmers University of Technology, Bachelor Thesis Web page, http://www.chalmers.se/sections/ar_student/kandidatarbete, accessed on April 8, 2009. (In Swedish.): 
Kotter, J. P. “Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail”, Harvard Business Review, 1995, pp 59-67. : 
on December 9, 2018 - 12:04   Tyrone Machado
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top