Reflection And Reflexivity In Reviewing And Evaluating CDIO: An Empirical Approach To Evaluation

Reflection And Reflexivity In Reviewing And Evaluating CDIO: An Empirical Approach To Evaluation

R. Clark, J. Andrews (2011).  Reflection And Reflexivity In Reviewing And Evaluating CDIO: An Empirical Approach To Evaluation. 5.

Facilitated by an Engineer and a Social Scientist, both of whom have expertise in Engineering Education Research and Evaluation (EERE), this interactive workshop is divided into three main sections, each one focusing on a different area of evaluation. It will build on research conducted at Aston University School of Engineering and Applied Science to explore and critique the value of introducing CDIO across the first year undergraduate curriculum. Participants will be invited to consider the pedagogical and engineering related challenges of evaluating the academic and practical value of CDIO as a strategy for learning and teaching in the discipline. An empirical approach to evaluation developed by the researchers to provide empirically grounded evidence of the pedagogical and vocational value of CDIO will form the theoretical and conceptual basis of the workshop. This approach is distinctive in that it encapsulates both engineering and social science methods of evaluation. It is also contemporaneous in nature, with the researchers acting as a ‘fly on the wall’ capturing data as the programme unfolds. Through facilitated discussion and participation, the workshop will provide colleagues with the opportunity to develop a cross-disciplinary, empirically grounded research proposal specifically for the purposes of critically evaluating CDIO. It is anticipated that during the workshop, colleagues will work together in small groups. Suitable pedagogical approaches and tools will be suggested and a purposefully developed Engineering Education Research Guide, written by the workshop facilitators, will be given to all participants to inform and support the Workshop approach. 

Authors (New): 
Robin Clark
Jane Andrews
Pages: 
5
Affiliations: 
Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Keywords: 
Evaluation
Evidence
CDIO
engineering education research
Year: 
2011
Reference: 
IMechE. (2009). Education for Engineering: IMECHE Policy Summary. London: Institute for Mechanical Engineering: 
RAEng. (2008). Engineering. House of Commons Committee on Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills. London. Royal Academy of Engineering.: 
Spinks, N., Silburn, N. & Birchall, D. (2006). Educating Engineers for the 21st Century: The Industrial View. London: Royal Academy of Engineers.Apple, (2011). I-pod. ) www.apple.com/ipad/ Accessed 20th January 2011. : 
LHC, (2011). Large Hadron Collidor. www.lhc.ac.uk/ Accessed 20/1/11: 
Virgin Galactic, (2011), Virgin Galactic. http://www.virgingalactic.com/ Accessed 20/1/11.: 
Apple (2011). I-Pad. www.apple.com/ipad Accessed 20/1/11.: 
Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., Elber, S. (2008). ‘Competencies Beyond Countries: The Reorganization of Engineering Education in the United States, Europe and Latin America’. Journal of Engineering Education. 97. 4. pp 433-447: 
RAEng. (2007). Educating Engineers for the 21st Century. London. Royal Academy of Engineering.: 
DIUS. (2008), A Vision for Science and Society, London, The Royal Academy of Engineering, Department of Innovation, Universities & Science.: 
NSF. (2009), Closing the Gender Skills Gap: A National Skills Forum Report on Women, Skills and Productivity, London, National Skills Forum.: 
Miller, S., Haupt, T.C., & Chileshe, N., (2005). “Student Perceptions of the First Year Civil Engineering Course Content”, Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 3, 2, pp. 180- 189.: 
Machika, P. (2007). “The Value of Bridging Programmes in Engineering at the University of Johannesburg”. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 5, 2, pp. 120-128.: 
Norton, L. (2009) Action Research in Teaching and Learning. London. Routledge. : 
Clark, R. & Andrews, J. (2011). “CDIO Evaluation: A Framework”. Paper presented at the Royal Academy of Engineering. 18th January 2011.: 
Marton, F. (1989). “Towards a Pedagogy of Content”. Educational Psychologist. 24. 1. pp 1-23: 
Go to top