STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN CDIO FRAMEWORK

STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN CDIO FRAMEWORK

A. Piironen, A. Padley, K. Saastamoinen (2018).  STUDENT-CENTERED LEARNING IN CDIO FRAMEWORK. 10.

This paper explores this intersection between Project-Based Learning (PBL) and student centricity through a CDIO case study called the Digital Wellbeing Sprint. The Sprint gathers multidisciplinary and culturally diverse students for an intensive, multi-day service innovation course where teams work on real-life problems from partner companies or organizations and explore modern tools and methods for co-creation and service design. The partnerships offer a platform for implementing Project-Based Learning which challenges students to explore the live brief from a human-centred perspective, then conceive of and design a potential solution. Successful implementation requires a teaching team willing to embrace a student-centered approach where the teacher’s role shifts from ‘sage on the stage’ to ‘guide on the side.’ To help facilitate the shift in mindset, organizers have worked to understand the value students experience from this type of learning and identify student-driven Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) that work alongside those developed by the educators. This paper gives a brief introduction to how project-based learning was used alongside co-creation and service design to support a student-centered learning environment, describes the results from the latest Sprint, shares key learnings about the implementation, and discusses future development of the concept. 

Authors (New): 
Antti K. Piironen
Ann Padley
Kaisla Saastamoinen
Pages: 
10
Affiliations: 
Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences, Finland
University of Bristol, United Kingdom
Laurea University of Applied Sciences, Finland
Keywords: 
student-centered
Project-Based Learning
Co-Creation
Intensive course
Service Design
CDIO Standard 3
CDIO Standard 5
CDIO Standard 7
CDIO Standard 8
CDIO Standard 10
Year: 
2018
Reference: 
Arene (2014). Universities of Applied Sciences. Accessed 19 December 2016. http://www.arene.fi/en/universities-applied-sciences: 
Bovill, C. (2014). An investigation of co-created curricula within higher education in the UK, Ireland and the USA. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(1), 15-25.: 
ESG (2015). Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area (ESG). Brussels, Belgium. Accessed 13 January 2017. http://www.eua.be/Libraries/quality-assurance/esg_2015.pdf?sfvrsn=0: 
Heinonen, K., Strandvik, T., Mickelsson,K.-J., Edvardsson, B., Sundström, E. Andersson, P. (2010). "A customer-dominant logic of service", Journal of Service Management, Vol. 21 Issue: 4, pp.531-548.: 
https://doi.org/10.1108/09564231011066088
Hinton, C., Fischer, K., & Glennon, C. (2012). Mind, brain, and education. Jobs for the Future. March 2012. Accessed 4 August 2017. https://studentsatthecenterhub.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Mind-Brain-Education-Stude nts-at-the-Center-1.pdf: 
Könings, K., Seidel, T., & Van Merrienboer, J. (2014). Participatory design of learning environments: integrating perspectives of students, teachers, and designers. Instructional: 
Edström, K., Kolmos, A. (2014) PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development, European Journal of Engineering Education, 39:5,539-555. : 
10.1080/03043797.2014.895703
Ministry of Education and Culture (2006). University of Applied Sciences’ education in Finland. Accessed 19 December 2017. http://www.minedu.fi/OPM/Koulutus/ammattikorkeakoulutus/?lang=en: 
Ojasalo, K., Koskelo, M. & Nousiainen, A. (2015). Foresight and Service Design Boosting Dynamic Capabilities in Service Innovation. In: Agarwa, R., Selen, W., Roos, G. & Green, R. (Eds.) Handbook of Service Innovation. London: Springer. 193-212.: 
Ojasalo, K. (2015). Using service design methods to improve student-centricity of higher education. In: International Business & Education Conference, New York City, August 2015.: 
Padley, A. (2017). Designing a student-centered learning experience: The Digital Wellbeing Sprint. MBA. Service Innovation and Design. Laurea University of Applied Sciences. http://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/128728: 
Padley, A & Piironen, A.K. (2017), Redesigning for Student Centricity: A Four-Step Process, UAS Journal 3/2017, Rectors’ Conference of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences (Arene), ISSN:1799-6848, Accessed January 4, 2017, URL: https://uasjournal.fi/in-english/redesigning-for-student-centricity/: 
Piironen, A., Haho, P., Hirvikoski, T., Porokuokka, J., & Maki, M. (2017). Experiences on a multidisciplinary CIDO project. Proceedings of the 13th International CDIO Conference, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada, June 18-22, 2017.: 
Ståhlbröst, A. (2012). A set of key principles to assess the impact of living labs. International Journal of Product Development 17(1-2), 60-75. Article from Inderscience Online. Accessed 10 April 2017. http://www.inderscienceonline.com/doi/abs/10.1504/IJPD.2012.051154: 
10.1504/IJPD.2012.051154
Go to top