Teaching Lean Thinking Principles Through Hands-On Simulations

Teaching Lean Thinking Principles Through Hands-On Simulations

H. McManus, E. Rebentisch, A. Stanke (2007).  Teaching Lean Thinking Principles Through Hands-On Simulations. 16.

 

The teaching of Lean Enterprise Thinking in the aerospace context requires that students understand a complex subject—aerospace enterprises and their transformation—in a deep and intuitive way. Without this context, the lessons of the LAI Lean Academy Course® will make little sense. A rich simulation of an enterprise with a structure and problems typical of the US aerospace industry is used as a teaching tool. The simulation allows students to understand Lean Thinking at an intuitive level, and practice lean tools in a realistic setting.

The simulation enables a CDIO approach (in this case, Comprehend, Design, Implement and Operate), by having the students take two iterations through a CDIO process to transform the simulated enterprise from an inefficient legacy state to a high performance future state (x3 to x6 production using the same resources). The simulation and its teaching goals are described, with reference to the limited literature on simulations in education. The process used in the simulation is then described in a CDIO context.

Finally, the success of the simulation is evaluated using limited quantitative and more extensive qualitative data. It is found that the simulation is a powerful learning tool and a key component of the LAI Lean Academy.

 

Authors (New): 
Hugh McManus
Eric Rebentisch
Alexis Stanke
Pages: 
16
Affiliations: 
Eclipse Aviation Albuquerque, USA
Metis Design Cambridge, USA
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Keywords: 
Lean education
simulation
LAI Lean Academy
Active learning
Year: 
2007
Reference: 
Womack, J. and Jones, D., Lean Thinking, Simon & Schuster, 1996.: 
Murman, E., et al., Lean Enterprise Value: Insights from MIT’s Lean Aerospace Initiative, Palgrave, 2002.: 
Candido, J., Murman, E., McManus, H., “Active Learning Strategies for Teaching Lean Thinking,” Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, MA, June 2007.: 
McClean, P., Saini-Eidukat, B., Schwert, D., Slator, B., & White, A., “Virtual Worlds in Large Enrollment Science Classes Significantly Improve Authentic Learning,” in J.A. Chamber (Ed.) Selected Papers from the 12th Intl. Conf. on College Teaching and Learning, Center for the Advancement of Teaching and Learning, Jacksonville, FL, 2001, pp 111-118.: 
Squire, K., “Video games in education,” International Journal of Intelligent Games & Simulation, Vol. 2, 2003, pp 49-62.: 
Squire, K., Barnett, M., Grant, J.M., & Higginbotham, T., “Electromagnetism Supercharged! Learning Physics with Digital Simulation Games,” Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference of the Learning Sciences, UCLA Press, Los Angeles, 2004.: 
Flores, A., “Using Computer Games to Reduce Childhood Obesity,” Agricultural Research, March 2006, pp 9-10: 
Brown, S.J., Lieberman, D.A., Gemeny, B.A., Fan, Y.C., Wilson, D.M., & Pasta, D.J. “Educational video game for juvenile diabetes: Results of a controlled trial,” Medical Informatics, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1997, pp 77- 89: 
Donovan, M. S., Bransford, J. D., & Pellegrino, J.W. (Eds.), How people learn: Bridging research and practice, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1999.: 
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C., “Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions,” In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles. The educational psychology series, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 2001, pp 227-247.: 
Gerhard, M., Moore, D., Hobbs, D., “Embodiment and copresence in collaborative interfaces,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 61, 2004, pp 453-480.: 
Murman, E., McManus, H., Candido, J., “Enhancing Faculty Competency in Lean Thinking Bodies of Knowledge,” Proceedings of the 3rd International CDIO Conference, Cambridge, MA June 2007.: 
See http://supplychain.mit.edu/games/games.aspx: 
Johnson, Sharon A., Gerstenfeld, A., Zeng, A. Z., Ramos, B., and Mishra, S., “Teaching Lean Process Design using a Discovery Approach,” Proc. of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.: 
Verma, Alok K., Bao, H. P., Ghadmode, A., and Dhayagude, S., “Physical Simulations in Classroom as a Pedagogical Tool for Enhancing Manufacturing Instruction in Engineering Technology Programs,” Proc. of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, paper 2005-220.: 
The full LEV simulation has an engineering process module, and several design simulations exist; see for example http://lean.utk.edu/prodev.htm or http://www.wmg.warwick.ac.uk/PagEd-index-topic_id-1-page_id183.phtml: 
Eastlake, Charles, and Attia, M., “Employing Lean Engineering Principles as a Student Exercise to Modify the Content of Traditional Aircraft and Propulsion Design Courses,” Proc. of the 2007 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, paper 2007-268: 
Shewhart, W. A., Economic Control of Quality of Manufactured Product / 50th Anniversary Commemorative Issue, American Society for Quality, 1980.: 
Deming, W.E., “Elementary Principles of the Statistical Control of Quality,” JUSE, 1950 (out of print) or see Deming, W.E., The New Economics for Industry, Government, Education – 2nd Edition, The MIT Press, 2000.: 
Pande, P. and Holpp, L., What is Six Sigma?, McGraw-Hill, 2001.: 
Hammer, M. and Champy, J., Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution (Collins Business Essentials), Collins, 2003.: 
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Flow: The psychology of optimal experience, Harper, New York, 1990.: 
Go to top
randomness