LIFELONG LEARNING AS EXPLICIT PART OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES: A CASE STUDY

Home » LIFELONG LEARNING AS E ...

LIFELONG LEARNING AS EXPLICIT PART OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES: A CASE STUDY

R. Dujardin, S. Craps, G. Langie, L. Van den Broeck, U. Beagon, C. De Paor, et al (2023).  LIFELONG LEARNING AS EXPLICIT PART OF ENGINEERING PROGRAMMES: A CASE STUDY. 902-912.
2023 19th International CDIO Conference, NTNU, Norway
PDF icon CDIO 2023 Proceedings (181).pdf

Today’s workplace is characterized by continuous technological advancements and shifting requirements in the labour market, increasing the need for lifelong learning (LLL) competencies for engineers. By focusing on LLL in the curriculum, engineering students are made aware of the importance of LLL competencies, preparing them for their future as an engineer in the working field. To carefully and concretely formulate learning outcomes is considered good practice in education, especially for professional competencies. In this study, the learning outcomes of three engineering specialisation tracks were analysed. Firstly, the learning outcomes are mapped against five LLL competencies, namely (1) self-monitoring, (2) locating and scrutinizing information, (3) self-reflection, (4) creating a learning plan and (5) willingness, motivation, and curiosity to learn. Secondly, heat maps were created to visualise cold and hotspots of learning outcomes on LLL throughout the engineering programme. In line with the general view that professional competencies are only occasionally integrated into learning outcomes, findings show that LLL competencies are not fully embedded in the learning outcomes. Two out of five LLL competencies, namely creating a learning plan and willingness, motivation, and curiosity to learn, are not present in any of the learning outcomes. Additionally, hotspots of learning outcomes on LLL are limited to the first and/or final year of the programme. This case study is a first step towards enhancing our knowledge on how LLL is implemented in learning outcomes. The selected mapping technique and heat map visualisation can be used in future work to evaluate study programmes and to inform curriculum development.

Authors (New): 
Rani Dujardin
Sofie Craps
Greet Langie
Lynn Van den Broeck
Una Beagon
Caitriona De Paor
Aimee Byrne
Pages: 
902-912
Affiliations: 
De Nayer Campus, Belgium
School of Transport and Structural Engineering, Dublin, Ireland
Keywords: 
lifelong learning
Engineering education
Curriculum
competencies
learning outcomes
CDIO Standard 2
CDIO Standard 12
Year: 
2023
Reference: 
Adam, S. (2004). Using learning outcomes; A consideration of the nature, role, application and implications for European education of employing ‘learning outcomes’ at the local, national and international levels. United Kingdom Bologna Seminar, 1-2 July 2004, Heriot-Watt University (Edinburgh Conference Centre) , July, 30.: 
Adam, S. (2008). Learning outcomes current developments in Europe: Update on the issues and applications of learning outcomes associated with the Bologna Process. Bologna Seminar: Learning Outcomes Based Higher Education: The Scottish Experience, February, 20. ttp://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/hogeronderwijs/bologna/BolognaSeminars/documents/Edinburgh/Edinburgh_Feb08_Adams.pdf: 
An, H. (2020). Scale - color scale generator. hihayk.github.io/scale: 
Armstrong, P., & Niewoehner, R. (2008). the CDIO Approach To the Development of Student Skills and Attributes. 2008 4th International CDIO Conference, Hogeschool Gent, Belgium.: 
Cheah, S., Wong, Y., & Yang, K. (2019). A Model to Explicitely Teach Self-directed Learning to Chemical Engineering Students. 2019 15th International CDIO Conference, Aarhus University, Denmark.: 
Cruz, M. L., Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Groen, P. (2020a). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. In European Journal of Engineering Education (Vol. 45, Issue 5, pp. 729–757). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1671810: 
Cruz, M. L., Saunders-Smits, G. N., & Groen, P. (2020b). Evaluation of competency methods in engineering education: a systematic review. In European Journal of Engineering Education (Vol. 45, Issue 5, pp. 729–757). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1671810: 
Fitzpatrick, J. J., Byrne, E. P., & Kennedy, D. (2009). Making programme learning outcomes explicit for students of process and chemical engineering. Education for Chemical Engineers, 4(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2009.07.001: 
Gaebel, M., Zhang, T., Bunescu, L., & Stoeber, H. (2018). Learning and teaching in the European higher education area. European University Association asbl.: 
Grant, A. M., Franklin, J., & Langford, P. (2002). The self-reflection and insight scale: A new measure of private self-consciousness. Social Behavior and Personality, 30(8), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2002.30.8.821: 
Grossnickle, E. M. (2016). Disentangling Curiosity: Dimensionality, Definitions, and Distinctions from Interest in Educational Contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 28, 23–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9294-y: 
Hotifah, Y., Suryanto, Hamidah, & Yoenanto, N. H. (2020). Determinant Factors of Willingness to Learn: Systematic Literature Review. 508(October 2019), 700–704. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201214.322: 
Huitt, W. (2011). Motivation to learn: An overview. Educational Psychology Interactive. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/motivation/motivate.html: 
Jenkins, Alan & Unwin, D. (2001). How to write learning outcomes. available. https://www.ubalt.edu/cas/faculty/faculty-matters/How to write student learning outcomes.pdf: 
Kennedy, D. (2006). Writing and using learning outcomes (Hans Grof Reese, trad.). A Practical Guide, 1–103. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/Manual_X/Manual_X_Chapter_8.pdf: 
Kovacs, H., Delisle, J., Mekhaiel, M., Zufferey, J. D., Tormey, R., & Vuilliomenet, P. (2020). Teaching Transversal Skills in the Engineering Curriculum: The Need to Raise the Temperature. 48th Annual Conference, Enschede, the Netherlands, 930–942.: 
Maher, A. (2004). Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: Implications for Curriculum Design and Student Learning. The Journal of Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism, 3(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.3794/johlste.32.78: 
Martínez-Mediano, C., & Lord, S. M. (2012). Lifelong Learning Program for engineering students. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2012.6201072: 
Mourtos, N. J. (2003). Defining, teaching and assessing lifelong learning skills. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 1, T3B14-T3B19. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2003.1263325: 
Orón Semper, J. V., & Blasco, M. (2018). Revealing the Hidden Curriculum in Higher Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 37(5), 481–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-018-9608-5: 
Peat, M., Taylor, C. E., & Franklin, S. (2005). Re-engineering of undergraduate science curricula to emphasise development of lifelong learning skills. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290500062482: 
Uden, L., & Dix, A. (2004). Lifelong learning for software engineers. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life-Long Learning, 14(1–2), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJCEELL.2004.004578: 
Walkington, J. (2002). A process for curriculum change in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790210129603: 
Wingate, U., & London, C. (2007). A Framework for Transition : Supporting ‘ Learning to Learn ’ in Higher Education. 61(3), 391–405.: 
Yap, J. S., & Tan, J. (2022). Lifelong learning competencies among chemical engineering students at Monash University Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38(September 2021), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.10.004: 
on November 27, 2023 - 07:01   frebyst
  • Printer-friendly version
Go to top