THE ROLE OF PEERS IN THE ASSESMENT OF STUDENTS’ CDIO SKILLS

THE ROLE OF PEERS IN THE ASSESMENT OF STUDENTS’ CDIO SKILLS

I. D’haese, J. D’heer (2009).  THE ROLE OF PEERS IN THE ASSESMENT OF STUDENTS’ CDIO SKILLS. 8.

At the University College Ghent, staff has gained expertise in peer assessment strategies for formative and summative assessment. Recently also online facilities have become available within the electronic learning platform, enabling flexible schemes in the use of peer assessment such as use of qualitative or quantitative scales, variable group size, variable assessment criteria, …. In the Faculty of Applied Engineering Sciences as well as in the Faculty of Technology peer assessment has mainly been practiced in the framework of design-implement projects. As reflected in the pilot survey, staff and students perceive peer assessment as a valuable manner to evaluate group dynamics, personal and interpersonal skills and to extend the evaluation process from “product” to “process”. Some kinds of peer assessment appear to be an effective way in the acquirement of CDIO skills. The paper concludes with some guidelines for practitioners preparing to make use of peer assessment.

Authors (New): 
Ivan D’haese
Johan D’heer
Pages: 
8
Affiliations: 
University College Ghent, Belgium
Keywords: 
Online peer assessment
design-implement
Student perceptions
coaches
Year: 
2009
Reference: 
Dochy, F., Segers, M. and Sluijsmans, D., “The Use of Self-, Peer and Co-assessment in Higher Education: a Review”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 24(3), 1999, pp 331-350: 
Crawley, E., Malmqvist J., Ostlund, S. and Brodeur, D, Rethinking Engineering Education. The CDIO approach. Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2007.: 
“The CDIO standards”, link at website http://www.cdio.org.: 
Li, A. and Steckelberg, A., “Perceptions of Web-mediated Peer Assessment”, Academic Exchange Quarterly. Vol. 10(2), 2006, web version.: 
Wen, M. L., and Tsai, C., “University students’ perceptions and attitudes towards (online) peer assessment”, Higher Education, Vol. 51, 2006, pp 27-44.: 
Karaka, E., “ An Evaluation of Teacher Trainees’ Opinions of the Peer Assessment in Terms of some Variables”, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 6(1), 2009, pp 123-128.: 
Raban, R., and Litchfield, A.” Supporting peer assessment of individual contributions in groupwork”, Australian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 23(1), 2007, pp 34-47.: 
Go to top
randomness